Women for a change: Closing the leadership gap

Academic Psychiatry

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 731-736

  Soklaridis, Sophie ^a,b   López, Jenna ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; FEMINISM; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHIATRY;

FEMINISM; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; PSYCHIATRY; WOMEN;

EID: 84918771020     PISSN: 10429670     EISSN: 15457230     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40596-014-0215-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Shugart HA, Egley Waggoner C, O'Brien Hallstein DL. Mediating third-wave feminism: Appropriation as postmodern media practice. Crit Stud Media Comm. 2001;18:194-210.
2. Vavrus MD. Postfeminist news: Political women in media culture. New York: SUNY Press; 2002.
3. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, et al. Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2007.
4. McRobbie A. The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. London: Sage; 2008.
5. Hausmann R, Tyson LD, Zahidi S. The global gender gap report 2012. World Economic Forum. 2012. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF-GenderGap-Report-2012.pdf
6. Council of Canadian Academies. Strengthening Canada's research capacity: the gender dimension. The Expert Panel on Women in University Research. Council of Canadian Academies. 2012. Retrieved from www.scienceadvice.ca/en/assessments/completed/women-researchers.aspx
7. Morley L. Hidden transcripts: the micropolitics of gender in Commonwealth universities. Women Stud Int Forum. 2006;29:543-51.
8. van den Brink M, Benschop Y, Jansen W. Transparency in academic recruitment: a problematic tool for gender equality? Organ Stud. 2010;31(11):1459-83.
9. Sweigart A. Women on board for change: the Norway model of boardroom quotas as a tool for progress in the United States and Canada. NJILB. 2012;32(4):81A-105.
10. Byrne D, Neuman JH. The implications of attraction research for organizational issues. In: Kelley K, editor. Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992. p. 29-70.
11. Kanter RM. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books; 1977.
12. Kanter RM. Some effects of group proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. Am J Sociol. 1977;82:965-90.
13. Fotaki M. No woman is like a man (in academia): the masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body. Organ Stud. 2013;34(9):1251-75.
14. Morley L. Organising feminisms: the micro-politics of the academy. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1999.
15. Seymour E, Hewitt NM. Talking about leaving: why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder: Westview Press; 1997.
16. Powell GN. The gender and leadership wars. Organ Dyn. 2011;40:1-9.
17. Powell GN, Butterfield DA, Parent JD. Gender and managerial stereotypes: have the times changed? J Manag Dev. 2002;28:177-93.
18. Agars MD, Kottke JL. Models and practice of diversity management: a historical review and presentation of a new integration theory. In: Stockdale M, Crosby F, editors. The psychology and management of workplace diversity. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. p. 55-77.
19. Kottke JL, Agars MD. Understanding the processes that facilitate and hinder efforts to advance women in organizations. Career Dev Int. 2005;10:190-202.
20. Sandler B. The chilly climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators and graduate students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges; 1986.
21. Morantz-Sanchez RM. Sympathy and science: women physicians in American medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985.
22. More, ES. Restoring the balance: women physicians and the profession of medicine, 1850-1995. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2009.
23. Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations. Data check: women still underrepresented in Canadian universities. Ontario Confederation of University Faculty Associations. 2012. Retrieved from http://ocufa.on.ca/2012/data-check-women-still-underrepresented-in-canadian-universities/#sthash.uanpGtST.dpuf
24. Joliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, et al. Women in U.S. academic medicine and science: Statistics and benchmarking report, 2011-2012. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2012.
25. Department of Justice Canada. Employment Equity Act. 1995. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/E-5.401.pdf
26. Department of Justice Canada. Canadian Human Rights Act. 1985. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/H-6.pdf
27. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. 1981. Retrieved from www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw.htm
28. Timmers T, Willemsen T, Tijdens K. Gender diversity policies in universities: a multi perspective framework of policy measures. High Educ. 2010;59(6):719-35.
29. Diaz-Garcia C, Gonzalez-Moreno A, Saez-Martinez J. Gender diversity within R&D teams: its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innov-Manag Policy Pract. 2013;15(2):149-60.
30. Ostergaard CR, Timmermans B, Kristinsson K. Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Res Policy. 2011;40:500-9.
31. Fryer RG, Loury GC. Affirmative action and its mythology. J Econ Perspect. 2005;19:147-62.
32. Fryer RG, Loury GC, Yuret T. An economic analysis of color-blind affirmative action. J Law Econ Organ. 2008;24:319-55.
33. Catalyst. Women in U.S. management and labor force. 2013. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-us-management-and-labor-force
34. Catalyst. Catalyst 2013 census of Fortune 500: still no progress after years of no progress. 2013. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/media/catalyst-2013-census-fortune-500-still-no-progress-after-years-no-progress
35. van den Brink M, Benschop Y. Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization. 2012;19:507-24.
36. Gatrell C. Managing the maternal body: a comprehensive review and transdisciplinary analysis. Int J Manag Rev. 2011;13:97-112.
37. Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Acad Manag Rev. 1993;18(1):56-87.
38. Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass D. At the margins: a distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Acad Manag J. 1998;41(4):441-52.
39. South SJ, Bonjean C, Markham W, et al. Social structure and group interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. Am Sociol Rev. 1982;24:367-80.
40. DeFrancisci LL, Wood WC, Petkova E, et al. Mentoring in psychiatric residency programs: a survey of chief residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(4):307-12.
41. Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students: a review of the PubMed literature, 2000-2008. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(32). doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-32.
42. Sambunjak D, Straus SE. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103-15.
43. Wise MR, Shapiro H, Bodley J, et al. Factors affecting academic promotion in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(2):127-36.
44. Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson BF, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the American Association of Medical Colleges Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1043-61.
45. Bickel J. Women in academic psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28(4):285-91.
46. Yedidia MJ, Bickel J. Why aren't there more women leaders in academic medicine? The views of clinical department chairs. Acad Med. 2001;76(5):453-65.
47. Mor Barak M, Cherin D, Berkman S. Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. J Appl Behav Sci. 1998;34(1):82-104.