Differential extraction of endogenous and exogenous 25-OH-vitamin D from serum makes the accurate quantification in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays challenging

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 151-160

  Lankes, Ulrich ^a   Elder, Peter A ^a   Lewis, John G ^a   George, Peter ^a  

^a CANTERBURY HEALTH LABORATORIES   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

25 OH vitamin D; automated immunoassays; extraction; mass spectrometry

Indexed keywords

CALCIFEDIOL; ERGOCALCIFEROL; HEXANE; METHANOL; 25 HYDROXYERGOCALCIFEROL; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMILUMINESCENCE IMMUNOASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESORPTION; DISSOCIATION; EXTRACTION; FREEZE THAWING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; BLOOD; CASE CONTROL STUDY; HEMOCHROMATOSIS; IMMUNOASSAY; LIQUID LIQUID EXTRACTION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D 2; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CALCIFEDIOL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; HEMOCHROMATOSIS; HEXANES; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION; METHANOL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLVENTS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84918782730     PISSN: 00045632     EISSN: 17581001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0004563214533316     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Westphal U. Steroid-protein interactions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986, pp.406–428.
2. Vogeser M.Quantification of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.J Steroid Biochem. 2010;121:565-573
3. Roth HJ,Schmidt-Gayk H,Weber H, et al.Accuracy and clinical implications of seven 25-OH-hydroxyvitamin D methods compared with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry as a reference.Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:153-159
4. Ong L,Saw S,Sahabdeen NB, et al.Current 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: Do they pass the test?.Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1127-1134
5. Janssen MJW,Wielders JPM,Bekker CC, et al.Multicenter comparison study of current methods to measure 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum.Steroids. 2012;77:1366-1372
6. Cluse ZN,Fudge AN,Whiting MJ, et al.Evaluation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay on the immunodiagnostic system iSYS analyser.Ann Clin Biochem. 2012;49:159-165
7. Lai JKC, Lucas RM, Banks E, et al. Variability in vitamin D assays impairs clinical assessment of vitamin D status. Intern Med J 2012; 42: 43–50.
8. Carter G and Jones J. DEQAS review 2012. www.deqas.org.
9. Yates AM,Bowron A,Calton L, et al.Interlaboratory variation in 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 is significantly improved if common calibration material is used.Clin Chem. 2008;54:2082-2084
10. Owen LJ,MacDonald PR,Keevil BG.Is calibration the cause of variation in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry testosterone measurement?.Ann Clin Biochem. 2013;50:368-370
11. Couchman L,Benton CM,Moniz CF.Variability in the analysis of 25-hydroxyvitamin D by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: The devil is in the detail.Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413:1239-1243
12. Stepman HCM,Vanderroost A,Van Uytfanghe K, et al.Candidate reference measurement procedures for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 by using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Clin Chem. 2011;57:441-448
13. Tai SS-C,Bedner M,Phinney KW.Development of a candidate reference measurement procedure for the determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 in human serum using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.Anal Chem. 2010;82:1942-1948
14. Carter GD.Accuracy of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: Confronting the issues.Curr Drug Targets. 2011;125:19-28
15. Heijboer AC,Blankenstein MA,Kema IP, et al.Accuracy of 6 routine 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: Influence of vitamin D binding protein concentration.Clin Chem. 2012;58:543-548
16. Maunsell Z,Wright DJ,Rainbow SJ.Routine isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for simultaneous measurement of 25-hydroxy metabolites of vitamins D2 and D3.Clin Chem. 2005;51:1683-1693
17. Elder PA,Lewis JG,King RI, et al.An anomalous result from gel tubes for vitamin D.Clin Chim Acta. 2009;410:95-95
18. Ding S,Schoenmaker I,Jones K, et al.Quantitative determination of vitamin D metabolites in plasma using UHPLC-MS/MS.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:779-789
19. Carter GD.25-hydroxyvitamin D: A difficult analyte.Clin Chem. 2012;58:486-488
20. Farrell C,Soldo J,Williams P, et al.25-hydroxyvitamin D testing: Challenging the performance of current automated immunoassays.Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012;50:1953-1963
21. Moon H-W,Cho J-H,Hur M, et al.Comparison of four current 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays.Clin Biochem. 2012;45:326-330
22. Farrell C-JL,Martin S,McWhinney B, et al.State-of-the-art vitamin D assays: A comparison of automated immunoassays with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods.Clin Chem. 2012;58:531-542
23. de Koning L,Al-Turkmani M,NBerg AH, et al.Variation in clinical vitamin D status by DiaSorin Liaison and LC-MS/MS in the presence of elevated 25-OH-vitamin D2.Clin Chim Acta. 2013;415:54-58
24. Becker N,McClellan AC,Gronowski AM, et al.Inaccurate 25-hydroxyvitamin D results from a common immunoassay.Clin Chem. 2012;58:948-950
25. Bianchi S,Maffei S,Prontera C, et al.Preanalytical, analytical (DiaSorin LIAISON) and clinical variables potentially affecting the 25-OH-vitamin D estimation.Clin Biochem. 2012;45:1652-1657
26. Lewis JG,Elder PA.Serum 25-OH-vitamin D2 and D3 are stable under exaggerated conditions.Clin Chem. 2008;54:1931-1932