The effects of online peer assessment and family entrepreneurial experience on students’ business planning performance

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 123-132

  Lee, Chun Yi ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Business plan; Entrepreneurship; Higher education; Online peer assessment; Peer observation and feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920065298     PISSN: 13036521     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: New York: Freeman.
2. Davis, E.A. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in kie. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837. doi: 10.1080/095006900412293
3. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. doi: 10.3102/00346543070003287
4. Finkle, T.A., Kuratko, D.F., & Goldsby, M.G. (2006). An examination of entrepreneurship centers in the united states: A national survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 184-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00163.x
5. Graesser, A.C., & Person, N.K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137. doi: 10.3102/00028312031001104
6. Hills, G.E. (1988). Variations in university entrepreneurship education: An empirical study of an evolving field. Journal of Business Venturing, 3(2), 109-122. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(88)90021-3
7. Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258-273. doi: 848029821; 15518681; 59066
8. Katstra, J., Tollefson, N., & Gilbert, E. (1987). The effects of peer evaluation on attitude toward writing and writing fluency of ninth grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 80(3), 168. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1290433945?accountid=8008
9. Kirkwood, J. (2007). Igniting the entrepreneurial spirit: Is the role parents play gendered? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 13(1), 39-59. doi: 10.1108/13552550710725174
10. Klinger, B., & Schündeln, M. (2011). Can entrepreneurial activity be taught? Quasi-experimental evidence from central america. World Development, 39(9), 1592-1610. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.021
11. Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 123-144. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62009767?accountid=8008
12. Li, L., & Steckelberg, A.L. (2005). Impact of technology-mediated peer assessment on student project quality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Association for Educational Communications and Technoloy International Conference.
13. Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A.L. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/742870483?accountid=8008
14. Liu, E.Z.-F., & Lee, C.-Y. (2013). Using peer feedback to improve learning via online peer assessment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 187-199. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i1/12119.pdf
15. Mason, C., & Stark, M. (2004). What do investors look for in a business plan?: A comparison of the investment criteria of bankers, venture capitalists and business angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227-248. doi: 10.1177/0266242604042377
16. Ooi Yeng, K., Selvarajah, C., & Meyer, D. (2011). Inclination towards entrepreneurship among university students: An empirical study of malaysian university students. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(4), n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/904524304?accountid=8008
17. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. (2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self-assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 273-290. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/210670335?accountid=8008
18. Pope, N. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 235-246. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/203798150?accountid=8008
19. Schunk, D. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning in B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, pp.125-151. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Sung, Y.-T., Lin, C.-S., Lee, C.-L., & Chang, K.-E. (2003). Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self-assessment and peer assessment. Teaching of Psychology, 30(4), 331-334. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/62002920?accountid=8008
21. Vesper, K. H. (1996). New Venture Experience, rev. edn. Seattle, WA: Vector Books.
22. Wang, C.K., & Wong, P.-K. (2004). Entrepreneurial interest of university students in singapore. Technovation, 24(2), 163-172. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4972(02)00016-0
23. Wen, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 55-67. doi: citeulike-article-id:2229988 doi: 10.1080/13562510701794050
24. Yonca, G.r., & Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in turkey. Education & Training, 48(1), 25-38. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/237070423?accountid=8008
25. Zampetakis, L.A., & Moustakis, V. (2006). Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(3), 413-428. doi: 10.1007/s11365-006-0006-z
26. Zhao, Y. (1998). The effects of anonymity on computer-mediated peer review. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 311–345.