The patient's perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplasty

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 3998-4011

  Kairy, Dahlia ^a   Tousignant, Michel ^b   Leclerc, Nancy ^b   Côté, Anne Marie ^c   Levasseur, Mélanie ^c  

^a Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GERIATRICS OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Patients; Qualitative; Satisfaction; Semi structured interview; Telerehabilitation

Indexed keywords

DISEASE TREATMENT; MEDICINE; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; IN HOME TELEREHABILITATION SERVICE; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HOUSING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84883728519     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10093998     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Coyte, P.; Young, W. Variation in Use of and Reinvestment in Home Care Services Following an Acute Hospitalization, 1st ed.; The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Science in Ontario: Toronto, Canada, 1997.
2. Pérodeau, G.; Côté, D. Le Virage Ambulatoire: Défis et Enjeux, 1st Ed.; Les presses de l'Université Laval: Ste-Foy, Canada, 2002.
3. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux. Plan de santé et des Services Sociaux, Pour Faire Les Bons Choix. Direction des communications du MSSS-Québec: Québec, Canada, 2002. Available online: http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/2002/02-108.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
4. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux. Plan d'action 2005-2010-un défi de solidarité: Les Services Aux aînés en Perte d'autonomie. Direction des communications du MSSS-Québec: Québec, Canada, 2005. Available online: http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/acrobat/f/documentation/ 2005/05-830-01.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
5. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux. Chez Soi: Le Premier Choix. Précisions Pour Favoriser l'implantation de la Politique de soutien à Domicile. Direction des communications du MSSS-Québec: Québec, Canada, 2004. Available online: http://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/ acrobat/f/documentation/2002/02-704-01.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
6. Latulipe-Richard, C. Regard approfondi sur sept grandes professions de la santé. Le Bloc Notes 2008. Available online: http://www.leblocnotes.ca/node/2457 (accessed on 28 August 2013).
7. Tran, D.; Hall, L.; Davis, A.; Landry, M.; Burnett, D.; Berg, K.; Jaglal, S. Identification of recruitment and retention strategies for rehabilitation professionals in Ontario, Canada: Results from expert panels. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2008, 8, 249, doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-249.
8. Hailey, D.; Roine, R.; Ohinmaa, A.; Dennett, L. Evidence on the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Applications; Institute of Health Economics and Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment, Edmonton and Helsinki, Canada, 2010.
9. Russell, T.G. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J. Telemed. Telecare 2007, 13, 217-220.
10. Kaur, K.; Foducey, P.; Smith, L.; Scheideman-Miller, C. Organisational design and implementation of a telerehabilitation system in Oklahoma. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2004, 6, 56-75.
11. Tousignant, M.; Boissy, P.; Corriveau, H.; Moffet, H. In home telerehabilitation for older adults after discharge from an acute hospital or rehabilitation unit: A proof-of-concept study and costs estimation. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2006, 1, 209-216.
12. Theodoros, D.; Russell, T. Telerehabilitation: Current perspectives. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2008, 131, 191-209.
13. Pineau, G.; Moqadem, K.; St-Hilaire, C.; Levac, E.; Hamel, B. Télésanté: Lignes Directrices Cliniques et Normes Technologiques en Téléréadpatation; Agences des technologies et des modes d'intervention en santé. Gouvernement du Québec: Québec, Canada, 2006. Available online: http://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/AETMIS/Rapports/Telesante/ETMIS2006_Vol2_No3.pdf (accessed on 28 August 2013).
14. Simpson, L.A.; Miller, W.C.; Eng, J.J. Effect of stroke on fall rate, location and predictors: A prospective comparison of older adults with and without stroke. PLoS One 2011, 6, e19431, doi:. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019431.
15. Rogante, M.; Grigioni, M.; Cordella, D.; Giacomozzi, C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2010, 27, 287-304.
16. Johansson, T.; Wild, C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care-A systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare 2011, 17, 1-6.
17. Kairy, D.; Lehoux, P.; Vincent, C.; Visintin, M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil. Rehabil. 2009, 31, 427-447.
18. Broens, T.H.; Huis in't Veld, R.M.; Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.M.; Hermens, H.J.; van Halteren, A.T.; Nieuwenhuis, L.J. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: A literature study. J. Telemed. Telecare 2007, 13, 303-309.
19. Finch, T.; Mort, M.; May, C.; Mair, F. Telecare: Perspectives on the changing role of patients and citizens. J. Telemed. Telecare 2005, 11, 51-53.
20. Jackson, D.E.; McClean, S.I. Trends in telemedicine assessment indicate neglect of key criteria for predicting success. JHOM 2012, 26, 508-523.
21. Mair, F.; Whitten, P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000, 320, 1517-1520.
22. Mair, F.S.; Goldstein, P.; May, C.; Angus, R.; Shiels, C.; Hibbert, D.; O'Connor, J.; Boland, A.; Roberts, C.; Haycox, A.; et al. Patient and provider perspectives on home telecare: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial. J. Telemed. Telecare 2005, 11, 95-97.
23. Tousignant, M.; Boissy, P.; Moffet, H.; Corriveau, H.; Cabana, F.; Marquis, F.; Simard, J. Patients' satisfaction of healthcare services and perception with in-home telerehabilitation and physiotherapists' satisfaction toward technology for post-knee arthroplasty: An embedded study in a randomized trial. Telemed. J. E Health 2011, 17, 376-382.
24. Cranen, K.; Drossaert, C.H.; Brinkman, E.S.; Braakman-Jansen, A.L.; Ijzerman, M.J.; Vollenbroek-Hutten, M.M. An exploration of chronic pain patients' perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect. 2011, 15, 339-350.
25. Cranen, K.; Veld, R.H.; Ijzerman, M.; Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. Change of patients' perceptions of telemedicine after brief use. Telemed. J. E Health 2011, 17, 530-535.
26. Huis in't Veld, R.; Kosterink, S.; Barbe, T.; Lindegard, A.; Marecek, T.; Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. Relation between patient satisfaction, compliance and the clinical benefit of a teletreatment application for chronic pain. J. Telemed. Telecare 2010, 16, 322-328.
27. Eriksson, L.; Lindstrom, B.; Ekenberg, L. Patients' experiences of telerehabilitation at home after shoulder joint replacement. J. Telemed. Telecare 2011, 17, 25-30.
28. Piron, L; Turolla A; Tonin P; Piccione F; Lain L; Dam M. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J. Telemed. Telecare 2008, 14, 257-260.
29. Yin, R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003.
30. Tripp-Reimer, T.; Doebbeling, B. Qualitative perspectives in translational research. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. 2004, 1, S65-S72.
31. Groenewald, T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2004, 3, 4: 1-26.
32. Moffet, H.; Collet, J.P.; Shapiro, S.H.; Paradis, G.; Marquis, F.; Roy, L. Effectiveness of intensive rehabilitation on functional ability and quality of life after first total knee arthroplasty: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 85, 546-556.
33. Tousignant, M.; Boissy, B.; Corriveau, H.; Moffet, H.; Cabana, F. In-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty: A pilot study. Int. J. Telereabil. 2009, 1, 9-16.
34. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.; Davis, G.; Davis, F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quaterly 2003, 27, 425-478.
35. Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed.; Sage publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994.
36. Crepeau, E.B.; Garren, K.R. I looked to her as a guide: The therapeutic relationship in hand therapy. Disabil. Rehabil. 2011, 33, 872-881.
37. Bonnin, M.P.; Basiglini, L.; Archbold, H.A. What are the factors of residual pain after uncomplicated tka? Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2011, 19, 1411-1417.
38. Brander, V.A.; Stulberg, S.D.; Adams, A.D.; Harden, R.N.; Bruehl, S.; Stanos, S.P.; Houle, T. Predicting total knee replacement pain: A prospective, observational study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 416, 27-36.
39. Guba, E.; Lincoln, Y. Fourth Generation Evaluation; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1989.