Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 212, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 9-17

  Scheel, John R ^a   Lee, Janie M ^a   Sprague, Brian L ^b   Lee, Christoph I ^a   Lehman, Constance D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

adjunctive screening; breast density legislation; dense breasts; screening breast ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); BREAST TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84919415899     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.048     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. F.M. Hall Breast density legislation Radiology 266 2013 997 998
2. C.I. Lee, L.W. Bassett, and C.D. Lehman Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research Radiology 264 2012 632 636
3. S.F. Dehkordy, and R.C. Carlos Dense breast legislation in the United States: state of the States J Am Coll Radiol 10 2013 899 902
4. N.M. Cappello Decade of "normal" mammography reports-the happygram J Am Coll Radiol 10 2013 903 908
5. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS - Mammography ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas 2013 American College of Radiology Reston, VA
6. K. Kerlikowske, R.A. Hubbard, and D.L. Miglioretti Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study Ann Intern Med 155 2011 493 502
7. N. Houssami, and S. Ciatto The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening Prev Med 53 2011 123 126
8. M.R. Lander, and L. Tabar Automated 3-D breast ultrasound as a promising adjunctive screening tool for examining dense breast tissue Semin Roentgenol 46 2011 302 308
9. W.A. Berg, Z. Zhang, and D. Lehrer Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk JAMA 307 2012 1394 1404
10. V. Corsetti, N. Houssami, and M. Ghirardi Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up Eur J Cancer 47 2011 1021 1026
11. F. Stoblen, S. Landt, R. Stelkens-Gebhardt, J. Sehouli, M. Rezai, and S. Kummel First evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of an automated 3D ultrasound system in a breast screening setting Anticancer Res 31 2011 2569 2574
12. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 2002 165 175
13. I. Leconte, C. Feger, and C. Galant Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 2003 1675 1679
14. P. Crystal, S.D. Strano, S. Shcharynski, and M.J. Koretz Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 2003 177 182
15. C. De Felice, S. Savelli, and M. Angeletti Diagnostic utility of combined ultrasonography and mammography in the evaluation of women with mammographically dense breasts J Ultrasound 10 2007 143 151
16. B. Brancato, R. Bonardi, and S. Catarzi Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts Tumori 93 2007 562 566
17. V. Corsetti, N. Houssami, and A. Ferrari Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost Eur J Cancer 44 2008 539 544
18. W.A. Berg, J.D. Blume, and J.B. Cormack Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2151 2163
19. L.C. Leong, A. Gogna, R. Pant, F.C. Ng, and L.S. Sim Supplementary breast ultrasound screening in Asian women with negative but dense mammograms-a pilot study Ann Acad Med Singapore 41 2012 432 439
20. R.J. Hooley, K.L. Greenberg, R.M. Stackhouse, J.L. Geisel, R.S. Butler, and L.E. Philpotts Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41 Radiology 265 2012 59 69
21. J. Weigert, and S. Steenbergen The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts Breast J 18 2012 517 522
22. T. Parris, D. Wakefield, and H. Frimmer Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458 Breast J 19 2013 64 70
23. V. Girardi, M. Tonegutti, S. Ciatto, and F. Bonetti Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography Breast 22 2013 806 809
24. K.M. Kelly, J. Dean, W.S. Comulada, and S.J. Lee Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts Eur Radiol 20 2010 734 742
25. V. Giuliano, and C. Giuliano Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts Clin Imaging 37 2013 480 486
26. R.D. Rosenberg, B.C. Yankaskas, and L.A. Abraham Performance benchmarks for screening mammography Radiology 241 2006 55 66
27. C.H. Lee, D.D. Dershaw, and D. Kopans Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer J Am Coll Radiol 7 2010 18 27
28. M.B. Mainiero, A. Lourenco, and M.C. Mahoney ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening J Am Coll Radiol 10 2013 11 14
29. M. Nothacker, V. Duda, and M. Hahn Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review BMC Cancer 9 2009 335
30. K.L. Maughan, M.A. Lutterbie, and P.S. Ham Treatment of breast cancer Am Fam Phys 81 2010 1339 1346
31. R.T. Senie, M. Lesser, D.W. Kinne, and P.P. Rosen Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma Cancer 73 1994 1666 1672
32. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review Lancet 380 2012 1778 1786
33. United States Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act and Program Facility Scorecard. 2013. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/DocumentArchives/ucm337647.htm. Accessed Sept. 13, 2013.
34. U. Fischer, F. Baum, and S. Obenauer Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography Eur Radiol 12 2002 2679 2683
35. E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, and E. Hendrick Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med 353 2005 1773 1783
36. P.A. Carney, D.L. Miglioretti, and B.C. Yankaskas Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 2003 168 175