A Family of Generalized Diagnostic Classification Models for Multiple Choice Option-Based Scoring

Applied Psychological Measurement

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 62-79

  DiBello, Louis V ^a   Henson, Robert A ^b   Stout, William F ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic testing; Latent class models; Psychometric theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84918558685     PISSN: 01466216     EISSN: 15523497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146621614561315     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Achieve. (n.d.). Next generation science standards. Available from www.nextgenscience.org
2. Bradshaw L.,Templin L.Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: A psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.Psychometrika. 2014;79:403-425
3. Briggs D. C.,Alonzo A. C.,Schwab C.,Wilson M.Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items.Educational Assessment. 2006;11:33-63
4. de la Torre J.A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively-based multiple choice options.Applied Psychological Measurement. 2009;33:163-183
5. DiBello L. V.,Henson R. A.,Stout W. F..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society; 2014aMadison, WI; 2014a.
6. DiBello L. V.,Henson R. A.,Stout W. F..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education; 2014bPhiladelphia, PA; 2014b.
7. DiBello L. V.,Henson R. A.,Stout W. F.,Roussos L. A.J. Masters.Psychometric model for diagnostic classification for multiple-choice option-based scoring: Application to a diagnostic classroom assessment instrument.Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association; 2014Philadelphia, PA; 2014.
8. DiBello L. V.,Roussos L.,Stout W.Handbook of statistics 26. Rao C. R.Sinharay S., ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007:979-1030.
9. DiBello L. V.,Stout W.,Roussos L.Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Nichols P.Chipman S.Brennan R., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995:361-390.
10. Gelman A.,Carlin J. B.,Stern H. S.,Rubin D. B.Bayesian data analysis. 2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). London, England: Chapman & Hall.London, England: Chapman & Hall; 2004:
11. Haertel E. H.Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items.Journal of Educational Measurement. 1989;26:301-321
12. Hartz S. M.A Bayesian framework for the Unified Model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign; 2001:
13. Henson R. A.,Templin J..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society Meeting, Montreal; 2006Quebec, Canada; 2006.
14. Henson R. A.,Templin J. L.,Willse J. T.Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables.Psychometrika. 2009;74:191-210
15. Junker B.,Sijtsma K.Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory.Applied Psychological Measurement. 2001;25:258-272
16. Leighton J. P.,Gierl M. J.Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007:
17. Masters J..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2012Vancouver, BC; 2012.
18. Masters J..The diagnostic geometry assessment system: Results from a randomized controlled trial; 2014Philadelphia, PA; 2014.
19. Masters J.,Chapman L..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2011New Orleans, LA; 2011.
20. Miller R. L.,Streveler R.,Olds B.,Chi M.,Nelson M.,Geist M..Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (electronic); 2006Chicago, IL; 2006.
21. Minstrell J.Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Duit R.Goldberg F.Niedderer H., ed. Kiel, Germany: IPN; 1992:110-128.
22. Minstrell J.Designing for science: Implications for professional, instructional, and everyday science. Crowley K.Schunn C. D.Okada T., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:369-394.
23. Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors; 2010:
24. Next Generation Science Standards. (n.d.). Available from http://www.nextgenscience.org/
25. Pellegrino J. W.,DiBello L. V.,James K.,Jorion N.,Schroeder L..Proceedings of Research in Engineering Education Symposium; 2011Madrid, Spain; 2011.
26. Pellegrino J. W.,DiBello L. V.,Miller R. L.,Streveler R. A.,Schroeder L.,Stout W. F.J. W. Pellegrino.Conceptual underpinnings of concept inventories.Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association; 2013San Francisco, CA; 2013.
27. Roussos L. A.,DiBello L. V.,Stout W. F.,Hartz S. M.,Henson R. A.,Templin J. H.Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications. Leighton J.Gierl M., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007:275-318.
28. Rupp A. A.,Templin J.,Henson R. A.Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2010:
29. Steif P. S.,Dantzler J. A.A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometric analysis.Journal of Engineering Education. 2005;94:363-371
30. TemplinJ. (2004). Generalized linear mixed proficiency models for cognitive diagnosis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
31. von Davier M.A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2008;61:287-307