Testing DNA barcode performance in 1000 species of European Lepidoptera: Large geographic distances have small genetic impacts

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Huemer, Peter ^a   Mutanen, Marko ^b   Sefc, Kristina M ^c   Hebert, Paul D N ^d  

^a Tiroler Landesmuseen BetriebsgesmbH   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; DNA;

ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BARCODING; FINLAND; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; INTROGRESSION; LEPIDOPTERA; NONHUMAN; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TAXONOMY; WOLBACHIA; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES;

LEPIDOPTERA; WOLBACHIA;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; GEOGRAPHY; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 84919897838     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115774     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 313-321.
2. Hebert PDN, deWaard JR, Landry JF (2009) DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biology Letters 6: 359-362. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.084
3. Bucklin A, Steinke D, Blanco-Bercial L (2011) DNA barcoding of marine Metazoa. Annual Review of Marine Sciences 3: 471-508. doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-080950
4. Smith A, Fernández-Triana JL, Eveleigh E, Gómez J, Guclu C, et al. (2012) DNA barcoding and the taxonomy of Microgastrinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae): impacts after 8 years and nearly 20 000 sequences. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 168-176.
5. Virgilio M, Backeljau T, Nevado B, De Meyer M (2010) Comparative performances of DNA barcoding across insect orders. BMC Bioinformatics 11(1): 206.
6. Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E (2007) A comprehensive DNA library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 530-542.
7. Bergsten J, Bilton DT, Fujisawa T, Elliott M, Monaghan MT, et al. (2012) The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding. Systematic Biology 61: 851-869. doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys037.
8. Nieukerken EJ, Kaila L, Kitching IJ, Kristensen NP, Lees DC, et al. (2011) Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang, Z. -Q. (Ed.), Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148: 212-221.
9. Hebert PDN, deWaard JR, Zakharov EV, Prosser SWJ, Sones JE, et al. (2013) A DNA 'Barcode Blitz': Rapid digitization and sequencing of a natural history collection. PLoS ONE 8(7): e68535. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068535
10. deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Humble LM (2011) A comprehensive DNA barcode library for the looper moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada. PLoS ONE 6: e18290.
11. Dinca V, Zakharov EV, Hebert PDN, Vila R (2011) Complete DNA barcode reference library for a country's butterfly fauna reveals high performance for temperate Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 278: 347-355.
12. Hausmann A, Haszprunar G, Hebert PDN (2011) DNA barcoding the geometrid fauna of Bavaria (Lepidoptera): Successes, surprises, and questions. PLoS ONE 6: e17134.
13. Hausmann A, Godfray HCJ, Huemer P, Mutanen M, Rougerie R, et al. (2013) Genetic patterns in European geometrid moths revealed by the Barcode Index Number (BIN) System. PLoS ONE 8(12): e84518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084518.
14. Lukhtanov VA, Sourakov A, Zakharov EV, Hebert PDN (2009) DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1302-1310.
15. Mutanen M, Kaila L, Tabell J (2013) Wide-ranging barcoding aids discovery of one-third increase of species richness in presumably well-investigated moths. Scientific Reports 3: 2901. doi: 10.1038/srep02901.
16. Čandek K, Kuntner M (2014) DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Molecular Ecology Resources, doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12304
17. Zahiri R, Lafontaine JD, Schmidt BC, deWaard JR, Zakharov EV, et al. (2014) A transcontinental challenge - A test of DNA barcode performance for 1541 species of Canadian Noctuoidea (Lepidoptera). PLoS ONE: 9(3): e92797. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092797.
18. Mutanen M, Hausmann A, Hebert PDN, Landry JF, deWaard JR, et al. (2012) Allopatry as a Gordian knot for taxonomists: Patterns of DNA barcode divergence in arctic-alpine Lepidoptera. PLOS ONE 7(10): e47214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047214.
19. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System. PLoS ONE 8: e66213.
20. Kullberg J (2008) Suomen perhosten luettelo - päivitetty versio. Checklist of Finnish Lepidoptera - an updated version. Available: http://www.luomus.fi/elaintiede/hyonteiset/perhoset/
21. Huemer P (2013) Die Schmetterlinge Österreichs (Lepidoptera). Systematische und faunistische Checkliste. Studiohefte 12, Innsbruck, Austria, 304 pp.
22. deWaard JR, Ivanova NV, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2008) Assembling DNA Barcodes: Analytical Protocols. Pp. 275-293 In: Cristofre, M, ed. Methods in Molecular Biology: Environmental Genetics.Humana Press Inc., Totowa, USA, 364 pp.
23. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Available: http://www.barcodinglife.org. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355-364.
24. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731-2739.
25. Buszko J, Nowacki J (2000) The Lepidoptera of Poland. A Distributional Checklist. Polish Entomological Monographs 1: 1-178.
26. Gaedike R, Heinicke W (1999) Verzeichnis der Schmetterlinge Deutschlands. Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte, Beiheft 5: 1-216.
27. Ivinskis P (2004) Lepidoptera of Lithuania. Annotated catalogue. Vilniaus universiteto Ekologijos instituto leidykla, 380 pp.
28. Jürivete U, Õunap E (2008) Estonian Lepidoptera, Catalogue. Estonian Lepidopterologistsz Society, Tallinn, 175 pp.
29. Laštu˚vka Z, Liška J (2011) Annotated checklist of moths and butterflies of the Czech Republic (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Biocont Laboratory spol. s r.o., Brno, 146 pp.
30. Savenkov N, Šulcs I (2010) Latvian Lepidoptera, Catalogue. Estonian Lepidopterologistsz Society, Tallinn, 176 pp.
31. Sinev SY (2008) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia. Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., St. Peterburg, Moscow, 424 pp.
32. Kudrna O, Harpe A, Lux C, Pennerstorfer J, Schweiger O, et al. (2011) Distribution Atlas of Butterflies in Europe. Delta Druck & Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Peks, Schwanfeld, 576 pp.
33. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2014) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models-. R package version 3.1-117. Available:http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
34. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available:http://www.R-project.org/.
35. Ratnasingham S (2013) BOLD Barcode of Life Data System, Version 3. Available: http://www.boldsystems.org/views/login.php. Accessed 2014 Apr 17.
36. Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM, Hallwach W, Remigio E, et al. (2005) Wedding biodiversity of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360(1462): 1835-1845. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1715
37. Hausmann A, Haszprunar G, Segerer AH, Speidel W, Behounek G, et al. (2011) Now DNA-barcoded: the butterflies and larger moths of Germany (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera, Macroheterocera). Spixiana 34(1): 47-58.
38. Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 397-423.
39. Hilgenboecker K, Hammerstein P, Schlattmann P, Telschow A, Werren JH (2008) How many species are infected with Wolbachia?- A statistical analysis of current data. FEMS Microbiology Letters 281: 215-220.
40. Kodandaramaiah U, Somonsen TJ, Bromilow S, Wahlberg N, Sperling F (2013) Deceptive single-locus taxonomy and phylogeography: Wolbachia-associated divergence in mitochondrial DNA is not reflected in morphology and nuclear markers in a butterfly species. Ecology and Evolution 3(16): 5167-5176. doi:10.1002/ece3.886
41. Ritter S, Michalski SG, Settele J, Wiemers M, Fric ZF, et al. (2013) Wolbachia infections mimic cryptic speciation in two parasitic butterfly species, Phengaris teleius and P. nausithous (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). PLoS ONE 8(11): e78107. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078107
42. Schintlmeister A (2008) Palaearctic Macrolepidoptera Volume 1. Notodontidae. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 482 pp.
43. Leneveu J, Chichvarkhin A, Wahlberg N (2009) Varying rates of diversification in the genus Melitaea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) during the past 20 million years. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 97: 346-361.
44. Lopez-Vaamonde C, Agassiz D, Augustin S, De Prins J, De Prins W, et al. (2010) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. Lepidoptera. Chapter 11. BioRisk 4 (special issue): 603-668.
45. Pentinsaari M, Hebert PDN, Mutanen M (2014) Barcoding beetles: A regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences. PLoS ONE: 9(9): e108651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108651.