Social impact analysis of the effects of a telemedicine intervention to improve diabetes outcomes in an ethnically diverse, medically underserved population: Findings from the IDEATel study

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 103, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1888-1894

  Shea, Steven ^a   Kothari, Dhruva ^b   Teresi, Jeanne A ^a,c   Kong, Jian ^c   Eimicke, Joseph P ^c   Lantigua, Rafael A ^a   Palmas, Walter ^a   Weinstock, Ruth S ^d  

^a Division of General Medicine ^*  (United States)

^b New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^c Hebrew Home at Riverdale   (United States)

^d SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL CLASS; TELEMEDICINE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICALLY UNDERSERVED AREA; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SOCIAL CLASS; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84884139104     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300909     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: rationale and design. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9(1): 49-62.
2. Starren J, Hripcsak G, Sengupta S, et al. Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: technical implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9: 25-36.
3. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13: 40-51.
4. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Teresi J, et al, for the IDEATel Consortium. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16: 446-456.
5. Chou AF, Brown AF, Jensen RE, Shih S, Pawlson G, Scholle SH. Gender and racial disparities in the management of diabetes mellitus among Medicare patients. Womens Health Issues. 2007;17: 150-161.
6. Weingarten JP Jr, Brittman S, Hu W, Przybyszewski C, Hammond JM, FitzGerald D. The state of diabetes care provided to Medicare beneficiaries living in rural America. J Rural Health. 2006;22: 351-358.
7. Scott TL, Gazmararian JA,Williams MV, Baker DW. Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2002;40: 395-404.
8. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
9. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36(1): 1-10.
10. US Department of Veteran Affairs. Veterans Health Administration Diabetes Program. Veterans Health Administration Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus in the Primary Care Setting, updated May 2000.
11. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285 (19): 2486-2497.
12. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110: 227-239.
13. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003; 289: 2560-2572.
14. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18: 499-502.
15. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation. 1993;88: 2460-2470.
16. Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK. Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. J Organ Behav. 2010;31(6): 776-786.
17. Emsley R, Dunn G, White IR. Mediation and moderation of treatment effects in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Stat Methods Med Res. 2010;19(3): 237-270.
18. Pincus T, Miles C, Froud R, Underwood M, Carnes D, Taylor SJ. Methodological criteria for assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11: 14.
19. Wang R, Ware JH. Detecting moderator effects using subgroup analyses. Prev Sci. 2013;14(2): 111-120.
20. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19(6): 716-723.
21. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Statist. 1978;6(2): 461-464.
22. Liu X, Teresi JA,Waternaux C. Modeling the decline pattern in functional measures from a prevalent cohort study. Stat Med. 2000;19(11-12): 1593-1606.
23. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE. Variance Components. New York, NY: Wiley; 1992.
24. Kaufman DR, Pevzner J, Hilliman C, Weinstock RS, Shea S, Starren J. Redesigning a telehealth diabetes management program for a digital divide seniors population. Home Health Care Manage Pract. 2006;18 (3): 223-234.
25. Lai AM, Kaufman DR, Starren JB, Shea S, for the IDEATel Consortium. Evaluation of a remote training approach for teaching seniors to use a telehealth system. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78: 732-744.