Interpersonal Responses Among Sibling Dyads Tested for BRCA1/BRCA2 Gene Mutations

Health Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 100-109

  Hamann, Heidi A ^a   Smith, Timothy W ^b   Smith, Ken R ^b   Croyle, Robert T ^c   Ruiz, John M ^a   Kircher, John C ^b   Botkin, Jeffrey R ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

BRCA1 BRCA2; cancer; family; genetic testing; siblings

Indexed keywords

ANGER; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; ONCOGENE; PERCEPTION; SIBLING; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENES, BRCA2; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIBLINGS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 38949179219     PISSN: 02786133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.100     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Antoniou A., Pharoah P.D.P., Narod S., Risch H.A., Eyfjord J.E., Hopper J.L., et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 72 (2003) 1117-1130
2. Barlow S.H., and Bergin A.E. Religion and mental health from the Mormon perspective. In: Koenig H.G. (Ed). Handbook of religion and mental health (1998), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 225-243
3. Baty B.J., Venne V.L., McDonald J., Croyle R.T., Halls C., Nash J.E., et al. BRCA1 testing: Genetic counseling protocol development and counseling issues. Journal of Genetic Counseling 6 (1997) 223-244
4. Bennett, R. L. (n.d.). Testing for Huntington Disease: Making an informed choice. Retrieved November 3, 2006, from http://depts.washington.edu/neurogen/patient_info.html
5. Botkin J.R., Croyle R.T., Smith K.R., Baty B., Lerman C., Goldgar D.E., et al. A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychological effects of BRCA1 testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 88 (1996) 872-882
6. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 155-159
7. Costa Jr. P.T., and McCrae R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual (1992), Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL
8. Coyne J.C., and Anderson K.K. Marital status, marital satisfaction, and support processes among women at high risk for breast cancer. Journal of Family Psychology 13 (1999) 629-641
9. Cronbach L.J., and Furby L. How we should measure "change"-or should we?. Psychological Bulletin 74 (1970) 68-80
10. Croyle R.T., Smith K.R., Botkin J.R., Baty B., and Nash J. Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: Preliminary findings. Health Psychology 16 (1997) 63-72
11. Dawson M.E., Schell A.M., and Filion D.L. The electrodermal system. In: Cacioppo J.T., Tassinary L.G., and Berntson G.G. (Eds). Handbook of psychophysiology. 2nd ed. (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 200-223
12. Fowles D.C., Christie M.J., Edelberg R., Grings W.W., Lykken D.T., and Venables P.H. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 18 (1981) 232-239
13. Gayther S.A., Mangion J., Russell P., Seal S., Barfoot R., Ponder B., et al. Variations of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene. Nature Genetics 15 (1997) 103-105
14. Gillespie D.F., and Streeter C.L. Fitting regression models to research questions for analyzing change in nonexperimental research. Social Work Research 18 (1994) 239-244
15. Hayden M.R., Adam S., and Bloch M. Reply to Dr. Kessler (Letter to the Ed.). American Journal of Medical Genetics 45 (1993) 696-697
16. Huggins M., Bloch M., Wiggins S., Adam S., Suchowersky O., Trew M., et al. Predictive testing for Huntington disease in Canada: Adverse effects and unexpected results in those receiving a decreased risk. American Journal of Medical Genetics 42 (1992) 508-515
17. Hughes C., Lerman C., Schwartz M., Peshkin B.N., Wenzel L., Narod S., et al. All in the family: Evaluation of the process and content of sisters' communication about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results. American Journal of Medical Genetics 107 (2002) 143-150
18. Jennings J.R., Kamarck T., Stewart C., Eddy M., and Johnson P. Alternate cardiovascular baseline assessment techniques: Vanilla or resting baseline. Psychophysiology 24 (1992) 474-475
19. Kessler S. Reinventing the wheel (Letter to the Ed.). American Journal of Medical Genetics 45 (1993) 694-695
20. Kessler S., Field T., Worth L., and Mosbarger H. Attitudes of persons at risk for Huntington disease toward predictive testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics 26 (1987) 259-270
21. Kiesler D.J. The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review 90 (1983) 185-214
22. Kiesler D.J. Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy (1996), Wiley, New York, NY
23. Kiesler D.J., and Schmidt J.A. The Impact Message Inventory: Form IIA octant scoring version (1993), Mind Garden, Redwood City, CA
24. Lerman C., Narod S., Schulman K., Hughes C., Gomez-Caminero A., Bonney G., et al. BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer: A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association 275 (1996) 1885-1892
25. Llabre M.M., Spitzer S.B., Saab P.G., Ironson G., and Schneiderman N. The reliability and specificity of delta versus residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology 28 (1991) 701-711
26. Lodder L., Frets P.G., Trijsburg R.W., Meijers-Heijboer E.J., Klijn J.G.M., Duivenvoorden H.J., et al. Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. American Journal of Medical Genetics 98 (2001) 15-24
27. Manne S., Taylor K.L., Dougherty J., and Kemeny N. Supportive and negative responses in the partner relationship: Their association with psychological adjustment among individuals with cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 20 (1997) 101-125
28. McInerney-Leo A., Biesecker B.B., Hadley D.W., Kase R.G., Giambarresi T.R., Johnson E., et al. BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families II: Impact on relationships. American Journal of Medical Genetics 133A (2005) 165-169
29. Miki Y., Swenson J., Shattuck-Evans D., Futreal P.A., Harshman K., Tavtigian S., et al. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266 (1994) 66-71
30. Offit K. Clinical cancer genetics (1998), Wiley-Liss, New York, NY
31. Richards M. Annotation: Genetic research, family life, and clinical practice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39 (1998) 291-305
32. Schmidt J.A., Wagner C.C., and Kiesler D.J. Psychometric circumplex properties of the octant scale Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): A structural evaluation. Journal of Counseling Psychology 46 (1999) 325-334
33. Smith K.R., West J.A., Croyle R.T., and Botkin J.R. Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Moderating effect of siblings' test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 8 (1999) 385-392
34. Sorenson J.R., and Botkin J.R. Genetic testing and the family. American Journal of Medical Genetics 119C (2003) 1-2
35. Spielberger, C. D., Barker, L. R., Russell, S. F., Crane, R. S., Westberry, L. G., Knight, J., et al. (1979). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory. Unpublished manual. University of South Florida: Tampa.
36. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. SPSS for Windows, Release 10.1.0 [Computer Software] (2000), Author, Chicago
37. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd ed. (1996), Harper Collins, New York, NY
38. Thompson D., Easton D.F., and the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 94 (2002) 1358-1365
39. Tibben A., Vegter-van Vlis M., Skraastad M.I., Frets P.G., van der Kamp J.J.P., Niermeijer M.F., et al. DNA-testing for Huntington's disease in the Netherlands: A retrospective study on psychosocial effects. American Journal of Medical Genetics 44 (1992) 94-99
40. Trobst K.K. An interpersonal conceptualization and quantification of social support transactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (2000) 971-986
41. Wiggins J.S. A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 395-412
42. Wooster R., Bignell G., Lancaster J., Swift S., Seal S., Mangion J., et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378 (1995) 789-792
43. Wylie J.E., Smith K.R., and Botkin J.R. Effects of spouses on distress experienced by BRCA1 mutation carriers over time. American Journal of Medical Genetics 119C (2003) 35-44