Consequences of hybridization and heterozygosity on plant vigor and phenotypic stability

Plant Science

Volumn 232, Issue , 2015, Pages 35-40

  Fridman, Eyal ^a  

^a VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Canalization; Heterosis; Heterozygosity; Hybridization; Incompatibility; Stability

Indexed keywords

GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRIDIZATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT;

GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HYBRID VIGOR; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS;

EID: 84920274602     PISSN: 01689452     EISSN: 18732259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.014     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Birchler J.A., Yao H., Chudalayandi S. Unraveling the genetic basis of hybrid vigor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12957-12958.
2. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Benjamin Cummings.
3. Lippman Z.B., Zamir D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet. 2007, 23:60-66.
4. Semel Y.J., et al. Overdominant quantitative trait loci for yield and fitness in tomato. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:12981-12986.
5. Zhou G., et al. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:15847-15852.
6. Bateson W. Mendel's Principles of Heredity 1909, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Cordell H.J. Epistasis: what it means, what it doesn't mean, and statistical methods to detect it in humans. Human Mol. Genet. 2002, 11:2463-2468.
8. Ben-Israel I., et al. Multiple biochemical and morphological factors underlie the production of methylketones in tomato trichomes. Plant Phys. 2009, 151:1952-1964.
9. Yu G., et al. Enzymatic functions of wild tomato methylketone synthases 1 and 2. Plant Phys. 2010, 154:67-77.
10. Ng D.W., Lu J., Chen Z.J. Big roles for small RNAs in polyploidy, hybrid vigor, and hybrid incompatibility. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:154-161.
11. Shivaprasad P.V., Dunn R.M., Santos B.A., Bassett A., Baulcombe D.C. Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomato are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO J. 2012, 31:257-266.
12. Flintham J.E., Angus W.J., Gale M.D. Heterosis, overdominance for grain yield, and alpha-amylase activity in F-1 hybrids between near-isogenic Rht dwarf and tall wheats. J. Agri. Sci. 1997, 129:371-378.
13. Krieger U., Lippman Z.B., Zamir D. The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nature Genet. 2010, 42:459-463.
14. Quinby J.R., Karper R.E. Heterosis in sorghum resulting from the heterozygous condition of a single gene that affects duration of growth. Am. J. Bot. 1946, 33:716-721.
15. Kadri N.K., et al. A 660-Kb deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production segregates at high frequency in Nordic Red cattle: additional evidence for the common occurrence of balancing selection in livestock. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10:e1004049.
16. Johnston S.E., et al. Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 2013, 502:93-95.
17. Bomblies K., Weigel D. Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nature Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:382-393.
18. Bomblies K., et al. Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e236.
19. Orr H.A. Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. Genetics 1996, 144:1331-1335.
20. Chen C., et al. A two-locus interaction causes interspecific hybrid weakness in rice. Nature Com. 2014, 5:3357.
21. Mizuta Y., Harushima Y., Kurata N. Rice pollen hybrid incompatibility caused by reciprocal gene loss of duplicated genes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20417-20422.
22. Smith L.M., Bomblies K., Weigel D. Complex evolutionary events at a tandem cluster of Arabidopsis thaliana genes resulting in a single-locus genetic incompatibility. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002164.
23. Ben-Israel I., Kilian B., Nida H., Fridman E. Heterotic trait locus (HTL) mapping identifies intra-locus interactions that underlie reproductive hybrid vigor in Sorghum bicolor. PloS One 2012, 7:e38993.
24. Chae E., Bomblies K., Kim S.T., Karelina D., Zaidem M., Ossowski S., Martín-Pizarro C., Laitinen R.A.E., Rowan B.A., Tenenboim H., Lechner S., Demar M., Habring-Müller A., Lanz C., Rätsch G., Weigal D. Species-wide genetic incompatibility analysis identifies immune genes as hot spots of deleterious epistasis. Cell 2014, 159(6):1341-1351. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.049.
25. Huard-Chauveau C., et al. An atypical kinase under balancing selection confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003766.
26. Jiang K., Liberatore K.L., Park S.J., Alvarez J.P., Lippman Z.B. Tomato yield heterosis is triggered by a dosage sensitivity of the florigen pathway that fine-tunes shoot architecture. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1004043.
27. Yao H., Dogra Gray A., Auger D.L., Birchler J.A. Genomic dosage effects on heterosis in triploid maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:2665-2669.
28. Ispolatov I., Yuryev A., Mazo I., Maslov S. Binding properties and evolution of homodimers in protein-protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:3629-3635.
29. Birchler J.A., Veitia R.A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:14746-14753.
30. Birchler J.A., Veitia R.A. The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution. New Phyto. 2010, 186:54-62.
31. Muhleisen J., Piepho H.P., Maurer H.P., Longin C.F., Reif J.C. Yield stability of hybrids versus lines in wheat, barley, and triticale, Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127:309-316.
32. Lempe J., Lachowiec J., Sullivan A.M., Queitsch C. Molecular mechanisms of robustness in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16:62-69.
33. Flatt T. The evolutionary genetics of canalization. Quart. Rev. Biol. 2005, 80:287-316.
34. Smith G.A., Foote W.H. Effect of heterozygosity on phenotypic stability in spring barley. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 1970, 50:97-101.
35. Lerner I.M. Genetic Homeostasis 1954, Wiley, New York. fourth ed.
36. Hubner S., et al. Strong correlation of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) population structure with temperature and precipitation variation. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:1523-1536.
37. Fischer R.A., Maurer R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars.1 Grain-yield responses. Aust. J. Agri. Res. 1978, 29:897-912.
38. Kumar A., et al. High-yielding, drought-tolerant, stable rice genotypes for the shallow rainfed lowland drought-prone ecosystem. Field Crop Res. 2012, 37-47.
39. Jiang W., et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:e188.