Nonverbal communication, gesture, and second language classrooms: A review

Gesture: Second Language Acquistion and Classroom Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 25-44

  Quinlisk, Carla Chamberlin ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917320297     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203866993     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Allen, A. (1995). The effects of emblematic gestures on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. Modern Language Journal, 79, 521-529.
2. Allen, L. (2000). Nonverbal accommodations in foreign language teacher talk. Applied Language Learning, 11, 155-176.
3. Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (ed.), Communication Yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4. Andersen, P.A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (eds.), Multichannel Integrations of Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Andersen, P.A. (1991). When one cannot not communicate: A challenge to Motley's traditional communication postulates. Communication Studies, 42, 309-325.
6. Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7. Burgoon, J. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. Knapp & G.R. Miller (eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 229-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Burgoon, J. & Guerrero, L. (1994). Nonverbal communication. In M. Burgoon, F. Hunsaker & E. Dawson (eds.), Human Communication (pp. 122-171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Burgoon, J. & Hale, J. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
10. Burgoon, J., Buller, D., & Woodall, G.W. (1989). Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Burroughs, N. (1990). The relationship of teacher immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning (dissertation, West Virginia University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51. Canagarajah, S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601-677.
12. Chamberlin, C.R. (2000). Pre-service ESL teachers' perceptions of trust in supervisors. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 353-363.
13. Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
14. Chuang, R. (2003). A postmodern critique of cross-cultural and intercultural communication research: Contesting essentialism, positivist dualism, and Eurocentricity. In W. Starosta & G. Chen (eds.), Ferment in the Intercultural Field: Axiology/Value/Praxis (pp. 24-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Collier, M.J. & Powell, R. (1986, May). The effect of student culture/ethnicity on judgments of instructional communication. Presented at the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
16. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J.W. (1995). Food for thought; Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
17. Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
18. Exline, R. & Fehr, B. (1978). Applications of semiosis to the study of visual interaction. In A. Siegman & S. Feldstein (eds.), Nonverbal Behavior and Communication (pp. 117-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Fayer, J., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. (1988). Teacher immediacy and student learning: A comparison between U.S. mainland and Puerto Rican classrooms. In J. Fayer (ed.), Puerto Rican Communication Studies (pp. 111-126). Caracas: Icanografica.
20. French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartright (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
21. Frymier, A. & Thompson, C.A. (1992). Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education, 41, 388-399.
22. Frymier, A.B. & Houser, M. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207-219.
23. Golish, T. (1999). Students' use of compliance gaining strategies with graduate teaching assistants: Examining the other end of the power spectrum. Communication Quarterly, 47, 12-32.
24. Golish, T.D. & Olson, L.N. (2000). Students' use of power in the classroom: An investigation of student power, teacher power, and teacher immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 48, 293-310.
25. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
26. Gorham, J. & Zakahi, W.R. (1990). A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39, 354-368.
27. Gudykunst, W.B. (2002). Issues in cross-cultural communication research. In W.B. Gudykunst & B. Moody (eds.), Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication (pp. 165-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Harper, R.G. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: An overview. In S. Ellyson & J. Dovidio (eds.), Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 29-48). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Houser, M.L. (2006). Expectancy violations of instructor communication as predictors of motivation and learning: A comparison of traditional and nontraditional students. Communication Quarterly, 54, 331-349.
30. Johnson, S.D. & Miller, A.N. (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education, 51, 280-292.
31. Kellerman, S. (1992). "I see what you mean": The role of kinesic behavior in listening and implications for foreign and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 13, 239-258.
32. Kelley, D. & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
33. Knapp, M.L. & Hall, J.A. (1992). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction (3rd edn.). Ft. Worth, TX: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
34. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79-117.
36. Lu, S. (1997). Culture and compliance gaining in the classroom: A preliminary investigation of Chinese college teachers' use of behavior alteration techniques. Communication Education, 46, 10-28.
37. McCafferty, S.G. (1998). Nonverbal expression and L2 private speech. Applied Linguistics, 19, 73-96.
38. McCafferty, S.G. (2002). Gesture and creating zones of proximal development for second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 86, 192-203.
39. McCroskey, J., Richmond, V., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J., & Barraclough, R. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281-291.
40. McCroskey, J., Fayer, J., Richmond, V., Sallinen, A., & Barraclough, R. (1996a). A multi-cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44, 297-307.
41. McCroskey, J., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J., Richmond, V., & Barraclough, R. (1996b). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.
42. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350-371.
43. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44. McNeill, D. (2000). (ed.) Language and Gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from nonimmediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 294-295.
47. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1, 213-217.
48. Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent Messages (2nd edn.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
49. Motley, M.T. (1990). On whether one can(not) communicate: An examination via traditional communication postulates. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 1-20.
50. Motley, M.T. & Camden, C.T. (1988). Facial expression of emotion: A comparison of posed expressions versus spontaneous expressions in an interpersonal setting. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 1-22.
51. Neu, J. (1990). Assessing the role of nonverbal communication in the acquisition of communicative competence in L2. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen & S. Krashen (eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language (pp. 121-138). New York: Newbury House.
52. Neuliep, J. (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44, 267-277.
53. Neuliep, J.W. (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research, 24, 431-451.
54. Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307-322.
55. Patterson, M.L. (1978). The role of space in social interaction. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (eds.), Nonverbal Communication and Behavior (pp. 265-290). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Pennycook, A. (1985). Actions speak louder than words: Paralanguage, communication, and education. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 259-282.
57. Powell, R. & Harville, B. (1990). The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39, 369-379.
58. Ricci Bitti, P. & Poggi, I. (1991). Symbolic nonverbal behavior: Talking through gestures. In R.S. Feldman & B. Rime (eds.), Fundamentals of Nonverbal Behavior (pp. 433-457). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Richmond, V.P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.
60. Richmond, V. & McCroskey, J. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125-136.
61. Richmond, V. & Roach, K.D. (1992). Power in the classroom: Seminal studies. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey (eds.), Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern (pp. 47-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Richmond, V., Davis, L., Saylor, K., & McCroskey, J. (1984). Power strategies in organizations: Communication techniques and messages. Human Communication Research, 11, 85-108.
63. Richmond, V., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
64. Roach, K.D. & Byrne, P.R. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 1-14.
65. Roach, K.D., Cornett-DeVito, M.M., & DeVito, R. (2005). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and French classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53, 87-107.
66. Sanders, J. & Wiseman, R. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.
67. Schwartz, B., Tesser, A., & Powell, E. (1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 114-120.
68. Spiegel, J. & Machotka, P. (1974). Messages of the Body. New York: The Free Press.
69. Thweatt, K.S. & McCroskey, J. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47, 348-358.
70. von Raffler-Engel, W. (1980). Kinesics and paralinguistics: A neglected factor on second language research. Canadian Modern Language Review, 36, 225-237.
71. Wylie, L. (1985). Language learning and communication. The French Review, 58, 777-785.
72. Zhang, Q. (2005a). Immediacy, humor, power distance and classroom communication apprehension in Chinese college classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53, 109-124.
73. Zhang, Q. (2005b). Teacher immediacy and classroom communication apprehension: A crosscultural investigation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 34, 50-64.
74. Zhang, Q. & Oetzel, J.G. (2006). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: A Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55, 313-330.
75. Zhang, Q. & Zhang, J. (2006). Dimensions of teacher immediacy as predictors of student learning: A Chinese perspective. Communication Research Reports, 23, 199-207.