Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables

Psychometrika

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 191-210

  Henson, Robert A ^a   Templin, Jonathan L ^b   Willse, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive diagnosis models; Latent class models; Log linear latent class models

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349150499     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-008-9089-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. H. Akaike 1974 A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 6 716 723
3. J. de la Torre J.A. Douglas 2004 Higher order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis Psychometrika 69 333 353 (Pubitemid 40131582)
4. DiBello, L., Stout, W., & Roussos, L. (2007). Cognitive diagnosis Part I. In C.R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics : Vol. 26. Psychometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Embretson, S. (1985). Studying intelligence with test theory models. In Current topics in human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 98-140).
6. Fischer, G., & Forman, A. (1982). Some Applications of Logistic Latent Trait Models with Linear Constraints on the Parameters. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 397-416.
7. Fu, J. (2005). A polytomous extension of the fusion model and its Bayesian parameter estimation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
8. Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., & Rubin, D. (1995). Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
9. A. Gelman X. Meng H. Stern 1996 Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies Statistica Sinica 6 733 807 (Pubitemid 126706389)
10. S.J. Haberman 1974 Loglinear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation: Maximum likelihood equations Annals of Statistics 2 911 924
11. Haberman, S.J. (1979). Qualitative data analysis: Vol. 2. New developments. New York: Academic Press.
12. E.H. Haertel 1989 Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items Journal of Educational Measurement 26 333 352
13. Hagenaars, J. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
14. Hartz, S. (2002) A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
15. Jang, E. (2005) A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning in the context of NG TOEFL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
16. R. Janssen P. DeBoeck 1997 Psychometric modeling of componentially designed synonym tasks Applied Psychological Measurement 21 37 50 (Pubitemid 127045377)
17. B.W. Junker K. Sijtsma 2001 Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory Applied Psychological Measurement 25 258 272 (Pubitemid 33317121)
18. S. Lynch B. Western 2004 Bayesian posterior predictive checks for complex models Sociological Methods and Research 32 302 335 (Pubitemid 38191967)
19. G.B. Macready C.M. Dayton 1977 The use of probabilistic models in the assessment of mastery Journal of Education Statistics 33 379 416
20. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2006). Mplus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
21. D. Rindskopf 1983 Ageneral framework for using latent class analysis to test hierarchical and non hierarchical learning models Psychometrika 48 85 97
22. G. Schwarz 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model Annals of Statistics 6 2 461 464
23. Tatsuoka, K.K. (1990). Toward an integration of item-response theory and cognitive error diagnosis. In N. Frederiksen, R. Glaser, A. Lesgold, & M. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
24. Templin, J. (2004). Generalized linear mixed proficiency models for cognitive diagnosis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
25. J. Templin R. Henson 2006 Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models Psychological Methods 11 3 287 305
26. Templin, J., Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2006). General theory and estimation of cognitive diagnosis models: Using Mplus to derive model estimates. 2007 National Council on Measurement in Education training session, Chicago, Illinois.
27. Templin, J., Henson, R., & Douglas, J. (2008). General theory and estimation of cognitive diagnosis models as constrained latent class models. Manuscript under review.
28. Templin, J., Henson, R., Templin, S., & Roussos, L. (in press). Robustness of hierarchical modeling of attribute correlation in cognitive diagnosis models. Applied Psychological Measurement.
29. Vermunt, J.K., & Magidson, J.
30. von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data (ETS Research Report RR-05-16).