ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 11-14

  Mainiero, Martha B ^a   Lourenco, Ana ^a   Mahoney, Mary C ^b   Newell, Mary S ^c   Bailey, Lisa ^d,e   Barke, Lora D ^f   D'Orsi, Carl ^c   Harvey, Jennifer A ^g   Hayes, Mary K ^h   Huynh, Phan Tuong ⁱ   Jokich, Peter M ^j   Lee, Su Ju ^b   Lehman, Constance D ^k   Mankoff, David A ^k,l   Nepute, Joshua A ^m   Patel, Samir B ⁿ   Reynolds, Handel E ^o   Sutherland, M Linda ^p   Haffty, Bruce G ^q  

^a RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d Imagimed LLC   (United States)

^e AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS   (United States)

^f INVISION SALLY JOBE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h MEMORIAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ ST LUKE S EPISCOPAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j Rush Breast Imaging Center   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^l Society of Nuclear Medicine   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁿ Radiology Inc   (United States)

^o Radiology Association of Atlanta   (United States)

^p Newport Diagnostic Center   (United States)

^q ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Appropriateness criteria; breast cancer; breast MRI; breast ultrasound; mammography; screening

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SCINTISCANNING; CANCER SCREENING; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

EID: 84928096243     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: 1558349X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.036     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1 Further confirmation with extended data Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 2006 45 51
2. S.W. Duffy, L. Tabar, H.H. Chen The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties Cancer 95 2002 458 469
3. R.E. Hendrick, R.A. Smith, J.H. Rutledge III, C.R. Smart Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997 87 92
4. L. Tabar, B. Vitak, H.H. Chen, M.F. Yen, S.W. Duffy, R.A. Smith Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 91 2001 1724 1731
5. C.H. Lee, D.D. Dershaw, D. Kopans Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer J Am Coll Radiol 7 2010 18 27
6. W.A. Berg Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? Am J Roentgenol 192 2009 390 399
7. C.T. Brekelmans, C. Seynaeve, C.C. Bartels Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk J Clin Oncol 19 2001 924 930
8. P.L. Chart, E. Franssen Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: preliminary results from a new program CMAJ 157 1997 1235 1242
9. R.D. Macmillan Screening women with a family history of breast cancer - results from the British Familial Breast Cancer Group Eur J Surg Oncol 26 2000 149 152
10. L. Scheuer, N. Kauff, M. Robson Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers J Clin Oncol 20 2002 1260 1268
11. E. Warner, D.B. Plewes, R.S. Shumak Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer J Clin Oncol 19 2001 3524 3531
12. A.I. Hagen, K.A. Kvistad, L. Maehle Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series Breast 16 2007 367 374
13. A.R. Hartman, B.L. Daniel, A.W. Kurian Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma Cancer 100 2004 479 489
14. M. Kriege, C.T. Brekelmans, C. Boetes Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition Cancer 106 2006 2318 2326
15. C.K. Kuhl, S. Schrading, C.C. Leutner Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 23 2005 8469 8476
16. M.O. Leach, C.R. Boggis, A.K. Dixon Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) Lancet 365 2005 1769 1778
17. C.D. Lehman, C. Isaacs, M.D. Schnall Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study Radiology 244 2007 381 388
18. F. Sardanelli, F. Podo, G. D'Agnolo Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results Radiology 242 2007 698 715
19. E. Warner, D.B. Plewes, K.A. Hill Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination JAMA 292 2004 1317 1325
20. S.K. Plevritis, A.W. Kurian, B.M. Sigal Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging JAMA 295 2006 2374 2384
21. C. Taneja, J. Edelsberg, D. Weycker, A. Guo, G. Oster, J. Weinreb Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women J Am Coll Radiol 6 2009 171 179
22. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, W. Burke American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 2007 75 89
23. S. Brennan, L. Liberman, D.D. Dershaw, E. Morris Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 510 516
24. J.S. Sung, S.F. Malak, P. Bajaj, R. Alis, D.D. Dershaw, E.A. Morris Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ Radiology 261 2011 414 420
25. W.A. Berg, J.D. Blume, J.B. Cormack Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2151 2163
26. R.E. Hendrick Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies Radiology 257 2010 246 253
27. M.K. O'Connor, H. Li, D.J. Rhodes, C.B. Hruska, C.B. Clancy, R.J. Vetter Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast Medical physics 37 2010 6187 6198
28. American College of Radiology Manual on contrast media v7 http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/ Contrast%20Manual/FullManual.pdf Accessed November 14, 2012
29. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: radiation dose assessment introduction http://www.acr.org/∼/media/ A27A29133302408BB86888EAFD460A1F.pdf Accessed September 19, 2012