What modifies the expression of personality tendencies? defining basic domains of situation variables

Journal of Personality

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 479-504

  Saucier, Gerard ^a   Bel Bahar, Tarik ^a   Fernandez, Cynthia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROL; EGO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEARNING; MALE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF CONCEPT; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENTS;

EID: 34247854909     PISSN: 00223506     EISSN: 14676494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00446.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bem, D. Funder, D. C. (1978). Predicting more of the people more of the time: Assessing the personality of situations. Psychological Review, 85, 485 501.
2. Block, J. Block, J. (1981). Studying situational dimensions: A grand perspective and some limited empiricism. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective (pp. 85 106). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
3. Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307 336.
4. Buss, D. M. Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105 126.
5. Cantor, N., Mischel, W. Schwartz, J. (1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45 77.
6. Carver, C. S. Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19 35.
7. Endler, N. S. (1993). Personality: An interactional perspective. In P. J. Hettema I. J. Deary (Eds.), Foundations of personality (pp. 251 268). Dordrecht, Netherlands : Kluwer.
8. Endler, N. S. Magnusson, D. (1976). Interactional psychology and personality. Washington, DC : Hemisphere.
9. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors, 37, 32 64.
10. Forgas, J. P. Van Heck, G. L. (1992). The psychology of situations. In G. V. Caprara G. L. Van Heck (Eds.), Modern personality psychology: Critical reviews and new directions (pp. 418 455). New York : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
11. Frederiksen, N. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations. American Psychologist, 27, 114 123.
12. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197 221.
13. Funder, D. C. Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773 794.
14. Furnham, A. Argyle, M. (1981). The psychology of social situations: Selected readings. Oxford, UK : Pergamon Press.
15. Hogan, R., Harkness, A. R. Lubinski, D. (2000). Personality and individual differences. In K. K. Pawlik M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), International handbook of psychology (pp. 283 304). London : Sage.
16. Ickes, W. A., Snyder, M. Garcia, S. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations. In J. A. Johnson R. Hogan (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165 195). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
17. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66 100). New York : Guilford.
18. Johnson, J. A. (1999). Old wine in new bottles. European Journal of Personality, 13, 443 453.
19. Kantor, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology (Vol. 1.). Bloomington, IL : Principia.
20. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York : Harcourt.
21. Lehmann, C. (1994). Predicates: Aspectual types. In R. E. Asher (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 3297 3302). Oxford, UK : Pergamon.
22. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York : McGraw-Hill.
23. Magnusson, D. (1971). An analysis of situational dimensions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 32, 851 867.
24. Magnusson, D. (1981). Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
25. Magnusson, D. Ekehammer, B. (1976). Perceptions of and reactions to stressful situations. In N. S. Endler D. Magnusson (Eds.), Interactional psychology and personality (pp. 547 559). Washington, DC : Hemisphere.
26. Mischel, W. Shoda, Y. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The Cognitive Affective Personality System (CAPS). In L. A. Pervin O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 197 218). New York : Guilford.
27. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York : Oxford University Press.
28. Nisbett, R. E. Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231 259.
29. Pervin, L. A. (1978). Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments. Human Ecology, 6, 71 105.
30. Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295 328.
31. Saucier, G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296 1312.
32. Sells, S. B. (1963). An interactionist looks at the environment. American Psychologist, 18, 696 702.
33. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W. Wright, J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 674 687.
34. Snyder, M. (1983). The influence of individuals on situations: Implications for understanding the links between personality and social behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 497 516.
35. ten Berge, M. A. De Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective: A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337 360.
36. ten Berge, M. A. De Raad, B. (2001). The construction of a joint taxonomy of traits and situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 253 276.
37. ten Berge, M. A. De Raad, B. (2002). The structure of situations from a personality perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 81 102.
38. Van Heck, G. L. (1984). The construction of a general taxonomy of situations. In H. Bonarius, G. Van Heck N. Smid (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Theoretical and empirical developments (pp. 149 164). Lisse, Netherlands : Swets & Zeitlinger.
39. Van Heck, G. L. (1989). Situation concepts: Definitions and classifications. In P. J. Hettema (Ed.), Personality and environment: Assessment of human adaptation (pp. 53 69). Oxford, England : John Wiley.
40. Van Heck, G. L., Perugini, M., Caprara, G. V. Froeger, J. (1994). The Big Five as tendencies in situations. Personality & Individual Differences, 16, 715 731.
41. Van Mechelen, I. De Raad, B. (1999). Editorial: Personality and situations. European Journal of Personality, 13, 333 336.
42. Wright, J. C. Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159 1177.
43. Zwaan, R. A. Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162 185.