Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 93, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 289-302

  Levin, Daniel T ^a   Simons, Daniel J ^b   Angelone, Bonnie L ^a   Chabris, Christopher F ^b  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL PROCESSES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036675791     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712602760146224     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness and memory: Accuracy is the key. Poster presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
2. Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K., & Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24, 1075-1081.
3. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science) (Vol. 2, pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psychological Science, 8, 51-55.
5. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
6. Levin, D. T., Drivdahl, S. B., Momen, N., & Beck, M. R. (revision in review). False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness.
7. Levin, D. T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412.
8. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
9. McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563-581.
10. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1997). The effects of alignability on memory. Psychological Science, 8, 363-367.
11. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
12. O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191-211.
13. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
14. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
15. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive change in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
16. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind. When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
17. Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1-15.
18. Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 78-97.
19. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267.
20. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
21. Simons, D. J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2001). The role of expectations in change detection and attentional capture. In M. Jenkin & L. Harris, Vision and attention. (pp. 189-208). New York: Springer.