A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 287-307

  Von Davier, Matthias ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE TESTS; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 56649100517     PISSN: 00071102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000711007X193957     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Almond, R. G., & Mislevy, R. J. (1999). Graphical models and computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 23, 223-237.
2. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
4. de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, (59(3), 333-353.
5. Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.
6. Haberman, S. J. (1979). Qualitative data analysis: New developments (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
7. Haertel, E. H. (1989). Using restricted latent class models to map the skill structure of achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(4}, 301-321.
8. Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Hartz, S., Roussos, L., & Stout, W (2002). Skills diagnosis: Theory and practice. User Manual for Arpeggio software. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
10. Kelderman, H., & Macready, G. B. (1990). The use of loglinear models for assessing differential item functioning across manifest and latent examinee groups. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 307-327.
11. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
12. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13. Maris, E. (1999). Estimating multiple classification latent class models. Psychometrika, 64(2), 187-212.
14. Mislevy, R. J., & Verhelst, N. D. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55(2), 195-215.
15. Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159-176.
16. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Reckase, M. D. (1997). The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 25-36.
18. Rost.J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271-282.
19. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
20. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 345-354.
21. von Davier, M. (2001). WINMIRA 2001: A software for estimating Rasch models, mixed and HYBRID Rasch models, and the latent class analysis [Computer software]. Retrieved September 2, 2008, from: http://assess.com/xcort/product. php?productid=269&cat=O&page=1.
22. von Davier, M., & Rost, J. (1995). Polytomous mixed Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models - foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 371-379). New York: Springer.
23. von Davier, M., & Rost, J. (2007). Mixture distribution item response models. In C. R. Rao & S. Simharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Psychometrics (Vol. 26, pp. 643-661). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2004a, October). A class of models for cognitive diagnosis. Paper presented at the 4th Spearman Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
25. von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2004b, December). A class of models for cognitive diagnosis - and some notes on estimation. Paper presented at the ETS Tucker Workshop Seminar, Princeton, NJ.
26. von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2004c). Partially observed mixtures of IRT models: An extension of the generalized partial credit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 389-406.
27. von Davier, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2007). Mixture distribution Rasch models and Hybrid Rasch models. In M. von Davier & C. H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 99-115). New York: Springer.
28. Wilson, M. R. (1989). Saltus: A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 276-289.
29. Xu, X., & von Davier, M. (2006). Cognitive Diagnosis for NAEP Proficiency Data. ETS Research Repot RR-06-08. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.
30. Yamamoto, K.Y (1989). HYBRID model of IRT and latent class models. ETS Research Report RR-89-41. Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NJ.