How does an object become symbolic?: Rooting semiotic artifacts in dynamic shared experiences

Symbolic Transformation: The Mind in Movement Through Culture and Society

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 173-192

  Zittoun, Tania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917293184     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203856550     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Abraham, N. & Torok, N. (1978/1996). L'écorce et le noyau. Paris: Flammarion.
2. Applebee, A. N. (1978). The child's concept of a story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Baldry, A. P. (2004). Phase and transition, type and instance: patterns in media texts as seen through a multimodal concordancer. In K. O'Halloran (ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: systemic functional perspectives (pp. 83-108). London:Continuum.
4. Bergson, H. (1911). Creative evolution (trans. A. Mitchell). New York: Henry Holt.
5. Bollas, C. (1992). Being a character: psychoanalysis and self experience. London:Routledge.
6. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
8. Constantinou, O. (2005). Multimodal discourse analysis: media, modes and technologies. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 602-618.
9. Fogel, A. (2006). Dynamic systems research in interindividual communication:the transformation of meaning-making. Journal of Developmental Processes, 1, 7-28.
10. Freud, S. (1900/2001). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (ed. and trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (vols 4-5, pp. 1-630). London: Hogarth.
11. Gillespie, A. (2006). Becoming other: from social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: InfoAge.
12. Habermas, T. (1996/1999). Geliebte Objekte: Symbole und Instrumente der Identitätsbildung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp ["Loved objects: symbols and tools for identity construction"].
13. Harris, P. L. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Hijmans, E. (2004). Reading YES. Interpretative repertoires and identity construction in Dutch teenage magazines. Particip@tions, 1(2), available online at http//www.p@rticipations.org, retrieved 24 June 2007.
15. Hundeide, K. (2003). Becoming a committed insider. Culture and Psychology, 9(2), 107-127.
16. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29-57.
17. Ivinson, G. (2004). The social consequences of classroom art: collaboration, social identities and social representations. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (eds.), Collaborative creativity. Contemporary perspectives (pp. 96-109). London: Free Association Books.
18. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications reprint of [original publication]. Classics in the History of Psychology, an Internet resource developed by Christopher D. Green of York University, Toronto, Ontario.
19. Janet, P. (1934/1935). Les débuts de l'intelligence. Paris: Flammarion ["The beginnings of intelligence"].
20. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: the dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Miller, P. J., Hoogstra, L., Mintz, J., Fung, H. & Williams, K. (1993). Troubles in the garden and how they get resolved: a young child's transformation of his favorite story. In C. A. Nelson (ed.), Memory and affect in development (vol. 26, pp. 87-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Moro, C. & Rodriguez, C. (2005). L'objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé. Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. Berne: Peter Lang ["The object and the construction of its usage by the infant. A semiotic approach to preverbal development"].
23. Nelson, K. (2006). Development of representation in childhood. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craik (eds.), Lifespan cognition: mechanisms of change (pp. 178-192). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
25. Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mind: the evolution of a theory. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. Peirce, C. S. (1868a). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 1, 103-114.
27. Peirce, C. S. (1868b). Some consequences of four incapacities claimed for man. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 140-157. Available online at: http://member s.door.net/arisbe/arisbe.htm, retrieved 12 May 2005.
28. Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. London: William Heinemann.
29. nd edn). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
30. Tisseron, S. (1999). Comment l'esprit vient aux objets. Paris: L'Aubier ["How mind comes to objects"].
31. Tisseron, S. (2002). Les bienfaits des images. Paris: Odile Jacob.
32. nd edn). Paris: Dunod ["Shame: psychoanalysis of a social link"].
33. Valsiner, J. (2003). Beyond social representations: a theory of enablement. Papers on Social Representations, 12, 7.1-7.16, available online at http://www.psr.jku.at/, retrieved 14 August 2005.
34. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
35. Valsiner, J. (2008). Open intransitivity cycles in development and education: pathways to synthesis. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, 2, 131-147.
36. Valsiner, J. & Connolly, K. J. (2003). The nature of development: the continuing dialogue of processes and outcomes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. ix-xviii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. van Geert, P. (2006). Time, models, narratives: towards understanding the dynamics of life. Culture and Psychology, 12(4), 487-507.
38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/1997). Pensée et langage (trans. F. Sève, 3rd edn). Paris: La Dispute.
39. Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. New York: Wiley.
40. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Winnicott, D. W. (1959/1989). The fate of the transitional object. In C. Winnicott, R. Shepherd & M. Davis (eds.), Psycho-analytical explorations (pp. 53-58). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Winnicott, D. W. (1971/2001). Playing and reality. Philadelphia: Routledge.
43. Zittoun, T. (2005). Donner la vie, choisir un nom: engendrements symboliques. Paris:L'Harmattan ["Giving life, choosing a name: symbolic begetting"].
44. Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, CT: InfoAge.
45. Zittoun, T. (2007). Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions. Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 15(2), 193-211.