Planning sustainable electric-power system with carbon emission abatement through CDM under uncertainty

Applied Energy

Volumn 140, Issue , 2015, Pages 350-364

  Zhou, Y ^a   Li, Y P ^a   Huang, G H ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Carbon emission abatement; Clean development mechanism; Electric power system; Fuzzy programming; Planning; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS EMISSIONS; PLANNING; POPULATION STATISTICS; SOLAR ENERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WIND POWER;

CARBON EMISSIONS; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS (EPS); FUZZY PROGRAMMING; POSSIBILISTIC PROGRAMMING; SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES; UNCERTAINTY;

ENERGY POLICY;

CARBON EMISSION; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ELECTRICAL POWER; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY PLANNING; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; POWER GENERATION; SUSTAINABILITY;

CHINA; GUANGDONG;

EID: 84919936225     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.057     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. 2 emissions in five Latin American countries: changes from 1990 to 2006 and perspectives. Energy 2011, 36(6):3629-3638.
2. Chen Z.M., Chen G.Q., Chen B. Embodied carbon dioxide emission by the globalized economy: a systems ecological input-output simulation. J Environ Inform 2013, 21(1):35-44.
3. IEA. CO2 emissions form fuel combustion-highlight. Paris: OECD/IEA; 2012.
4. IPCC. Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press; 2007.
5. USGCRP. Global climate change impacts in the United States. United States global change research program. New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press; 2009.
6. Eissa A.E., Zaki M.M. The impact of global climatic changes on the aquatic environment. Proc Environ Sci 2011, 4:251-259.
7. Ghommem M., Hajj M.R., Puri I.K. Influence of natural and anthropogenic carbon dioxide sequestration on global warming. Ecol Model 2012, 235-236:1-7.
8. Bazmi A.A., Zahedi G. Sustainable energy systems: role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply - a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15(8):3480-3500.
9. Sampaio H.C., Dias R.A., Balestieri J.A.P. Sustainable urban energy planning: the case study of a tropical city. Appl Energy 2013, 104:924-935.
10. SchlÃr H. Sustainable development, justice and the Atkinson index: measuring the distributional effects of the German energy transition. Appl Energy 2013, 112:1493-1499.
11. Hoggett R. Technology scale and supply chains in a secure, affordable and low carbon energy transition. Appl Energy 2014, 123:296-306.
12. Wang Q., Chen Y. Barriers and opportunities of using the clean development mechanism to advance renewable energy development in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010, 14:1989-1998.
13. Zhang J.J., Wang C. Co-benefits and additionality of the clean development mechanism: an empirical analysis. J Environ Econ Manage 2011, 62:140-154.
14. Jacques D.A., Guan D.B., Geng Y., Xue B., Wang X.G. Inter-provincial clean development mechanism in China: a case study of the solar PV sector. Energy Policy 2013, 57:454-461.
15. Pettersson F. Carbon pricing and the diffusion of renewable power generation in Eastern Europe: a linear programming approach. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2412-2425.
16. Gilau A.M., Buskirk R.V., Smal M.J. Enabling optimal energy options under the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5526-5534.
17. Park T., Kim C., Kim H. A real option-based model to valuate CDM projects under uncertain energy policies for emission trading. Appl Energy 2014, 131:288-296.
18. Resnier M., Wang C., Du P.F., Chen J.N. The promotion of sustainable development in China through the optimization of a tax/subsidy plan among HFC and power generation CDM projects. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4529-4544.
19. Purohit P. Small hydro power projects under clean development mechanism in India: a preliminary assessment. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2000-2015.
20. 2 emissions mitigation potential of solar home systems under clean development mechanism in India. Energy 2009, 34:1014-1023.
21. Couth R., Trois C., Parkin J., Strachan L.J., Gilder A., Wrigh M. Delivery and viability of landfill gas CDM projects in Africa - a South African experience. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:392-403.
22. Amatayakul W., Berndes G. Determining factor for the development of CDM biomass power projects. Energy Sustain Dev 2012, 16:197-203.
23. Li Y.P., Huang G.H. Electric-power systems planning and greenhouse-gas emission management under uncertainty. Energy Convers Manage 2012, 57:173-182.
24. Sunderkötter M., Weber C. Valuing fuel diversification in power generation capacity planning. Energy Econ 2012, 34(5):1664-1674.
25. Suo M.Q., Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Deng D.L., Li Y.F. Electric power system planning under uncertainty using inexact inventory nonlinear programming method. J Environ Inform 2013, 22(1):49-67.
26. Lotfi M.M., Ghaderi S.F. Possibilistic programming approach for mid-term electric power planning in deregulated markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2012, 34(1):161-170.
27. Yang M., Nguyen F., T'Serclaes P.D., Buchner B. Wind farm investment risks under uncertain CDM benefit in China. Energy Policy 2010, 38(3):1436-1447.
28. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Li M.W. An integrated optimization modeling approach for planning emission trading and clean-energy development under uncertainty. Renew Energy 2014, 62:31-46.
29. Muela E., Schweickardt G., Garcés F. Fuzzy possibilistic model for medium-term power generation planning with environmental criteria. Energy Policy 2007, 35(11):5643-5655.
30. Tan R.R., Ng D.K.S., Foo D.C.Y., Aviso K.B. Crisp and fuzzy integer programming models for optimal carbon sequestration retrofit in the power sector. Chem Eng Res Des 2010, 88:1580-1588.
31. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Chen X. An interval-valued minimax-regret analysis approach for the identification of optimal greenhouse-gas abatement strategies under uncertainty. Energy Policy 2011, 39(7):4313-4324.
32. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Chen X. Planning regional energy system in association with greenhouse gas mitigation under uncertainty. Appl Energy 2011, 88(3):599-611.
33. Oliveira C., Antunes C.H. A multi-objective multi-sectoral economy-energy-environment model: application to Portugal. Energy 2011, 36:2856-2866.
34. Weber K., Martinsen D. From system cost minimization to sustainability maximization-a new fuzzy program approach to energy systems analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2013, 231:1-25.
35. 2 capture and sequestration under uncertainty through inexact modeling. Appl Energy 2014, 113:310-317.
36. Tapia JFD, Tan RR. Fuzzy optimization of multi-period carbon capture and storage systems with parametric uncertainties. Process Saf Environ Prot 2014 [in press]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.012. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.012.
37. Chen W.T., Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Chen X., Li Y.F. A two-stage inexact-stochastic programming model for planning carbon dioxide emission trading under uncertainty. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1033-1047.
38. Zhu Y., Li Y.P., Huang G.H. Planning carbon emission trading for Beijing's electric power systems under dual uncertainties. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013, 23:113-128.
39. Huang G.H., Baetz B.W., Patry G.G. Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 1995, 83(3):594-620.
40. Torabi S.A., Hassini E. An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2008, 159:193-214.
41. Mula J., Peidro D., Poler R. The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand. Int J Prod Econ 2010, 128:136-143.
42. Zhou Y., Li Y.P., Huang G.H. Integrated modeling approach for sustainable municipal energy system planning and management - a case study of Shenzhen, China. J Cleaner Prod 2014, 75:143-156.
43. Tanaka H., Guo P.J., Zimmermann H.J. Possibility distributions of fuzzy decision variables obtained from possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2000, 113:323-332.
44. Jiménez M., Arenas M., Bilbao A., Rodriguez M.V. Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: an interactive method resolution. Eur J Oper Res 2007, 177:1599-1609.
45. Heilpern S. The expected value of a fuzzy number. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1992, 47:81-86.
46. Liu B.D., Iwamura K. Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1998, 94:227-237.
47. Inuiguchi M., Ramik J. Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst 2000, 111:3-28.
48. Fan Y.R., Huang G.H. A robust two-step method for solving interval linear programming problems within an environmental management context. J Environ Inform 2012, 19(1):1-9.
49. Statistics Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality. Shenzhen statistical yearbook in 2011. Shenzhen, China: China Statistical Press; 2011 [in Chinese].
50. General Office of Shenzhen Municipal People's Government. 12th Five-year-plan on Shenzhen energy conservation. Shenzhen, China; 2011 [in Chinese].
51. Sate Council Information Office. White paper on China's policies and actions for addressing climate change. Beijing, China; 2011 [in Chinese].
52. Science, Industry, Trade and Information Technology Commission of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen Institute of Building Research. 12th Five-year-plan on Shenzhen industrial and commercial energy conservation. Shenzhen; China; 2011 [in Chinese].
53. Shenzhen Municipal People's Government. 12th Five-year-plan on Shenzhen national economy and social development. Shenzhen, China; 2011 [in Chinese].
54. Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen Municipality. Mid- and long-term plans on Shenzhen low carbon development (2011-2020). Shenzhen, China; 2010 [in Chinese].