Analysis of the definition and utility of personal health records using Q methodology

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Kim, Jeongeun ^a,b   Bates, David W ^b,c,d  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d PARTNERS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

P sample; Personal health record; Q sample; Q statement; Qualitative research; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SECURITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; STATISTICS;

COMPUTER SECURITY; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84859890267     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1781     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Yamin CK, Emani S, Williams DH, Lipsitz SR, Karson AS, Wald JS, et al. The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med 2011 Mar 28;171(6):568-574. [doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.34] [Medline: 21444847]
2. KorMedi. KoreaMedicare. 2010 Jul 26. Increase of Satisfaction Towards the PHR (in Korean)URL: http://www.kormedi.com/ news/article/1197188-2892.html [accessed 2010-07-26] [WebCite Cache ID 5rWfAXmDl]
3. National Information Society Agency. A Study on Market Research and Value Chain of u-Health Services. In: NIA II-RER-07075. Seoul, Korea: NISA; 2007.
4. HIMSS Board of Directors. Healthcare Information Management and Systems Society. 2007 Sep 28. HIMSS Personal Health Records Definition and Position StatementURL: http://www.himss.org/content/files/PHRDefinition071707.pdf [accessed 2010-12-17] [WebCite Cache ID 5v3H2FgeV]
5. Jones DA, Shipman JP, Plaut DA, Selden CR. Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force. J Med Libr Assoc 2010 Jul;98(3):243-249. [doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.013] [Medline: 20648259]
6. Kim J, Jung H, Bates DW. History and trends of "personal health record" research in PubMed. Healthc Inform Res 2011 Mar;17(1):3-17. [doi: 10.4258/hir.2011.17.1.3] [Medline: 21818452]
7. Stephenson W. Application of communication theory: the substructure of science. Psychol Rec 1972;22:17-36.
8. International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity. 2011 Aug 04. Q MethodologyURL: http://qmethod.org/about [accessed 2011-08-04] [WebCite Cache ID 60g674JTW]
9. Brown SR. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1980.
10. Thompson GC. The evaluation of public opinion. In: Berelson B, Janowitz M, editors. Reader in Public Opinion and Communication. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Free Press; 1966:7-12.
11. Schmolck P. University of the Federal Armed Forces Munich. 2010 May 02. The QMethod PageURL: http://www. lrz-muenchen.de/~schmolck/qmethod/[WebCite Cache ID 5pRJnFkGy]
12. Xu CY, Kim KI. Study of cultural adaptation and attitude of Chinese students in Korea using Q method. Ment Health Res 1997;16:166-180.