Evaluating the inverse decision-making approach to preference learning

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24: 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2011, NIPS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Jern, Alan ^a   Lucas, Christopher G ^a   Kemp, Charles ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

DATA SET; DATA SUPPORT; DECISIONS MAKINGS; FEATURE BASED APPROACHES; GENERATIVE MODEL; LEARNING TASKS; PREFERENCE LEARNING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85162426834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. D. McFadden. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka, editor, Frontiers in Econometrics. Amademic Press, New York, 1973.
2. C. G. Lucas, T. L. Griffiths, F. Xu, and C. Fawcett. A rational model of preference learning and choice prediction by children. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems 21, 2009.
3. L. Bergen, O. R. Evans, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Learning structured preferences. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2010.
4. A. Jern and C. Kemp. Decision factors that support preference learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2011.
5. T. Kushnir, F. Xu, and H. M. Wellman. Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of other people. Psychological Science, 21(8):1134-1140, 2010.
6. L. Ma and F. Xu. Young children's use of statistical sampling evidence to infer the subjectivity of preferences. Cognition, in press.
7. M. J. Doherty. Theory of Mind: How Children Understand Others' Thoughts and Feelings. Psychology Press, New York, 2009.
8. R. N. Shepard, C. I. Hovland, and H. M. Jenkins. Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs, 75, Whole No. 517, 1961.
9. D. N. Osherson, E. E. Smith, O.Wilkie, A. López, and E. Shafir. Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97(2):185-200, 1990.
10. E. A.Wasserman, S. M. Elek, D. L. Chatlosh, and A. G. Baker. Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(1):174-188, 1993.
11. R. D. Luce. Individual choice behavior. John Wiley, 1959.
12. D. Ariely, G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60:1-10, 2006.
13. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3):430-454, 1972.
14. D. Newtson. Dispositional inference from effects of actions: Effects chosen and effects forgone. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10:489-496, 1974.
15. P. C. Fishburn. Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: A survey. Management Science, 20(11):1442-1471, 1974.
16. G. Gigerenzer and P. M. Todd. Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
17. A. Prince and P. Smolensky. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Wiley- Blackwell, 2004.
18. D. Marr. Vision. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
19. A. N. Sanborn, T. L. Griffiths, and D. J. Navarro. Rational approximations to rational models: Alternative algorithms for category learning. Psychological Review, 117:1144-1167, 2010.
20. L. Shi and T. L. Griffiths. Neural implementation of Bayesian inference by importance sampling. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems 22, 2009.