Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 480-486

  Giuliano, Vincenzo ^a   Giuliano, Concetta ^a  

^a NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3 dimensional sonography; Breast cancer; Breast screening; Breast ultrasound; Cancer detection; Dense breast

Indexed keywords

3-DIMENSIONAL SONOGRAPHY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SCREENING; BREAST ULTRASOUND; CANCER DETECTION; DENSE BREAST;

DIAGNOSIS; DISEASES; ULTRASONICS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DENSITOMETRY; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875720872     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: 18734499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, et al. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns: a study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller. Cancer 1985, 56:1280-1286.
2. Wolfe JN Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976, 126:1130-1137.
3. Wolfe JN Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 1976, 37:2486-2492.
4. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, et al. Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer. Prospective data from the Nurses' Health Study. JAMA 1993, 270:338-343.
5. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989, 81:1879-1886.
6. Seidman H, Stellman SD, Mushinski MH A different perspective on breast cancer risk factors: some implications of the nonattributable risk. CA Cancer J Clin 1982, 32:301-313.
7. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R Ten to 14-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982, 69:349-355.
8. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographicdetection: comparison of interval and screen detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1081-1087.
9. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:227-236.
10. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoik-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999, 173:921-927.
11. Kopans DB Breast cancer screening with ultrasonography. Lancet 1999, 354:2096-2097.
12. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography versus mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008, 299:2151-2163.
13. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:734-742.
14. United States Food and Drug Organization. Breast transilluminators. 74 FR 16214, April 9, 2009; Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001, April 12, 2012.
15. D'Orsi C, Bassett L, Berg W, et al. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA. 4th ed.
16. Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease. Radiology 2002, 222:536-542.
17. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann Intern Med 1981, 94:555-600.
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
19. Metz CE Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978, 1978:283-298.
20. Centers for Medicare, Medicaid Contracted intermediary carrier fee schedule 2004, First Coast Service Options, Inc., St. Augustine, FL.
21. Kuroishi T, Tominaga S, Morimoto T, et al. Tumor growth rate and prognosis of breast cancer mainly detected by mass screening. Jpn J Cancer Res 1990, 81:454-462.
22. Heuser L, Spratt JS, Polk HC Growth rate of primary breast cancer. Cancer 1979, 43:1888-1894.
23. Michaelson JS, Halpern E, Kopans DB Breast cancer computer simulation method for estimating optimal intervals for screening. Radiology 1999, 212:551-560.
24. Subramanian S, Trogdon J, Ekwueme D.U., et al. Cost of breast cancer treatment in Medicaid, implications for state programs providing coverage for low-income women. Med Care 2011, 49:89-95.
25. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003, 12:332-338.
26. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87:1622-1629.
27. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987, 148:1087-1092.
28. Boyd NF, O'Sullivan B, Campbell JE, et al. Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1982, 45:185-193.
29. Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 1991, 67:2833-2838.
30. Dongola N Mammography in breast cancer Accessed May 17, 2012, at:. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/346529-overview.