Framing doctoral pedagogy as design and action

Reshaping Doctoral Education: International Approaches and Pedagogies

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 3-11

  Danby, Susan ^a   Lee, Alison ^b  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918884332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203142783     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Austin, A. E. (2011) ‘Preparing doctoral students for promising careers in a changing context: Implications for supervision, institutional planning, and cross-institutional opportunities’. In V. Kumar and A. Lee (eds), Doctoral education in international context: Connecting local, regional and international perspectives (pp. 1-18). Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.
2. Baker, C. D. (2000) ‘Locating culture in action: Membership categorisation in texts and talk’. In A. Lee and C. Poynton (eds), Culture and text: Discourse and methodology in social research and cultural studies (pp. 99-113). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
3. Bitusikova, S. (2009) ‘New challenges in doctoral education in Europe’. In D. Boud and A. Lee (eds), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 200-210). London: Routledge.
4. Callejo Perez, D. M., Fain, S. M. and Slater, J. J. (2011) Higher education and human capital: Re/thinking the doctorate. Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
5. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A. and Yahia, M. (2011) ‘Education: The PhD factory, news feature’, Nature, 472: 276-279.
6. Danby, S. (2005) ‘The supervisory experience: Culture in action’. In J. Yamanashi and I. Milojevic (eds), Researching identity, diversity and education: Surpassing the norm (pp. 1-16). Queensland: Post Pressed.
7. Danby, S. and Baker, C. D. (2000) ‘Unravelling the fabric of social order in block area’. In S. Hester and D. Francis (eds), Local educational order: Ethnomethodologicalstudies of knowledge in action (pp. 91-140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Evans, T. and Green, B. (1995) Dancing at a distance? Postgraduate studies, ‘supervision’, and distance education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Hobart, November.
9. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Gherardi, S. (2001) ‘From organizational learning to practice-based knowing’, Human Relations, 54 (1): 131-139.
11. Gherardi, S. (2009) ‘Community of practice or practices of a community?’ In S. Armstrong and C. Fukami (eds), Handbook of management learning, education and development (pp. 514-530). London: Sage.
12. Gilbert, R. (2004) ‘A framework for evaluating the doctoral curriculum’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (3): 299-310.
13. Green, B. (2005) ‘Unfinished business: Subjectivity and supervision’, Higher Education Research and Development, 24 (2): 151-163.
14. Green, B. and Lee, A. (1995) ‘Theorising postgraduate pedagogy’, The Australian Universities Review, 38 (2): 40-45.
15. Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997) ‘Membership categorization analysis: An introduction’. In S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds), Culture in action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 1-23). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.
16. Johnson, L., Lee, A. and Green, B. (2000) ‘The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy’, Studies in Higher Education, 25 (2): 135-147.
17. Kamler, B. and Thomson, P. (2006) Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Oxon: Routledge.
18. Lee, A. (2010) ‘When the article is the dissertation: Pedagogies for a PhD by publication’. In C. Aitchison, B. Kamler and A. Lee (eds), Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond (pp. 12-29). London and New York: Routledge.
19. Lee, A. and Green, B. (2009) ‘Supervision as metaphor’, Studies in Higher Education, 34 (6): 615-630.
20. Llewellyn, N. and Hindmarsh, J. (2010) ‘Preface’. In N. Llewellyn and J. Hindmarsh (eds), Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (pp. xi-xiv). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Lusted, D. (1986) ‘Why pedagogy?’, Screen, 27(5): 2-14.
22. Miller, C. (1984) ‘Genre as social action’, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-167.
23. Parry, O., Atkinson, P. and Delamont, S. (1997) ‘The structure of PhD research’, Sociology, 31(1): 121-129.