Shining Spotlights, Zooming Lenses, Grabbing Hands, and Pecking Chickens: The Ebb and Flow of Attention During Events

Understanding Events: From Perception to Action

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Levin, Daniel T ^a   Saylor, Megan M ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge; Metaphor; Model of attention; Perceptual information; Visual attention; Visual awareness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920109155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0022     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Angelone, B., Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2003). The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures. Perception, 32, 947-962.
2. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Austen, E., & Enns, J.T. (2000). Change detection: Paying attention to detail. Psyche, 6(11).
4. Baird, J. A., Baldwin, D. A., & Malle, B. F. (1999). Adults' parsing of continuous action: The role of intention-based units. Unpublished manuscript. Eugene: University of Oregon.
5. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants detect structure in human action: A first step toward understanding others' intentions? Child Development, 72, 708-718.
6. Ballard, D, Hayhoe, M., & Peltz, J. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 66-80.
7. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target selection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
9. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2000). Visual attention. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 272-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10. Driver, J., & Baylis, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 448-456.
11. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 501-517.
12. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
13. Eriksen, C. W., & Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining the efficiency of selective attention. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 330-342.
14. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583-597.
15. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23, 83-116.
16. Fernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (2002). Cause and effect theories of attention:The role of conceptual metaphors. Review of General Psychololgy, 6, 153-165.
17. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Development of knowledge about vision. In Levin, D. T. (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 13-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Gilchrist, I. D., North, A., & Hood, B. (2001). Is visual search really like foraging? Perception, 30, 1459-1464.
19. Goodale, M. A., Meenan, J. P., Buelthoff, H. H., Nicole, D. A., Murphy, K. J., & Racicot, C. I. (1994). Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Current Biology, 4, 604-610.
20. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver studies in cognitive science), Vol. 2 (pp. 89-110). New York:Oxford University Press.
21. Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision using routines. Visual Cognition, 1-3, 43-64.
22. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
23. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14(5), 493-497.
24. Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Toward a topography of mind: An introduction to domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 3-35) New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind's eye. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 247-250.
26. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
27. Keil, F. C., Smith, W. C., Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Two dogmas of conceptual empiricism: Implications for hybrid models of the structure of knowledge. Cognition, 65, 103-135.
28. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
29. Levin, D. T., & Beck, M. R. (2004). Thinking about seeing: Spanning the difference between metacognitive failure and success. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
31. Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L., & Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 93(3), 289-302.
32. Levin, D. T., & Varakin, D. A. (2004). No pause for a brief disruption: Failures of visual awareness during ongoing events. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 363-372.
33. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112(1), 217-242.
35. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
36. Newtson, D. (1973). The dynamics of action and interaction. In L. B. Smith & E. Thelan (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 241-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
38. Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 847-862.
39. Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of a scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 251-256) Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
40. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211.
41. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change blindness as a result of "mudsplashes." Nature, 398, 34.
42. Pashler, H. P. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
43. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
44. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independant targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
45. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
46. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
47. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
48. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
49. Saylor, M. M., & Baldwin, D. A. (2004). Action analysis and change blindness: Possible links. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 37-56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Saylor, M. M., Baldwin, D., Baird, J. A., & Labounty, J. (2007). Infants' on-line segmentation of dynamic human action. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 113-128.
51. Scholl, B. J., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
52. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
53. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a realworld interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
54. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition or return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
55. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
56. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
57. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
58. Winer, G. A., & Cottrell, J. E. (2004). The odd belief that rays exit the eye during vision. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 97-120). Cambridege, MA: MIT Press.
59. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 29-58.
60. Zelinsky, G. J. (2003). Detecting changes between real-world objects using spatiochromatic filters. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 533-555.
61. Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R. P. N., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.