The interactive effects of simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses on plants: Mechanistic understanding from drought and pathogen combination

Journal of Plant Physiology

Volumn 176, Issue , 2015, Pages 47-54

  Ramegowda, Venkategowda ^a,c   Senthil Kumar, Muthappa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENOME RESEARCH   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Drought; Pathogen; Simultaneous stress; Tailored response

Indexed keywords

ABSCISIC ACID;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROUGHT; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PLANT;

ABSCISIC ACID; DROUGHTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84919934121     PISSN: 01761617     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.008     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Abuqamar S., Luo H., Laluk K., Mickelbart M.V., Mengiste T. Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by the AIM1 transcription factor. Plant J 2009, 58:347-360.
2. Achuo E.A., Prinsen E., Höfte M. Influence of drought, salt stress and abscisic acid on the resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and Oidium neolycopersici. Plant Pathol 2006, 55:178-186.
3. Adie B.A., Pérez-Pérez J., Pérez-Pérez M.M., Godoy M., Sánchez-Serrano J.J., Schmelz E.A., et al. ABA is an essential signal for plant resistance to pathogens affecting JA biosynthesis and the activation of defenses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19:1665-1681.
4. Ali M.A., Abbas A., Kreil D.P., Bohlmann H. Overexpression of the transcription factor RAP2.6 leads to enhanced callose deposition in syncytia and enhanced resistance against the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii in Arabidopsis roots. BMC Plant Biol 2013, 13:47.
5. Anderson J.P., Badruzsaufari E., Schenk P.M., Manners J.M., Desmond O.J., Ehlert C., et al. Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16:3460-3479.
6. Antico C., Colon C., Banks T., Ramonell K. Insights into the role of jasmonic acid-mediated defenses against necrotrophic and biotrophic fungal pathogens. Front Biol 2012, 7:48-56.
7. Asselbergh B., Achuo A.E., Höfte M., Van Gijsegem F. Abscisic acid deficiency leads to rapid activation of tomato defence responses upon infection with Erwinia chrysanthemi. Mol Plant Pathol 2008, 9:11-24.
8. Atkinson N.J., Urwin P.E. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:3523-3543.
9. Atkinson N.J., Lilley C.J., Urwin P.E. Identification of genes involved in the response of Arabidopsis to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:2028-2041.
10. Audenaert K., De Meyer G.B., Höfte M.M. Abscisic acid determines basal susceptibility of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and suppresses salicylic acid-dependent signaling mechanisms. Plant Physiol 2002, 128:491-501.
11. Besseau S., Li J., Palva E.T. WRKY54 and WRKY70 co-operate as negative regulators of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 2012, 63:2667-2679.
12. Bi G., Liebrand T.W.H., Cordewener J.H.G., America A.H.P., Xu X., Joosten M.H.A.J. Arabidopsis thaliana receptor-like protein AtRLP23 associates with the receptor-like kinase AtSOBIR1. Plant Signal Behav 2014, 9:e27937.
13. Blodgett J.T., Kruger E.L., Stanosz G.R. Sphaeropsis sapinea and water stress in a red pine plantation in central Wisconsin. Phytopathology 1997, 87:429-434.
14. Bonas U., Lahaye T. Plant disease resistance triggered by pathogen-derived molecules: refined models of specific recognition. Curr Opin Microbiol 2002, 5:44-50.
15. Bostock R.M., Pye M.F., Roubtsova T.V. Predisposition in plant disease: exploiting the nexus in abiotic and biotic stress perception and response. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2014, 52:517-549.
16. Carter A.H., Chen X.M., Garland-Campbell K., Kidwell K.K. Identifying QTL for high-temperature adult-plant resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in the spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar 'Louise'. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 119:1119-1128.
17. Chen X., Liu J., Lin G., Wang A., Wang Z., Lu G. Overexpression of AtWRKY28 and AtWRKY75 in Arabidopsis enhances resistance to oxalic acid and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Cell Rep 2013, 32:1589-1599.
18. Cho S.M., Kang B.R., Han S.H., Anderson A.J., Park J.Y., Lee Y.H., et al. 2R,3R-butanediol, a bacterial volatile produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6, is involved in induction of systemic tolerance to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2008, 21:1067-1075.
19. Collins N.C., Tardieu F., Tuberosa R. Quantitative trait loci and crop performance under abiotic stress: where do we stand?. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:469-486.
20. Conrath U., Pieterse C.M.J., Mauch-Mani B. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 2002, 7:210-216.
21. de Torres-Zabala M., Truman W., Bennett M.H., Lafforgue G., Mansfield J.W., Rodriguez Egea P., et al. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato hijacks the Arabidopsis abscisic acid signalling pathway to cause disease. EMBO J 2007, 26:1434-1443.
22. 2 in ABA-induced stomatal closure in Vicia faba L. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol 2005, 31:62-70.
23. Ellendorff U., Zhang Z., Thomma B.P. Gene silencing to investigate the roles of receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 2008, 3:893-896.
24. Fujita M., Fujita Y., Noutoshi Y., Takahashi F., Narusaka Y., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., et al. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2006, 9:436-442.
25. Gao Q.M., Venugopal S., Navarre D., Kachroo A. Low oleic acid-derived repression of jasmonic acid-inducible defense responses requires the WRKY50 and WRKY51 proteins. Plant Physiol 2011, 155:464-476.
26. Garrett K.A., Dendy S.P., Frank E.E., Rouse M.N., Travers S.E. Climate change effects on plant disease: genomes to ecosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2006, 44:489-509.
27. Gentleman R.C., Carey V.J., Bates D.M., Bolstad B., Dettling M., Dudoit S., et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. BMC Genome Biol 2004, 5:R80.
28. Idänheimo N., Gauthier A., Salojärvi J., Siligato R., Brosché M., Kollist H., et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases CRK6 and CRK7 protect against apoplastic oxidative stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014, 445:457-462.
29. Jacobs A.K., Lipka V., Burton R.A., Panstruga R., Strizhov N., Schulze-Lefert P., et al. An Arabidopsis callose synthase, GSL5, is required for wound and papillary callose formation. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2503-2513.
30. Jakab G., Ton J., Flors V., Zimmerli L., Metraux J.P., Mauch-Mani B. Enhancing Arabidopsis salt and drought stress tolerance by chemical priming for its abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:267-274.
31. Kendig S.R., Rupe J.C., Scott H.D. Effect of irrigation and soil water stress on densities of Macrophomina phaseolina in soil and roots of two soybean cultivars. Plant Dis 2000, 84:895-900.
32. Király L., Hafez Y.M., Fodor J., Király Z. Suppression of Tobacco mosaic virus-induced hypersensitive-type necrotization in tobacco at high temperature is associated with downregulation of NADPH oxidase and superoxide and stimulation of dehydroascorbate reductase. J Gen Virol 2008, 89:799-808.
33. Kissoudis C., van de Wiel C., Visser R.G.F., Van Der Linden G. Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci 2014, 5. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00207.
34. Lawlor D.W. Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J Exp Bot 2013, 64:83-108.
35. Lee S.J., Park J.H., Lee M.H., Yu J.H., Kim S.Y. Isolation and functional characterization of CE1 binding proteins. BMC Plant Biol 2010, 10:277.
36. Li Z., Zhang L., Yu Y., Quan R., Zhang Z., Zhang H., et al. The ethylene response factor AtERF11 that is transcriptionally modulated by the bZIP transcription factor HY5 is a crucial repressor for ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2011, 68:88-99.
37. Luo M., Liang X.Q., Dang P., Holbrook C.C., Bausher M.G., Lee R.D., et al. Microarray-based screening of differentially expressed genes in peanut in response to Aspergillus parasiticus infection and drought stress. Plant Sci 2005, 169:695-703.
38. Mao P., Duan M., Wei C., Li Y. WRKY62 transcription factor acts downstream of cytosolic NPR1 and negatively regulates jasmonate-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 2007, 48:833-842.
39. Mao X., Zhang H., Tian S., Chang X., Jing R. TaSnRK2.4, an SNF1-type serine/threonine protein kinase of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), confers enhanced multistress tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2010, 61:683-696.
40. Mauch-Mani B., Mauch F. The role of abscisic acid in plant-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2005, 8:409-414.
41. Maxwell D.L., Kruger E.L., Stanosz G.R. Effects of water stress on colonization of poplar stems and excised leaf discs by Septoria musiva. Phytopathology 1997, 87:381-388.
42. Mayek-Perez N., Garcia-Espinosa R., Lopez-Castaneda C., Acosta-Gallegos J.A., Simpson J. Water relations, histopathology and growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during pathogenesis of Macrophomina phaseolina under drought stress. Physiol Mol Plant P 2002, 60:185-195.
43. McElrone A.J., Forseth I.N. Photosynthetic responses of a temperate liana to Xylella fastidiosa infection and water stress. J Phytopathol 2004, 152:9-20.
44. McElrone A.J., Sherald J.L., Forseth I.N. Effects of water stress on symptomatology and growth of Parthenocissus quinquefolia infected by Xylella fastidiosa. Plant Disease 2001, 85:1160-1164.
45. McElrone A.J., Sherald J.L., Forseth I.N. Interactive effects of water stress and xylem-limited bacterial infection on the water relations of a host vine. J Exp Bot 2003, 54:419-430.
46. Melotto M., Underwood W., Koczan J., Nomura K., He S.Y. Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 2006, 126:969-980.
47. Mengiste T., Chen X., Salmeron J., Dietrich R. The BOTRYTIS SUSCEPTIBLE1 gene encodes an R2R3MYB transcription factor protein that is required for biotic and abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15:2551-2565.
48. Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 2006, 11:15-19.
49. Mittler R., Blumwald E. Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010, 61:443-462.
50. Mohr P.G., Cahill D.M. Abscisic acid influences the susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and Peronospora parasitica. Funct Plant Biol 2003, 30:461-469.
51. Montesano M., Brader G., Palva E.T. Pathogen derived elicitors: searching for receptors in plants. Mol Plant Pathol 2003, 4:73-79.
52. Moury B., Selassie K.G., Marchoux G., Daubèze A., Palloix A. High temperature effects on hypersensitive resistance to Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus (TSWV) in pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). Eur J Plant Pathol 1998, 104:489-498.
53. Narsai R., Wang C., Chen J., Wu J., Shou H., Whelan J. Antagonistic, overlapping and distinct responses to biotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa) and interactions with abiotic stress. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:93.
54. Nostar O., Ozdemir F., Bor M., Turkan I., Tosun N. Combined effects of salt stress and cucurbit downy mildew (Pseudoperospora cubensis Berk. and Curt. Rostov.) infection on growth, physiological traits and antioxidant activity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedling. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 2013, 83:84-92.
55. Olson A.J., Pataky J.K., D'Arcy C.J., Ford R.E. Effects of drought stress and infection by Maize dwarf mosaic virus on sweet corn. Plant Dis 1990, 74:147-151.
56. Pandey P., Sinha R., Mysore K.S., Senthil-Kumar M. Impact of concurrent drought stress and pathogen infection on plants. Combined stresses in plants: physiological, molecular, and biochemical aspects 2014, Springer International Publishing, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-319-07899-1_10. R. Mahalingam (Ed.).
57. Prasch C.M., Sonnewald U. Simultaneous application of heat, drought, and virus to Arabidopsis plants reveals significant shifts in signaling networks. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:1849-1866.
58. Prasch C.M., Sonnewald U. Signaling events in plants: stress factors in combination change the picture. Environ Exp Bot 2014, 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.020.
59. Ramegowda V., Senthil-Kumar M., Ishiga Y., Kaundal A., Udayakumar M., Mysore K.S. Drought stress scclimation imparts tolerance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Pseudomonas syringae in Nicotiana benthamiana. Int J Mol Sci 2013, 14:9497-9513.
60. Ramegowda V., Senthil-Kumar M., Udayakumar M., Kirankumar S.M. A high-throughput virus-induced gene silencing protocol identifies genes involved in multi-stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol 2013, 13:193.
61. Rasmussen S., Barah P., Suarez-Rodriguez M.C., Bressendorff S., Friis P., Costantino P., et al. Transcriptome responses to combinations of stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2013, 161:1783-1794.
62. Rezzonico E., Flury N., Meins F., Beffa R. Transcriptional down-regulation by abscisic acid of pathogenesis-related beta-1,3-glucanase genes in tobacco cell cultures. Plant Physiol 1998, 117:585-592.
63. Rivero R.M., Mestre T.C., Mittler R.O.N., Rubio F., Garcia-Sanchez F., Martinez V. The combined effect of salinity and heat reveals a specific physiological, biochemical and molecular response in tomato plants. Plant Cell Environ 2013, 37:1059-1073.
64. Scarpeci T.E., Zanor M.I., Mueller-Roeber B., Valle E.M. Overexpression of AtWRKY30 enhances abiotic stress tolerance during early growth stages in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 2013, 83:265-277.
65. Schön M., Töller A., Diezel C., Roth C., Westphal L., Wiermer M., et al. Analyses of wrky18 wrky40 plants reveal critical roles of SA/EDS1 signaling and indole-glucosinolate biosynthesis for Golovinomyces orontii resistance and a loss-of resistance towards Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato AvrRPS4. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2013, 26:758-767.
66. Senthil-Kumar M., Mysore K.S. New dimensions for VIGS in plant functional genomics. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:656-665.
67. Shaik R., Ramakrishna W. Genes and co-expression modules common to drought and bacterial stress responses in Arabidopsis and rice. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e77261.
68. Shaik R., Ramakrishna W. Machine learning approaches distinguish multiple stress conditions using stress-responsive genes and identify candidate genes for broad resistance in rice. Plant Physiol 2014, 164:481-495.
69. Sharma R.C., Duveiller E., Ortiz-Ferrara G. Progress and challenge towards reducing wheat spot blotch threat in the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: is climate change already taking its toll?. Field Crop Res 2007, 103:109-118.
70. Sharma R., De Vleesschauwer D., Sharma M.K., Ronald P.C. Recent advances in dissecting stress-regulatory crosstalk in rice. Mol Plant 2013, 6:250-260.
71. Shinozaki K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K., Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003, 6:410-417.
72. Singh D.P., Moore C.A., Gilliland A., Carr J.P. Activation of multiple antiviral defence mechanisms by salicylic acid. Mol Plant Pathol 2004, 5:57-63.
73. Sreenivasulu N., Sopory S.K., Kavi Kishor P.B. Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 2007, 388:1-13.
74. Suzuki N., Rizhsky L., Liang H., Shuman J., Shulaev V., Mittler R. Enhanced tolerance to environmental stress in transgenic plants expressing the transcriptional coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1c. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:1313-1322.
75. Suzuki N., Rivero R.M., Shulaev V., Blumwald E., Mittler R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol 2014, 203:32-43.
76. Tippmann H.F., Schlüter U., Collinge D.B. Common themes in biotic and abiotic stress signalling in plants 2006, Global Science Books, Middlesex, UK.
77. Ton J., Mauch-Mani B. Beta-amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant J 2004, 38:119-130.
78. Ton J., Jakab G., Toquin V., Flors V., Iavicoli A., Maeder M.N., et al. Dissecting the beta-aminobutyric acid-induced priming phenomenon in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:987-999.
79. van Hulten M., Pelser M., van Loon L.C., Pieterse C.M.J., Ton J. Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:5602-5607.
80. Wang G., Ellendorff U., Kemp B., Mansfield J.W., Forsyth A., Mitchell K., et al. A genome-wide functional investigation into the roles of receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2008, 147:503-517.
81. Wang Y., Bao Z., Zhu Y., Hua J. Analysis of temperature modulation of plant defense against biotrophic microbes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2009, 22:498-506.
82. Widjaja I., Lassowskat I., Bethke G., Eschen-Lippold L., Long H.-H., Naumann K., et al. A protein phosphatase 2C, responsive to the bacterial effector AvrRpm1 but not to the AvrB effector, regulates defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2010, 61:249-258.
83. Wiese J., Kranz T., Schubert S. Induction of pathogen resistance in barley by abiotic stress. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2004, 6:529-536.
84. Xu P., Chen F., Mannas J.P., Feldman T., Sumner L.W., Roossinck M.J. Virus infection improves drought tolerance. New Phytol 2008, 180:911-921.
85. Zhang W., Fraiture M., Kolb D., Löffelhardt B., Desaki Y., Boutrot F.F., et al. Arabidopsis receptor-like protein30 and receptor-like kinase suppressor of BIR1-1/EVERSHED mediate innate immunity to necrotrophic fungi. Plant Cell 2013, 25:4227-4241.
86. Zhu Q., Zhang J., Gao X., Tong J., Xiao L., Li W., et al. The Arabidopsis AP2/ERF transcription factor RAP2.6 participates in ABA, salt and osmotic stress responses. Gene 2010, 457:1-12.