Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 49, 2014, Pages 17678-17683

  Banakou, Domna ^a,b   Slater, Mel ^a,b,c,d  

^a Dept of Personality   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agency; Body ownership illusion; Illusory speaking; Rubber hand illusion; Vibrotactile stimulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; BODY REGIONS; DOUBLE DISSOCIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; TACTILE STIMULATION; VIBRATION; VOCALIZATION; VOICE; ADULT; BODY IMAGE; BRAIN; CARTILAGE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HAND; MALE; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; THYROID GLAND; VISION;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; BRAIN; CARTILAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SPEECH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; THYROID GLAND; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIBRATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOICE;

EID: 84917705994     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414936111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (6669): 756-756.
2. Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proc Biol Sci 270 (1523):1499-1506.
3. Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2008) If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS ONE 3(12):e3832.
4. Guterstam A, Ehrsson HH (2012) Disowning one's seen real body during an out-of-body illusion. Conscious Cogn 21(2):1037-1042.
5. Slater M, Spanlang B, Sanchez-Vives MV, Blanke O (2010) First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 5(5):e10564-e10564.
6. Maselli A, Slater M (2013) The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Front Hum Neurosci 7:83.
7. Llobera J, Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2013) The relationship between virtual body ownership and temperature sensitivity. J R Soc Interface 10(85):20130300.
8. Moseley GL, et al. (2008) Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(35):13169-13173.
9. Barnsley N, et al. (2011) The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm. Curr Biol 21(23):R945-R946.
10. Maister L, Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Tsakiris M (2013) Experiencing ownership over a dark-skinned body reduces implicit racial bias. Cognition 128(2):170-178.
11. Peck TC, Seinfeld S, Aglioti SM, Slater M (2013) Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious Cogn 22(3):779-787.
12. van der Hoort B, Guterstam A, Ehrsson HH (2011) Being Barbie: The size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world. PLoS ONE 6(5):e20195.
13. Banakou D, Groten R, Slater M (2013) Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(31):12846-12851.
14. Blakemore S-J, Frith C (2003) Self-awareness and action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13(2): 219-224.
15. Wegner DM (2002) The illusion of conscious will (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
16. Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J (2002) Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nat Neurosci 5(4):382-385.
17. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 6(6):237-242.
18. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2(9):661-670.
19. Zheng ZZ, Macdonald EN, Munhall KG, Johnsrude IS (2011) Perceiving a stranger's voice as being one's own: A 'rubber voice' illusion? PLoS ONE 6(4):e18655.
20. Burnett TA, Freedland MB, Larson CR, Hain TC (1998) Voice F0 responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J Acoust Soc Am 103(6):3153-3161.
21. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH (2012) Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A Dissociation of wwnership and agency. Front Hum Neurosci 6:40.
22. Sanchez-Vives MV, Spanlang B, Frisoli A, Bergamasco M, Slater M (2010) Virtual hand illusion induced by visuomotor correlations. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10381.
23. Kokkinara E, Slater M (2014) Measuring the effects through time of the influence of visuomotor and visuotactile synchronous stimulation on a virtual body ownership illusion. Perception 43(1):43-58.
24. Gallagher S (2012) Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas Psychol 30(1): 15-31.
25. Gallagher I (2000) Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci 4(1):14-21.
26. Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107(3):978-998.
27. Sato A, Yasuda A (2005) Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition 94(3):241-255.
28. Tsakiris M, Schütz-Bosbach S, Gallagher S (2007) On agency and body-ownership: Phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious Cogn 16(3):645-660.
29. Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn 15(2):423-432.
30. Skipper JI, Nusbaum HC, Small SL (2005) Listening to talking faces: Motor cortical activation during speech perception. Neuroimage 25(1):76-89.
31. Wegner DM, Wheatley T (1999) Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. Am Psychol 54(7):480-492.
32. Wegner DM, Sparrow B, Winerman L (2004) Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. J Pers Soc Psychol 86(6):838-848.
33. Banissy MJ, Ward J (2013) Mechanisms of self-other representations and vicarious experiences of touch in mirror-touch synesthesia. Front Hum Neurosci 7(112):112.
34. Maister L, Banissy MJ, Tsakiris M (2013) Mirror-touch synaesthesia changes representations of self-identity. Neuropsychologia 51(5):802-808.
35. Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893-910.
36. van Ulzen NR, Fiorio M, Cesari P (2013) Motor resonance evoked by observation of subtle nonverbal behavior. Soc Neurosci 8(4):347-355.
37. Hogeveen J, Obhi SS (2012) Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. J Neurosci 32:5984-5989.
38. Larson CR, Burnett TA, Kiran S, Hain TC (2000) Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses. J Acoust Soc Am 107(1):559-564.
39. Jones JA, Munhall KG (2000) Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. J Acoust Soc Am 108(3 Pt 1):1246-1251.
40. Cohen O, et al. (2012) fMRI Robotic Embodiment: A Pilot Study. The Fourth IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biometical Robotics and Biomechatronics (IEEE, Washington, DC), pp 314-319.
41. Grechkin TY, Nguyen TD, Plumert JM, Cremer JF, Kearney JK (2010) How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Trans Appl Percept 7(4):Article 26.