Patient perspectives of telemedicine quality

Patient Preference and Adherence

Volumn 9, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-40

  Lerouge, Cynthia M ^a   Garfield, Monica J ^b   Hevner, Alan R ^c  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BENTLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Feld study; Health care operations; Mixed methodology; Patient perspective; Quality; Technology service encounters; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920080718     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1177889X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S67506     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Darkins A, Carey M. Telemedicine and Telehealth. New York, NY, USA: Springer Publishing Company; 2000.
2. Maheu MM, Whitten P, Allen A. E-Health, Telehealth, and Telemedicine: A Guide to Start-Up and Success. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 2001.
3. Shea S, Kothari D, Teresi JA, et al. Social impact analysis of the effects of a telemedicine intervention to improve diabetes outcomes in an ethnically diverse, medically underserved population: findings from the IDEATel Study. Am J Public Health. 2012;103(10):1888–1894.
4. Grigsby J. Telehealth: an assessment of growth and distribution. J Rural Health. 2002;18(2):348–358.
5. Grigsby J, Sanders J. Telemedicine: where it is and where it is going. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(2):123–127.
6. Levin K, Madsen J, Petersen I, Wanscher C, Hangaard J. Telemedicine diabetes consultations are cost-effective, and effects on essential diabetes treatment parameters are similar to conventional treatment: 7-year results from the Svendborg Telemedicine Diabetes Project. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(3):587–595.
7. Cram N. Telemedicine: a technology primer for clinical engineers. J Clin Eng. 2001;26(1):61–71.
8. Linderoth HCJ. Fiery spirits and supporting programs of action – the keys to exploration and exploitation of open technologies. International Journal of Health Care Technology and Management. 2002;4(3/4):319–332.
9. Shile PE, Kundel HI, Seshradi SB. Factors affecting the electronic communication of radiological information to an intensive-care unit. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(4):199–204.
10. Mitchell BR, Mitchell JG, Disney AP. User adoption issues in renal telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(2):81–86.
11. Franken EA, Whitten P, Smith WL. Teleradiology services for a rural hospital: a case study. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(3):155–160.
12. Armstrong AW, Kwong MW, Chase EP, Ledo L, Nesbitt TS, Shewry SL. Teledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: the referring providers’ perspective. Telemed J E Health. 2012; 18(8):580–584.
13. LeRouge C, Garfield MJ. Crossing the telemedicine chasm: have the U.S. barriers to widespread adoption of telemedicine been significantly reduced? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(12):6472–6484.
14. LeRouge C, Garfeld M, Hevner A. Provider perspectives of telemedicine encounter quality. International Journal of Health Care Technology and Management. 2005;6(4/6):397–419.
15. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ. 2000;320(7248):1517–1520.
16. Brennan JA, Kealy JA, Gerardi LH, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5(1):18–22.
17. Bashshur RL. Telemedicine effects: cost, quality, and access. J Med Syst. 1995;19(2):81–91.
18. Kairy D, Tousignant M, Leclerc N, Cote AM, Levasseur M, Researchers TT. The patient’s perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(9):3998–4011.
19. Prescher S, Deckwart O, Winkler S, Koehler K, Honold M, Koehler F. Telemedical care: feasibility and perception of the patients and physicians: a survey-based acceptance analysis of the Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM-HF) Trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(s2):18–24.
20. von Wangenheim A, de Souza Nobre LF, Tognoli H, Nassar SM, Ho K. User satisfaction with asynchronous telemedicine: a study of users of Santa Catarina’s system of telemedicine and telehealth. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18(5):339–346.
21. Crump WJ, Kumar R, Orsak G, Pfeil T. A feld trial of two telemedicine camera systems in family practice. Arch Fam Med. 1998; 7(2):174–176.
22. Wootton R, Dorman J, Fisk NM, et al. The effect of transmission bandwidth on diagnostic accuracy in remote fetal ultrasound scanning. J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3(4):209–214.
23. Hahm JS, Lee HL, Choi HS, Shimizu S. Telemedicine system using a high-speed network: past, present, and future. Gut Liver. 2009;3(4):247–251.
24. Bensing J, Deveugele M, Moretti F, et al. How to make the medical consultation more successful from a patient’s perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and The Netherlands. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(3):287–293.
25. Harvey J. Service quality: a tutorial. Journal of Operations Management. 1998;16(2):583–597.
26. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2003;19(4):9–30.
27. Stamoulis D, Kanellis P, Martakos D. An approach and model for assessing the business value of e-banking distribution channels: evaluation as communication. Int J Inf Manage. 2002;22(4):247–261.
28. Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemed J. 2000;6(1):5–13.
29. Sousa R, Voss C. Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research. Journal of Operations Management. 2002;20(1):91–109.
30. Morgan DL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications; 1997.
31. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications; 1990.
32. Trauth E, Jessup L. Understanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quarterly. 2000;24(1):43–79.
33. Anderson JC, Rungtusanatham M, Schroeder RG. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Acad Manage Rev. 1994;19(3):472–509.
34. Garvin D. What does “product quality” really mean. Sloan Manage Rev. 1984;26(1):25–45.
35. Juran J. Managing for quality. Journal of Quality and Participation. 1988;11(1):8–12.
36. Barneveld Binkhuysen FH, Ranschaert ER. Teleradiology: evolution and concepts. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(2):205–209.