Fuzzy optimization of multi-period carbon capture and storage systems with parametric uncertainties

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 545-554

  Tapia, John Frederick D ^a   Tan, Raymond R ^a  

^a DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Data uncertainty; Fuzzy mixed integer linear programming; Optimization; Source sink matching; Technical risk

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DIGITAL STORAGE; EMISSION CONTROL; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); DATA UNCERTAINTY; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAM; MIXED INTEGER LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PARAMETRIC UNCERTAINTIES; SOURCE-SINK; TECHNICAL RISKS;

CARBON CAPTURE;

EID: 84923016443     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2014.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayan, P., de Diego, L.F., Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 38 (2012), 215–282.
2. 2: application, feasibility and efficiency of global sensitivity analysis and risk assessment using the arbitrary polynomial chaos. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 19 (2013), 606–608.
3. Asian Development Bank, Prospect of CCS in Southeast Asia. 2013, ADB, Manila.
4. 2 storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 34 (2008), 254–273.
5. 2 in solution. Energy Convers. Manage. 44 (2003), 3151–3175.
6. 2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1 (2007), 430–443.
7. Ball, M., Wietschel, M., The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities and Challenges. 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. 2 plume extension during geological storage. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), November 2008, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
9. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A., Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage. Sci. 17 (1970), B141–B164.
10. 2 sequestration. 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, October 2002, Kyoto, Japan, 2003.
11. Bhattacharyya, S.C., Fossil-fuel dependence and vulnerability of electricity generation: case of selected European countries. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 2411–2420.
12. 2 geological storage potential and matching of emission sources to potential sinks. Energy 29 (2004), 1623–1631.
13. 2 storage capacity estimation: issues and development of standards. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1 (2007), 62–68.
14. Butt, T.E., Giddings, R.D., Jones, K.G., Environmental sustainability and climate change mitigation – CCS technology, better having it than not having it at all. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 31 (2012), 642–649.
15. Carlsson, C., Korhonen, P.A., A parametric approach to fuzzy linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20 (1986), 17–39.
16. 2 Storage Capacity Estimation and the USDOE Capacity and Fairways Subgroup of the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Program, 2008.
17. Čuček, L., Klemeš, J.J., Kravanja, Z., A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 34 (2012), 9–20.
18. Czogala, E., Zimmermann, H.J., The aggregation operations for decision making in probabilistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 13 (1984), 223–239.
19. Davison, J., Freund, P., Smith, A., Putting Carbon Back into the Ground. 2001, International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham.
20. 2 storage: multi-scale heterogeneity and its impacts on storage capacity, injectivity and leakage. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 10 (2012), 397–418.
21. Diamante, J.A.R., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., A graphical approach for pinch-based source-sink matching and sensitivity analysis in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 (2013), 7211–7222.
22. Diamante, J.A.R., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Aviso, K.B., Bandopadhyay, S., Unified pinch approach for targeting of carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems with multiple time periods and regions. J. Clean. Prod., 2014, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.027.
23. Elkamel, A., Hashim, H., Douglas, P.L., Croiset, E., Optimization of energy usage for fleet-wide power generating system under carbon mitigation options. AIChE J. 55 (2009), 3168–3190.
24. Fimbres Weihs, G.A., Wiley, D.E., Ho, M., Steady-state optimisation of CCS pipeline networks for cases with multiple emission sources and injection sites: south-east Queensland case study. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
25. Geoffrion, A.M., The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers. Interfaces 7 (1976), 81–92.
26. Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., Carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 36 (2008), 4317–4322.
27. He, Y.-J., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z.-F., Sahinidis, N.V., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems under uncertainty. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53 (2014), 778–785.
28. 2 storage capacity in geological formations of Germany and Northern Europe. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
29. Holloway, P., Carbon dioxide capture and geologic storage. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 365 (2007), 1095–1107.
30. International Energy Agency, Technology roadmap. Carbon Capture and Storage, 2010, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
31. International Energy Agency, Key World Energy Statistics 2012. 2012, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
32. 2 capture. Appl. Therm. Eng. 30 (2010), 53–62.
33. Lee, J.Y., Chen, C.L., Comments on continuous-time optimization model for source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012), 11590–11591.
34. Lee, J.-Y., Tan, R.R., Chen, C.-L., A unified model for the deployment of carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy 121 (2014), 140–148.
35. Lindo Systems, Inc., Lingo: The Modelling Language and Optimizer. 2010, Lindo Systems, Inc., Chicago, USA.
36. 2 transport and storage infrastructure. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 8 (2012), 132–142.
37. 2 capture coupled with enhanced oil recovery. Int. J. Energy Res. 37 (2013), 1794–1810.
38. 2 capture and storage infrastructure. Environ. Model. Softw. 37 (2012), 193–205.
39. Middleton, R., Bielicki, J., A comprehensive carbon capture and storage infrastructure model. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), November 2008, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
40. 2 capture and storage: variable electricity generation and fossil fuel power. Appl. Energy 108 (2013), 66–73.
41. Nakata, T., Silva, D., Rodionov, M., Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 37 (2011), 462–502.
42. Odeh, N.A., Cockerill, T.T., Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Convers. Manage. 49 (2008), 212–220.
43. Ooi, R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Tan, R.R., Graphical targeting tool for the planning of carbon capture and storage. Chem. Eng. Trans. 29 (2012), 415–420.
44. Ooi, R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Tan, R.R., Planning of carbon capture and storage with pinch analysis techniques. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 19 (2013), 2721–2731.
45. 2 emissions mitigation in the Canadian oil sands industry. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9), November 2008, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
46. 2 storage capacity estimates for selected regions of China – results from the China-UK Near Zero Emissions Coal (NZEC) Initiative. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011.
47. Pekala, L.M., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Jezowski, J., Optimal energy planning models with carbon footprint constraints. Appl. Energy 87 (2010), 1903–1910.
48. Philippine Department of Energy (DOE), Determining the potential for carbon capture and storage in Southeast Asia. Philippine Country Summary Report, 2013, Coordinating Committee for Geosciences Program in East and Southeast Asia http://www.ccop.or.th/ccsm/data/9/docs/Phil_CCSM_T2.pdf.
49. Philippine Department of Energy, 2012 List of Existing Power Plants. 2012 Retrieved from http://www.doe.gov.ph/doe_files/pdf/01_Energy_Situationer/2012-Power-Plants-Luzon.pdf (accessed 23.07.13).
50. Pires, J.C.M., Martins, F.G., Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.M., Simões, M., Recent developments on carbon capture and storage: an overview. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89 (2011), 1446–1460.
51. 2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 9 (2012), 10–23.
52. Shell Philippines Exploration, Overview of Malampaya: A Story of Power. 2009 Retrieved from http://malampaya.com/?page_id=2 (accessed 24.07.13).
53. 2 geological storage capacity analysis in Estonia and neighbouring regions. 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, September 2010, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., 2011.
54. Sun, L., Chen, W., The improved ChinaCCS decision support system: a case study for Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China. Appl. Energy 112 (2013), 793–799.
55. Suzuki, H., Sasaki, K., Sugai, Y., Total evaluation on CCS system against geological uncertainty and troubles. 11th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, November 2012, Kyoto, Japan, 2013.
56. Tan, R.R., Fuzzy optimization model for source-sink water network synthesis with parametric uncertainties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (2011), 3686–3694.
57. Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S., Continuous-time optimization model for source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 (2012), 10015–10020.
58. Tan, R.R., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ng, D.K.S., Optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with time, injection rate and capacity constraints. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 32 (2013), 411–416.
59. Tan, R.R., Cruz, D.E., Synthesis of robust water reuse networks for single-component retrofit problems using symmetric fuzzy linear programming. Comput. Chem. Eng. 28 (2004), 2547–2551.
60. Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K.S., Foo, D.C.Y., Pinch analysis approach to carbon-constrained planning for sustainable power generation. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 940–944.
61. Tan, R.R., Ng, D.K.S., Foo, D.C.Y., Aviso, K.B., Crisp and fuzzy integer programming models for optimal carbon sequestration retrofit in the power sector. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 88 (2010), 1580–1588.
62. Tan, R.R., Ooi, R., Foo, D.C.Y., Ng, D.K.S., Aviso, K.B., Bandyopadhyay, S., A graphical approach to optimal source-sink matching in carbon capture and storage systems with reservoir capacity and injection rate constraints. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 31 (2012), 480–484.
63. 2 transport: a new application of the assignment problem. Energy 12 (1987), 123–130.
64. Wall, T., Liu, Y., Spero, C., Elliot, L., Khare, S., et al. An overview on oxyfuel coal combustion – state of the art research and technology development. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87 (2009), 1003–1016.
65. 2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89 (2011), 1609–1624.
66. Wiedmann, T., Minx, J., A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Pertsova, C.C., (eds.) Ecological Economics Research Trends, 2008, Nova Science Publisher Hauppauge, NY, USA, 1–11 (Chapter 1).
67. Zadeh, L.A., Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8 (1965), 338–353.
68. Zimmermann, H.J., Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1 (1978), 45–55.