A novel method for comparison of biocidal properties of nanomaterials to bacteria, yeasts and algae

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 286, Issue , 2015, Pages 75-84

  Suppi, Sandra ^a,b   Kasemets, Kaja ^a   Ivask, Angela ^a   Künnis Beres, Kai ^a   Sihtmäe, Mariliis ^a   Kurvet, Imbi ^a   Aruoja, Villem ^a   Kahru, Anne ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICS   (Estonia)

^b TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Bioavailability; Heavy metals; Minimum biocidal concentration; Nanoparticles; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BIOCHEMISTRY; COPPER OXIDES; DEIONIZED WATER; HEAVY METALS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OXIDE MINERALS; SILVER; SILVER COMPOUNDS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TOXICITY; YEAST;

3 ,5-DICHLOROPHENOL; BACTERIAL STRAINS; BIOAVAILABILITY; BIOCIDAL; BIOCIDAL PROPERTIES; TOXICITY MECHANISMS; UNICELLULAR MICROORGANISMS; UNICELLULAR ORGANISMS;

BACTERIA;

3,5 DICHLOROPHENOL; BIOCIDE; COPPER NANOPARTICLE; COPPER SULFATE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; MULTI WALLED NANOTUBE; NANOMATERIAL; SILVER NANOPARTICLE; SILVER NITRATE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; TRICLOSAN; WATER; 3,5-DICHLOROPHENOL; AGAR; BIOMATERIAL; CARBON NANOTUBE; CHLOROPHENOL; COPPER; CULTURE MEDIUM; CUPRIC OXIDE; HEAVY METAL; SILVER; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WATER POLLUTANT;

ALGA; BIOAVAILABILITY; MICROORGANISM; PESTICIDE; TOXICITY; YEAST;

AGAR MEDIUM; ALGA; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG CONCENTRATION; MICROALGA; MINIMUM BIOCIDAL CONCENTRATION; NANOTOXICOLOGY; NONHUMAN; SPOT TEST; SUSPENSION; TOXICITY TESTING; YEAST; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; DRUG EFFECTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TEST; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TEMPERATURE; WATER POLLUTANT;

ALGAE; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

AGAR; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CHLOROPHENOLS; COPPER; COPPER SULFATE; CULTURE MEDIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; METALS, HEAVY; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTUBES, CARBON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SILVER; SILVER NITRATE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TEMPERATURE; TITANIUM; TOXICITY TESTS; TRICLOSAN; WATER POLLUTANTS;

EID: 84920156986     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Nel A., Xia T., Mädler L., Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622-627.
2. Kahru A., Ivask A. Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46:823-833.
3. Ivask S., George O. Metal-containing nano-antimicrobials: differentiating the impact of solubilized metals and particles. Nano-Antimicrobials - Progress and Prospects 2012, 253-290. Springer. N. Cioffi (Ed.).
4. Hossain F., Perales-Perez O.J., Hwang S., Román F. Antimicrobial nanomaterials as water disinfectant: applications, limitations and future perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466-467:1047-1059.
5. Panlilio A.L., Culver D.H., Gaynes R.P., Banerjee S., Henderson T.S., Tolson J.S., Martone W.J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in U.S. hospitals, 1975-1991. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1992, 13:582-586.
6. Goossens H., Ferech M., Vander Stichele R., Elseviers M. Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study. Lancet 2005, 365:579-587.
7. Russell A.D. Introduction of biocides into clinical practice and the impact on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92:121S-135S.
8. Kahru A., Dubourguier H.-C. From ecotoxicology to nanoecotoxicology. Toxicology 2010, 269:105-119.
9. Consumer products inventory Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, a project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, in, 2013. http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/.
10. EC, Regulation No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December, 2006. Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). In: Official Journal of the European Union, L396/1-849, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. 2006.
11. Montoro E., Lemus D., Echemendia M., Martin A., Portaels F., Palomino J.C. Comparative evaluation of the nitrate reduction assay, the MTT test, and the resazurin microtitre assay for drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 55:500-505.
12. Niles A.L., Moravec R.A., Riss T.L. Update on in vitro cytotoxicity assays for drug development. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2008, 3:655-669.
13. Holder A.L., Goth-Goldstein R., Lucas D., Koshland C.P. Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25:1885-1892.
14. Käkinen A., Ding F., Chen P., Mortimer M., Kahru A., Ke P.C. Interaction of firefly luciferase and silver nanoparticles and its impact on enzyme activity. Nanotechnology 2013, 24:345101.
15. Blinova I., Ivask A., Heinlaan M., Mortimer M., Kahru A. Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles of CuO and ZnO in natural water. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:41-47.
16. 4 and CuO nanoparticles: comparative evidence from a Cu-selective electrode and a Cu-biosensor. Sensors 2011, 11:10502-10521.
17. Römer I., Gavin A.J., White T.A., Merrifield R.C., Chipman J.K., Viant M.R., Lead J.R. The critical importance of defined media conditions in Daphnia magna nanotoxicity studies. Toxicol. Lett. 2013, 223:103-108.
18. Besinis A., De Peralta T., Handy R.D. The antibacterial effects of silver, titanium dioxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles compared to the dental disinfectant chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans using a suite of bioassays. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8:1-16.
19. Dhawan A., Sharma V. Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398:589-605.
20. Ong K.J., MacCormack T.J., Clark R.J., Ede J.D., Ortega V.A., Felix L.C., Dang M.K., Ma G., Fenniri H., Veinot J.G., Goss G.G. Widespread nanoparticle-assay interference: implications for nanotoxicity testing. PloS One 2014, 9:e90650.
21. Monteiro-Riviere N.A., Inman A.O., Zhang L.W. Limitations and relative utility of screening assays to assess engineered nanoparticle toxicity in a human cell line. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 234:222-235.
22. 2) nanoparticles and its implications for cytotoxicity assays. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27:1445-1450.
23. Angle J.S., Chaney R.L. Cadmium resistance screening in nitrilotriacetate-buffered minimal media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55:2101-2104.
24. Dartnell L.R., Roberts T.A., Moore G., Ward J.M., Muller J.P. Fluorescence characterization of clinically-important bacteria. PLoS One 2013, 8:e75270.
25. Nowack B., Krug H.F., Height M. 120 years of nanosilver history: implications for policy makers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:1177-1183.
26. Almeida E., Diamantino T.C., de Sousa O. Marine paints: the particular case of antifouling paints. Prog. Org. Coat. 2007, 59:2-20.
27. Bondarenko O., Juganson K., Ivask A., Kasemets K., Mortimer M., Kahru A. Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch. Toxicol. 2013, 87:1181-1200.
28. Elnabarawy M.T., Robideau R.R., Beach S.A. Comparison of three rapid toxicity test procedures: microtox,® polytox,® and activated sludge respiration inhibition. Toxicity Assess. 1988, 3:361-370.
29. McDonnell G., Russell A.D. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12:147-179.
30. Johnston H., Pojana G., Zuin S., Jacobsen N.R., Moller P., Loft S., Semmler-Behnke M., McGuiness C., Balharry D., Marcomini A., Wallin H., Kreyling W., Donaldson K., Tran L., Stone V. Engineered nanomaterial risk. lessons learnt from completed nanotoxicology studies: potential solutions to current and future challenges. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2013, 43:1-20.
31. International Organization for Standards. Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems - Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices. 1. Reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against rapidly growing aerobic bacteria involved in infectious diseases. ISO 20,776-1. International Organization of Standards, Geneva, Switzerland, 15 November, 2006.
32. Kasemets K., Suppi S., Künnis-Beres K., Kahru A. Toxicity of CuO nanoparticles to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and its nine isogenic single-gene deletion mutants. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013, 26:356-367.
33. Ohtani B., Prieto-Mahaney O.O., Li D., Abe R. What is degussa (evonik) P25? Crystalline composition analysis, reconstruction from isolated pure particles and photocatalytic activity test. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2010, 216:179-182.
34. Blinova I., Niskanen J., Kajankari P., Kanarbik L., Käkinen A., Tenhu H., Penttinen O.P., Kahru A. Toxicity of two types of silver nanoparticles to aquatic crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 20:3456-3463.
35. Bondarenko O., Ivask A., Käkinen A., Kurvet I., Kahru A. Particle-cell contact enhances antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. PLoS One 2013, 8:e64060.
36. Kahru A., Dubourguier H.C., Blinova I., Ivask A., Kasemets K. Biotests and biosensors for ecotoxicology of metal oxide nanoparticles: a minireview. Sensors 2008, 8:5153-5170.
37. Laloy J., Minet V., Alpan L., Mullier F., Beken S., Toussaint O., Lucas S., Dogne J.-M. Impact of silver nanoparticles on haemolysis, platelet function and coagulation. Nanobiomedicine 2014, 4. 10.5772/59346.
38. Tejamaya M., Romer I., Merrifield R.C., Lead J.R. Stability of citrate, PVP, and PEG coated silver nanoparticles in ecotoxicology media. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:7011-7017.
39. Sharma V.K., Siskova K.M., Zboril R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Organic-coated silver nanoparticles in biological and environmental conditions: fate, stability and toxicity. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 204:15-34.
40. Breeuwer P., Drocourt J.L., Bunschoten N., Zwietering M.H., Rombouts F.M., Abee T. Characterization of uptake and hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate and carboxyfluorescein diacetate by intracellular esterases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which result in accumulation of fluorescent product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61:1614-1619.
41. Deere D., Shen J., Vesey G., Bell P., Bissinger P., Veal D. Flow cytometry and cell sorting for yeast viability assessment and cell selection. Yeast (Chichester, England) 1998, 14:147-160.
42. Hobbie J.E., Hobbie E.A. Microbes in nature are limited by carbon and energy: the starving-survival lifestyle in soil and consequences for estimating microbial rates. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4:324.
43. Powers K.W., Brown S.C., Krishna V.B., Wasdo S.C., Moudgil B.M., Roberts S.M. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of nanoscale particles for toxicological evaluation. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol. 2006, 90:296-303.
44. Jiang J., Oberdörster G., Biswas P. Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11:77-89.
45. Sorensen S.N., Baun A. Controlling silver nanoparticle exposure in algal toxicity testing - a matter of timing. Nanotoxicology 2014, 1-9.
46. Greenwood R., Kendall K. Selection of suitable dispersants for aqueous suspensions of zirconia and titania powders using acoustophoresis. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 19:479-488.
47. Laurent S., Forge D., Port M., Roch A., Robic C., Vander Elst L., Muller R.N. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108:2064-2110.
48. 2 nanoparticles in aqueous suspension for coatings applications. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012:10.
49. Hitchman A., Sambrook Smith G.H., Ju-Nam Y., Sterling M., Lead J.R. The effect of environmentally relevant conditions on PVP stabilised gold nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2013, 90:410-416.
50. Xu M., Li J., Iwai H., Mei Q., Fujita D., Su H., Chen H., Hanagata N. Formation of nano-bio-complex as nanomaterials dispersed in a biological solution for understanding nanobiological interactions. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2.
51. Verhaar H.J.M., van Leeuwen C.J., Hermens J.L.M. Classifying environmental pollutants. Chemosphere 1992, 25:471-491.
52. Schweizer H.P. Triclosan: a widely used biocide and its link to antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 202:1-7.
53. Russell A.D. Whither triclosan?. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53:693-695.
54. Chuanchuen R., Karkhoff-Schweizer R.R., Schweizer H.P. High-level triclosan resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is solely a result of efflux. Am. J. Infect. Control 2003, 31:124-127.
55. 2 photocatalyst in aqueous media: toward a solar-assisted water disinfection system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28:934-938.
56. Andrews J.M. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 48(Suppl. 1):5-16.
57. Thurman R.B., Gerba C.P. The molecular mechanisms of copper and silver ion disinfection of bacteria and viruses. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1988, 18:295-315.
58. + gradient in Bacillus FTU vesicles. FEBS Lett. 1990, 269:69-72.
59. O'Gorman J., Humphreys H. Application of copper to prevent and control infection. Where are we now?. J. Hosp. Infect. 2012, 81:217-223.
60. 2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1308-1316.
61. 2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407:1461-1468.
62. Ivask A., Juganson K., Bondarenko O., Mortimer M., Aruoja V., Kasemets K., Blinova I., Heinlaan M., Slaveykova V., Kahru A. Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a comparative review. Nanotoxicology 2014, 1:57-71.
63. Li M., Zhu L., Lin D. Toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: mechanism and the influence of medium components. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:1977-1983.
64. Behra R., Sigg L., Clift M.J., Herzog F., Minghetti M., Johnston B., Petri-Fink A., Rothen-Rutishauser B. Bioavailability of silver nanoparticles and ions: from a chemical and biochemical perspective. J. R. Soc. Interface 2013, 10:20130396.
65. Ivask A., Kurvet I., Kasemets K., Blinova I., Aruoja V., Suppi S., Vija H., Kakinen A., Titma T., Heinlaan M., Visnapuu M., Koller D., Kisand V., Kahru A. Size-dependent toxicity of silver nanoparticles to bacteria, yeast, algae, crustaceans and mammalian cells in vitro. PLoS One 2014, 9:e102108.