Exploring psychological responses to genetic testing for Lynch Syndrome within the family context

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1292-1299

  Eliezer, Dina ^a   Hadley, Donald W ^a   Koehly, Laura M ^a  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Depression; Family; Genetic testing; Lynch Snydrome; Oncology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EXTENDED FAMILY; FAMILY; FAMILY ATTITUDE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SCREENING; HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL CANCER; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMAN; IMMEDIATE FAMILY; MALE; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; PATIENT WORRY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ADOLESCENT; ANXIETY; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS, HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS; DEPRESSION; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC TESTING; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84918798755     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3551     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hadley DW, Ashida S, Jenkins JF, et al., Generation after generation: exploring the psychological impact of providing genetic services through a cascading approach. Genet Med 2010; 12: 808-815.
2. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA,. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health 2010; 31: 89-103.
3. Peterson SK,. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Educ Behav 2005; 32: 627-639.
4. Sorenson JR, Botkin JR,. Genetic testing and the family. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003; 119: 1-2.
5. Hamann HA, Smith TW, Smith KR, et al., Interpersonal responses among sibling dyads tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutations. Health Psychol 2008; 27: 100-109.
6. Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR,. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999; 8: 385-392.
7. Hampel H, Stephens JA, Pukkala E, et al., Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset. Gastroenterol 2005; 129: 415-421.
8. Jenkins MA, Baglietto L, Dowty JG, et al., Cancer risks for mismatch repair gene mutation carriers: a population-based early onset case-family study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 489-498.
9. Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Hadley DW, et al., Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome. JAMA 2006; 296: 1507-1517.
10. Järvinen HJ, Aarnio M, Mustonen H, et al., Controlled 15-year trial on screening for colorectal cancer in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol 2000; 118: 829-834.
11. Meiser B,. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005; 14: 1060-1074.
12. Broadstock M, Michie S, Marteau T,. Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet: EJHG 2000; 8: 731-738.
13. Lerman C, Croyle RT, Tercyak KP, Hamann H,. Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 784.
14. Marteau TM, Croyle RT,. The new genetics: psychological responses to genetic testing. Brit Med J 1998; 316: 693-696.
15. Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, et al., Psychologic distress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101: 395-403.
16. Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D,. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology 2008; 17: 746-755.
17. Ashida S, Hadley DW, Vaughn BK, Kuhn NR, Jenkins JF, Koehly LM,. The impact of familial environment on depression scores after genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Clin Genet 2009; 75: 43-49.
18. Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM,. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet 2001; 38: 519-526.
19. Aktan-Collan K, Kääriäinen H, Järvinen H, et al., Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study. Fam Cancer 2013; 12: 639-646.
20. Codori AM, Zawacki KL, Petersen GM, et al., Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet Part A 2003; 116: 117-128.
21. Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al., Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. Am J Med Genet 2001; 98: 15-24.
22. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT,. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol 2004; 55: 745-774.
23. Lyons RF, Mickelson KD, Sullivan MJ, Coyne JC,. Coping as a communal process. J Soc Pers Relat 1998; 15: 579-605.
24. Jemmott JB, Ditto PH, Croyle RT,. Judging health status: effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50 (5): 899-905.
25. Harwood J, Sparks L,. Social identity and health: an intergroup communication approach to cancer. Health Commun 2003; 15: 145-159.
26. Van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, et al., A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships. Psycho-Oncology 2007; 16 (4): 320-328.
27. Huggins M, Bloch M, Wiggins S, et al., Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. Am J Med Genet 1992; 42: 508-515.
28. Weil J,. Psychosocial Genetic Counseling. Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
29. Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Watts BG, Kempf KK, Vernon SW, Gritz ER,. A social network analysis of communication about hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genetic testing and family functioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003; 12: 304-313.
30. Peterson SK, Watts BG, Koehly LM, et al., How families communicate about HNPCC genetic testing: findings from a qualitative study. Am J Med Genet Part C 2003; 119: 78-86 Wiley Online Library.
31. Fowler JH, Christakis NA,. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2008; 337:a2338.
32. Valente TW,. Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Soc networks 1996; 18 (1): 69-89.
33. Burt RS,. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987; 92: 1287-1335.
34. Strang D, Soule SA,. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu Rev Sociol 1998; 24: 265-290.
35. Hadley DW, Jenkins J, Dimond E, et al., Genetic counseling and testing in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 573-582.
36. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W,. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979; 41: 209-218.
37. Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A,. Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12 (4): 843-850.
38. Radloff LS,. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1 (3): 385-401.
39. Aiken LS, West SG,. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, 1991.
40. Ersig AL, Hadley DW, Koehly LM,. Understanding patterns of health communication in families at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: Examining the effect of conclusive versus indeterminate genetic test results. Health Communication 2011; 26: 587-594.