Carbon pricing and the diffusion of renewable power generation in Eastern Europe: A linear programming approach

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2412-2425

  Pettersson, Fredrik ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Power generation; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DIFFUSION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

CARBON PRICING; CLIMATE POLICY; RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; LINEAR PROGRAMING; MODEL; POWER GENERATION; RISK FACTOR;

CROATIA; EASTERN EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; MACEDONIA [SOUTHERN EUROPE]; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SERBIA; SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO; SOUTHERN EUROPE; UKRAINE;

EID: 33845395049     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arrow K.J. The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Stuides 29 3 (1962) 155-173
2. Bartle A. Hydropower potential and development activities. Energy Policy 30 14 (2002) 1231-1239
3. Boyd G.A., Molburg J.C., and Cavallo J.D. Estimates of learning by doing in the manufacture of electric power gas turbines. Energy Studies Review 10 2 (2002) 85-99
4. Claeson Colpier U.D., and Cornland D. The economics of the combined cycle gas turbine-an experience curve analysis. Energy Policy 30 4 (2002) 309-316
5. Duic N., Jureti F., Zelji M., and Bogdan Z. Croatia energy planning and Kyoto protocol. Energy Policy 33 8 (2005) 1003-1010
6. Electric Power Industry (EPS), 2003. Electric power industry of Serbia, annual report 2002. Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro.
7. Ellerman A.D. Tradable Permits for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Report No. 69. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change (2000), MIT Cambridge, USA
8. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), 2004. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development country profiles. London.
9. European Commission (EC). European energy and transport: trends to 2030 (2003), Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Luxembourg
10. European Commission (EC), 2003b. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the directive establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto protocol's project mechanisms. COM (2003) 403 Final. Brussels.
11. Fankhauser S., and Lavric L. The investment climate for climate investments: joint implementation in the transition countries. Climate Policy 3 4 (2003) 417-434
12. Feretic D., Tomsic Z., and Cavlina N. Feasibility analysis of wind-energy utilization in Croatia. Energy Policy 24 3 (1999) 236-246
13. Hall D.O., Rosillo-Calle F., and Woods J. Biomass utilization in households & industry: energy use and development. Chemosphere 29 5 (1994) 1099-1199
14. Horn M. Energy demand until 2010 in Ukraine. Energy Policy 27 12 (1999) 713-726
15. In: Houghton T., Ding Y., Griggs D.J., Noguer M., van der Linden P.J., Dai X., Maskell K., and Johnson C.A. (Eds). Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York
16. Illum K., and Meyer N.I. Joint implementation: methodology and policy consideration. Energy Policy 32 8 (2004) 1013-1023
17. International Energy Agency (IEA). Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy (2000), IEA/OECD, Paris
18. International Energy Agency (IEA). Renewables in Russia-from Opportunity to Reality (2003), IEA/OECD, Paris
19. International Energy Agency (IEA). Electricity information (2005), IEA/OECD, Paris
20. Jaffe A.B., Newell R.G., and Stavins R.N. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 54 2-3 (2005) 164-174
21. Jelic K., Cubric S., Pavicici H., and Bosnjak R. Geothermal Energy Potential and Utilization in The Republic of Croatia. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress (2000), Kyushu-Tohoku, Tokyo Japan; May 28; 2000
22. Junginger M., Faaij A., and Turkenberg W.C. Global experience curves for wind farms. Energy Policy 33 2 (2005) 133-150
23. Karasalihovic D., Maurovic′ L., and Sunjerga S. Natural gas in Croatia's energy-future. Applied Energy 75 1-2 (2003) 9-22
24. Klaassen G., Amann M., Berglund C., Cofala J., Höglund-Isaksson L., Heyes C., Mechler R., Tohka A., Schöpp W., and Winiwarter W. The extension of the RAINS model to include greenhouse gases (2004), IIASA Interim Report IR-04-015. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
25. Klimont Z., Cofala J., Bertok I., Amann M., Heyes C., and Gyarfas F. Modelling particulate emissions in Europe: a framework to estimate reduction potential and control costs. IIASA Interim Report IR-02-076 (2002), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria
26. Kouvaritakis N., Soria A., and Isoard S. Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 1-4 (2000) 104-115
27. Kulik M. Personal Communication. Kiev (2004), Energy institute, Ukraine
28. Köhler J., Grubb M., Popp D., and Edenhofer O. The transition to endogenous technical change in climate models: a technical overview to the innovation modeling comparison project. The Energy Journal Special issue (2006) 17-56
29. Martinot E. Renewable energy in Russia: markets, development and technology transfer. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 3 1 (1999) 49-75
30. McDonald A., and Schrattenholzer L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29 4 (2001) 255-261
31. Nemet G. Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics. Energy Policy 34 17 (2006) 3218-3232
32. del Rio P., Hernandez F., and Gual M. The implication of the Kyoto project mechanisms for the deployment of renewable electricity in Europe. Energy Policy 33 15 (2005) 2010-2022
33. Regional Air Pollution and Simulation Model (RAINS), 2005. The RAINS Model. Internet: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/tap/RainsWeb/, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.
34. 2 energy pathways and regional air pollution in Europe. Energy Policy 29 11 (2001) 871-884
35. Söderholm, P., Klaassen, G., 2006. Wind power in Europe: a simultaneous innovation-diffusion model. Forthcoming, Environmental and Resource Economics.
36. 2 reductions in the European power sector. Energy Studies Review 11 2 (2003) 171-204
37. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2004. National communications under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Internet: http://unfccc.int/national_reports/items/1408.php, New York, Geneva.
38. Varadarajan, A., Kennedy, D., 2003. Review of electricity supply and demand in SouthEastern Europe. World Bank Working Papers No. 17. Washington D.C.
39. Victor D.G., Nakicenovic N., and Victor N. The Kyoto Protocol emission allocations: windfall surprises for Russia and Ukraine. Climatic Change 49 3 (2001) 263-277
40. World Energy Council (WEC). Restructuring and privatizing the coal industries in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS (2000), World Energy Council, London