The rise of moral cognition

Cognition

Volumn 135, Issue , 2015, Pages 39-42

  Greene, Joshua D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Moral cognition; Moral judgment; Morality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; MACHINE; MORALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; THINKING; VISUAL CORTEX; DECISION MAKING;

COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MORALS;

EID: 84919883750     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Amit E., Greene J.D. You see, the ends don't justify the means visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science 2012, 23(8):861-868.
2. Bartels D.M. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition 2008, 108(2):381-417.
3. Bartels D.M., Kvaran T., Nichols S. Selfless giving. Cognition 2013, 129(2):392-403.
4. Bartels D.M., Pizarro D.A. The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition 2011, 121(1):154-161.
5. Blair R.J.R. A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investigating the psychopath. Cognition 1995, 57(1):1-29.
6. Blake P.R., McAuliffe K. "I had so much it didn't seem fair": Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition 2011, 120(2):215-224.
7. Caruso E.M., Gino F. Blind ethics: Closing one's eyes polarizes moral judgments and discourages dishonest behavior. Cognition 2011, 118(2):280-285.
8. Civai C., Corradi-Dell'Acqua C., Gamer M., Rumiati R.I. Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition 2010, 114(1):89-95.
9. Cohen Priva U., Austerweil J.L. Analyzing the history of Cognition using topic models. Cognition 2015, 135:4-9.
10. Cushman F. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 2008, 108(2):353-380.
11. Cushman F. Action, outcome, and value a dual-system framework for morality. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2013, 17(3):273-292.
12. Cushman F., Knobe J., Sinnott-Armstrong W. Moral appraisals affect doing/allowing judgments. Cognition 2008, 108(1):281-289.
13. Cushman F., Sheketoff R., Wharton S., Carey S. The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition 2013, 127(1):6-21.
14. DeScioli P., Kurzban R. Mysteries of morality. Cognition 2009, 112(2):281-299.
15. Duke A.A., Bègue L. The drunk utilitarian: Blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas. Cognition 2015, 134:121-127.
16. Frank R.H. Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions 1988, WW Norton & Co.
17. Friedman O., Neary K.R. Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession?. Cognition 2008, 107(3):829-849.
18. Gerstenberg T., Lagnado D.A. Spreading the blame: The allocation of responsibility amongst multiple agents. Cognition 2010, 115(1):166-171.
19. Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life 2005, MIT Press. H. Gintis (Ed.).
20. Goodwin G.P., Darley J.M. The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition 2008, 106(3):1339-1366.
21. Gray K. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: Comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014). Cognition 2014, 133(1):329-331.
22. Greene J. Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them 2013, Penguin.
23. Greene J.D., Cushman F.A., Stewart L.E., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition 2009, 111(3):364-371.
24. Greene J.D. The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision-making. The cognitive neurosciences V 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
25. Greene J.D., Morelli S.A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., Cohen J.D. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition 2008, 107(3):1144-1154.
26. Gummerum M., Chu M.T. Outcomes and intentions in children's, adolescents', and adults' second-and third-party punishment behavior. Cognition 2014, 133(1):97-103.
27. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 2001, 108(4):814.
28. Haidt J. The Righteous Mind: Why good people are divided by religion and politics 2012, Pantheon, New York.
29. Haidt J., Koller S.H., Dias M.G. Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65(4):613.
30. Hamlin J.K. Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants' social evaluations. Cognition 2013, 128(3):451-474.
31. Hauser M.D. The liver and the moral organ. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2006, 1(3):214-220.
32. Experimental philosophy 2008, Oxford University Press. J. Knobe, S. Nichols (Eds.).
33. Experimental philosophy 2013, Oxford University Press, (Vol. 2). J. Knobe, S. Nichols (Eds.).
34. Knobe J. Philosophers are doing something different now: Quantitative data. Cognition 2015, 135:36-38.
35. McAuliffe K., Jordan J.J., Warneken F. Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition 2015, 134:1-10.
36. Meristo M., Surian L. Do infants detect indirect reciprocity?. Cognition 2013, 129(1):102-113.
37. Mikhail J. Elements of moral cognition: Rawls' linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment 2011, Cambridge University Press.
38. Mills C.M., Keil F.C. Children's developing notions of (im) partiality. Cognition 2008, 107(2):528-551.
39. Nahmias E., Shepard J., Reuter S. It's OK if 'my brain made me do it': People's intuitions about free will and neuroscientific prediction. Cognition 2014, 133(2):502-516.
40. Nichols S. Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition 2002, 84(2):221-236.
41. Nichols S., Folds-Bennett T. Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties. Cognition 2003, 90(2):B23-B32.
42. Nichols S., Mallon R. Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition 2006, 100(3):530-542.
43. Olson K.R., Spelke E.S. Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition 2008, 108(1):222-231.
44. Pastötter B., Gleixner S., Neuhauser T., Bäuml K.H.T. To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame. Cognition 2013, 126(3):373-377.
45. Paxton J.M., Ungar L., Greene J.D. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science 2012, 36(1):163-177.
46. Piazza J., Sousa P., Holbrook C. Authority dependence and judgments of utilitarian harm. Cognition 2013, 128(3):261-270.
47. Pietraszewski D., German T.C. Coalitional psychology on the playground: Reasoning about indirect social consequences in preschoolers and adults. Cognition 2013, 126(3):352-363.
48. Rossano F., Rakoczy H., Tomasello M. Young children's understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition 2011, 121(2):219-227.
49. Rottman J., Kelemen D. Aliens behaving badly: Children's acquisition of novel purity-based morals. Cognition 2012, 124(3):356-360.
50. Rottman J., Kelemen D., Young L. Tainting the soul: Purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide. Cognition 2014, 130(2):217-226.
51. Royzman E.B., Leeman R.F., Baron J. Unsentimental ethics: Towards a content-specific account of the moral-conventional distinction. Cognition 2009, 112(1):159-174.
52. Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., Haidt J. The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 76(4):574.
53. Schmidt M.F., Rakoczy H., Tomasello M. Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation. Cognition 2012, 124(3):325-333.
54. Shenhav A., Greene J.D. Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron 2010, 67(4):667-677.
55. Sheskin M., Bloom P., Wynn K. Anti-equality: Social comparison in young children. Cognition 2014, 130(2):152-156.
56. Sousa P., Holbrook C., Piazza J. The morality of harm. Cognition 2009, 113(1):80-92.
57. Stich S., Fessler D.M., Kelly D. On the morality of harm: A response to Sousa, Holbrook and Piazza. Cognition 2009, 113(1):93-97.
58. Strohminger N., Lewis R.L., Meyer D.E. Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment. Cognition 2011, 119(2):295-300.
59. Strohminger N., Nichols S. The essential moral self. Cognition 2014, 131(1):159-171.
60. Suter R.S., Hertwig R. Time and moral judgment. Cognition 2011, 119(3):454-458.
61. Trémolière B., Neys W.D., Bonnefon J.F. Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. Cognition 2012, 124(3):379-384.
62. Uhlmann E.L., Zhu L.L., Tannenbaum D. When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Cognition 2013, 126(2):326-334.
63. Uttich K., Lombrozo T. Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect. Cognition 2010, 116(1):87-100.
64. Warneken F. Young children proactively remedy unnoticed accidents. Cognition 2013, 126(1):101-108.
65. Wiech K., Kahane G., Shackel N., Farias M., Savulescu J., Tracey I. Cold or calculating? Reduced activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex reflects decreased emotional aversion to harming in counterintuitive utilitarian judgment. Cognition 2013, 126(3):364-372.
66. Wiegmann A., Waldmann M.R. Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: A causal model theory. Cognition 2014, 131(1):28-43.
67. Woolfolk R.L., Doris J.M., Darley J.M. Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: Studies in the attribution of moral responsibility. Cognition 2006, 100(2):283-301.
68. Young L., Cushman F., Hauser M., Saxe R. The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104(20):8235-8240.
69. Young L., Phillips J. The paradox of moral focus. Cognition 2011, 119(2):166-178.
70. Young L., Saxe R. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains. Cognition 2011, 120(2):202-214.