Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe: The politics of foreign direct investment

Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe: The politics of foreign direct investment

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-237

  Drahokoupil, Jan ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIETIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917131396     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203892084     Document Type: Book

References (555)

1. Abdelal, R. (2006). Writing the rules of global finance: France, Europe, and capital liberalization. Review of International Political Economy, 13(1), 1-27.
2. Adjoubei, I. (2004). FDI in European transition economies: A closer view. In UNECE (Ed.), Promoting foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS (pp. 15-21). Geneva: United Nations Publications.
3. Altshuler, D. S. (2001). Tunneling towards capitalism in the Czech Republic. Ethnography, 2(1), 115-138.
4. Amable, B. (2000). Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy, 7(4), 645-687.
5. AmCham Hungary. (2003). Encouraging foreign direct investment in Hungary. AmCham Position Brief, 1 (June).
6. AmCham Hungary. (2006). Annual report 2006. Budapest: Ammerican Chamber of Commerce in Hungary.
7. AmCham Hungary. (2007). Annual report 2007. Budapest: Ammerican Chamber of Commerce in Hungary.
8. AmCham Slovakia. (2002). Report on the activities of the labor law taskforce of AmCham Slovakia. Bratislava: AmCham Slovakia.
9. Amsden, A. H., Kochanowicz, J., and Taylor, L. (1994). The market meets its match: Restructuring the economies of Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.
10. Andrews, D. M. (1994). Capital mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 193-218.
11. Appel, H. (2000). The ideological determinants of liberal economic reform: The case of privatization. World Politics, 52, 520-549.
12. Appel, H. (2004). A new capitalist order: Privatization and ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
13. Appel, H. (2006). International imperatives and tax reform: Lessons from post-communist Europe. Comparative Politics, 39(1), 43-62.
14. Appel, H. and Gould, J. (2000). Identity politics and economic reform: Examining industry-state relations in the Czech and Slovak republics. Europe-Asia Studies, 52(1), 111-131.
15. Avdagic, S. (2005). State-labour relations in East Central Europe: Explaining variations in union effectiveness. Socio-Economic Review, 3(1), 25-53.
16. Babb, S. L. (2007). The banks and the beltway: Three decades of Washington politics and multilateral development institutions. Paper presented at the Brown University, Sociology Department Seminar Series, Providence, RI, 10 April.
17. Balcerowicz, E. (1995). Struktura Wlasnosciova ‘Listy 500’. Zycie Gospodarcze, 7 January
18. Balcerowicz, L. (1994). Democracy is no substitute for capitalism. Eastern European Economics, 32(2), 39-50.
19. Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Budapest and London: Central European University Press.
20. Baldwin, R. E. and Krugman, P. (2004). Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation. European Economic Review, 48(1), 1-23.
21. Banaszek, D., Dziemianowicz, W., Papliñski, A., Seges, R., Szemplinska, M., and Wolff, J. (1999). Inwestycje zagraniczne w gminie [Foreign investment in a region]. Warsaw: Skigraf on behalf of PAIiIZ.
22. Bandelj, N. (2002). Embedded economies: Social relations as determinants of foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Forces, 81(2), 411-444.
23. Bandelj, N. (2004). Negotiating global, regional, and national forces: Foreign investment in Slovenia. East European Politics and Societies, 18(3), 455-480.
24. Baran, P. (1957). The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
25. Barros, P. P. and Cabral, L. (2000). Competing for foreign direct investment. Review of International Economics, 8(2), 360-371.
26. Barta, G. (2002). A Magyar ipar területi folyamatai, 1945-2000 [Territorial processes of Hungarian Industry, 1945-2000]. Pécs: Dialóg-Campus.
27. Batra, G., Kaufmann, D., and Stone, A. H. W. (2003). Investment climate around the world: Voices of the firms from the World Business Environment Survey. Washington, DC: World Bank.
28. Baxandall, P. (2002). Hungary: Retrenchment amidst radical restructuring. In G. S. Goldberg and M. G. Rosenthal (Eds.), Diminishing welfare: A cross-national study of social provision (pp. 271-294). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
29. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371-400.
30. Becker, J. (2004). EU: Dependent development and the centre-periphery debate. Paper presented at the European Unification, Democratization and State: Germany and Turkey as Examples Seminar, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, 14-15 September.
31. Begg, B., Pickles, J., and Smith, A. (2003). Cutting it: European integration, trade regimes, and the reconfiguration of East-Central European apparel production. Environment and Planning A, 35, 2191-2207.
32. Benáček, V. and Zemplinerová, A. (1997). Foreign direct investment in the Czech manufacturing sector. Prague Economic Papers, 6, 141-155.
33. Bennett, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? [Review article]. British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215-233.
34. Berend, I. T. and Ranki, G. (1974). Economic development in East-Central Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries. New York and London: Columbia University Press.
35. Berger, S. and Dore, R. (Eds.). (1996). National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. Beyer, J. (2002). ‘Please invest in our country’-how successful were the tax incentives for foreign investment in transition countries? Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35, 192-211.
37. Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.
38. Bhaskar, R. (1994). Plato etcetera: The problems of philosophy and their resolution. New York: Verso.
39. Bieler, A. (2002). The struggle over EU enlargement: A historical materialist analysis of European integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 575-597.
40. Blaszczyk, B. and Woodward, R. (Eds.). (1999). Privatization and company restructuring in Poland (CASE Report No. 18). Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research.
41. Bléjer, M. I. and Coricelli, F. (1995). The making of economic reform in Eastern Europe: Conversations with leading reformers in Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
42. Blokker, P. (2005). Post-communist modernization, transition studies, and diversity in Europe. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(4), 503-525.
43. Bluszkowski, J. and Garlicki, J. (1996). Companies with foreign participation in their local environment. Warsaw: Centrum Badan Marketingowych ‘Indicator’.
44. Bockman, J. and Eyal, G. (2002). Eastern Europe as a laboratory for economic knowledge: The transnational roots of neoliberalism. American Journal of Sociology, 108(2), 310-352.
45. Bode, R. (1979). De Nederlandse bourgeoisie tussen de twee wereldoorlogen. Cahiers voor de Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen, 2(4), 9-50.
46. Boer-Ashworth, E. D. (2000). The global political economy and post-1989 change: The place of the Central European transition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Bohle, D. (2000). Internationalisation: An issue neglected in the path-dependency approach to post-communist transformation. In M. Dobry (Ed.), Democratic and capitalist transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the social sciences (pp. 235-261). Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Bohle, D. (2002). Europas neue Peripherie: Polens transformation und transnationale integration. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
49. Bohle, D. (2004). The EU and Eastern Europe: Failing the test as a better power. In L. Panitch and C. Leys (Eds.), Socialist Register 2005: The empire reloaded. London: The Merlin Press.
50. Bohle, D. (2006). Neoliberal hegemony, transnational capital and the terms of EU’s eastwards expansion. Capital and Class, 88, 57-86.
51. Bohle, D. (2008). Race to the bottom? Transnational companies and reinforced competition in the enlarged European Union. In B. Van Apeldoorn, J. Drahokoupil, and L. Horn (Eds.), European neoliberal governance and beyond (n.p. at time of writing). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
52. Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B. (2006a). Capitalism without compromise: Strong business and weak labor in Eastern Europe’s new transnational industries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(1), 3-25.
53. Bohle, D. and Greskovits, B. (2006b). Europeanization and the variety of competition states in Central-Eastern Europe. Unpublished manuscript.
54. Bohle, D. and Grèskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism, and neocorporatism: Paths towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443-466.
55. Bohle, D. and Husz, D. (2005). Whose Europe is it? Interest group action in accession negotiations: The cases of competition policy and labor migration. Politique Europeenne, 15, 85-112.
56. Böröcz, J. (1997). From comprador state to auctioneer state: Property change, realignment and peripheralization in post-state-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Available at: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~jborocz/state.htm.
57. Böröcz, J. (2004). Foreign direct legislation, informality, and the iron fist of liberal capitalism after the end of European state socialism. Paper presented at the inaugural workshop of ARCCGOR, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 17-18 December.
58. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
59. Braithwaite, J., Grootaert, C., and Milanovic, B.(Eds.). (1999). Poverty and social assistance in transition countries. New York: St Martin’s Press.
60. Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as re-territorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the EU. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431-451.
61. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S., and ILgen, T. (1985). Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63. Brom, K. and Orenstein, M. (1994). The privatised sector in the Czech Republic. Europe-Asia Studies, 46(6), 893-928.
64. Bryant, C. G. A. and Mokrzycki, E. (1994). Introduction: Theorizing the changes in East-Central Europe. In C. G. A. Bryant and E. Mokrzycki (Eds.), The new Great Transformation? Change and continuity in East-Central Europe (pp. 1-13). London: Routledge.
65. Buira, A. (2003). An analysis of IMF conditionality. G-24 Discussion Paper Series, 22. New York and Geneva: UN.
66. Bunce, V. (1999). The political economy of postsocialism. Slavic Review, 58(4), 756-793.
67. Burawoy, M. (1996). The state and economic involution: Russia through a China lens. World Development, 24(6), 1105-1117.
68. Bútorovà, Z. (Ed.). (1998). Democracy and discontent in Slovakia: A public opinion profile of a country in transition. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs.
69. Cain, M. J. G. (2003). The World Bank and the evolution of social protection in postcommunist societies. Paper presented at the Social Protection in Developing and Transitional Economies Seminar, Brown University, Watson Institute for International Studies, 29-30 May.
70. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
71. Campbell, J. L. and Pedersen, O. K. (1996). The evolutionary nature of revolutionary change in postcommunist Europe. In J. L. Campbell and O. K. Pedersen (Eds.), Legacies of change: Transformations of postcommunist European economies (pp. 201-249). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
72. Čapek, A. and Mertlik, P. (1996). Organizational and financial restructuring in Czech manufacturing enterprises, 1990-1995. In B. Blaszczyk and R. Woodward (Eds.), Privatization in post-communist countries. Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research.
73. Capik, P. (2007). Organising FDI promotion in Central-Eastern European regions. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 3(2), 152-163.
74. Cardoso, F. and Faletto, E. (1970/1979). Dependency and development in Latin America (trans. M. M. Urquidi). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
75. Cass, F. (2006). Attracting FDI to transition countries: The role and impact of incentives and promotion agencies. Unpublished manuscript.
76. CEPA. (2000). Ten years of policies of Bretton Woods institutions in Slovakia. Poniky: Center for Environmental Public Advocacy/Friends of the Earth-Slovakia.
77. Cerny, P. G. (1990). The changing architecture of politics: Structure, agency, and the future of the stat. London: Sage.
78. Cerny, P. G. (1995). Globalization and the changing logic of collective action. International Organization, 49(4), 595-625.
79. Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251-274.
80. Cemy, P. G. (2000). Restructuring the political arena: Globalization and the paradoxes of the competition state. In R. D. Germain (Ed.), Globalization and its critics: Perspectives from political economy (pp. 117-138). Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
81. Chossudovsky, M. (1997). The globalization of poverty: Impacts of IMF and World Bank reforms. London: Zed Books.
82. Claessens, S., Demirguc-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (1998). How does foreign entry affect the domestic banking market? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1918. Washington, DC: World Bank.
83. Clarke, S. E. (1990). Precious place: The local growth machine in an era of global restructuring. Urban Geography, 11(4), 185-193.
84. CNB. (1999). Zpráva o činnosti bankovního dohledu v České republice [Report on the activities of banking supervision in the Czech Republic]. Prague: Czech National Bank.
85. CNB. (2005). Přímé zahraniční investice za rok 2003 [Foreign direct investment, 2003]. Prague: Czech National Bank.
86. Cox, K. R. (1988). The politics of turf and the question of class. In J. R. Wolch and M. Dear (Eds.), The power of geography: How territory shapes social life (pp. 61-87). London: Allen and Unwin.
87. Cox, K. R. (1995). The local and the global in the new urban politics: A critical view. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11(4), 433-448.
88. Cox, K. R. and Mair, A. (1989). Urban growth machines and the politics of local economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 13(1), 137-146.
89. Cox, R. W. (1992). Global perestroika. In R. Miliband and L. Panitch (Eds.), Socialist register 1992 (pp. 26-43). London: Merlin Press.
90. Cox, T. M. and Mason, B. (2000). Interest groups and the development of tripartism in East Central Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 6(3), 328-347.
91. Crowley, S. and Ost, D. (Eds.). (2001). Workers after workers’ states: Labor and politics in postcommunist Eastern Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
92. Csába, L. (1997). Transformation in Hungary and (in) Hungarian Economics (1978-1996). Frankfurter Institut fur Transformationsstudien Discussion Paper, 6/97. Frankfurt: Institute for Transformation Studies.
93. Csaba, L. (2005). The new political economy of emerging Europe. Budapest: Akademia Kiado.
94. Csaki, G. (1995). Foreign direct investments in Hungary. In I. Zloch-Christy (Ed.), Privatization and foreign investments in Eastern Europe (pp. 107-129). London: Praeger.
95. Cull, R., Matesova, J., and Shirley, M. (2002). Ownership and the temptation to loot: Evidence from privatized firms in the Czech Republic. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30, 1-24.
96. CzechInvest. (2002). CzechInvest: The investment gateway to the Czech Republic, 1992-2002. Prague: CzechInvest.
97. CZSO. (2002). Statistical Yearbook of the Czech Republic. Prague: Scientia, and www.czso.cz.
98. CZSO. (2004). Statistical Yearbook of the Czech Republic. Prague: Scientia, and www.czso.cz.
99. CZSO. (2005). Statistical Yearbook of the Czech Republic. Prague: Scientia, and www.czso.cz.
100. Dangerfield, M. (1997). Ideology and the Czech transformation: Neoliberal rhetoric or neoliberal reality? East European Politics and Societies, 11(3), 436-469.
101. de Vries, B. A. (1997). The World Bank as an international player in economic analysis. In A. W. Coats (Ed.), The post-1945 internationalization of economics (pp. 225-244). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
102. Deloitte. (2006). Výsledky analýzy dopadů investičních pobídekv Moravskoslezském kraji. Prague: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu for CzechInvest.
103. Desai, R. M. (1995). Financial-market reform in the Czech Republic, 1991-1994: The revival of repression? CERGE-EI Working Paper Series, 86. Prague: CERGE-EI.
104. Desbordes, R. and Vauday, J. (2007). The political influence of foreign firms in developing countries. Economics and Politics, 19(3), 421-451.
105. Diczhàzi, B. (2000). The role of foreign capital in privatization. In B. Diczhàzi, C. György and Á. Macher (Eds.), Privatization in Hungary 1. Budapest: GJW-Consultatio on behalf of the Hungarian Privatization and State Holding Company (ÁPV Rt.).
106. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. (1983/1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
107. Dittert, J. and Kolanda, M. (1989). Spiše starost než chlouba [Worry rather than pride]. Hospodàřské noviny, 35, n.p.
108. Dobry, M. (Ed.). (2000). Democratic and capitalist transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the social sciences. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
109. Dolowitz, D. P. and Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5-24.
110. Domański, B. (2001a). Kapital zagraniczny w przemyśle Polski [Foreign capital in Polish industry]. Cracow: Institute of Geography and Spatial Management, Jagiellonian University.
111. Domański, B. (2001b). Poland: Labour and the relocation of manufacturing from the EU. In G. Gradev (Ed.), CEE countries in EU companies’ strategies of industrial restructuring and relocation (pp. 23-49). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
112. Domański, B. (2003). Industrial change and foreign direct investment in the postsocialist economy: The case of Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 99-118.
113. Domański, B. (2005). Transnational corporations and the postsocialist economy: Learning the ropes and forging new relationships in contemporary Poland. In C. G. Alvstam and E. W. Schamp (Eds.), Linking industries across the world: Processes of global networking (pp. 147-172). Aldershot: Ashgate.
114. Domhoff, G. W. (1996). State autonomy or class dominance? Case studies on policy-making in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
115. Drahokoupil, J. (2004). Post-Fordist capitalism in the Czech Republic: The investment of Flextronics in Brno. Czech Sociological Review, 40(3), 343-362.
116. Drahokoupil, J. (2005). From collectivization to globalization: Putting populism in its place. Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, Spring, 65-74.
117. Drahokoupil, J. (2007a). Analysing the capitalist state in post-socialism: Towards the Porterian workfare postnational regime. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), 401-424.
118. Drahokoupil, J. (2007b). The state of the capitalist state in East-Central Europe: Towards the Porterian workfare post-national regime? In B. S. Sergi, W. T. Bagatelas and J. Kubicová (Eds.), Industries and markets in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 175-196). Aldershot: Ashgate.
119. Drainville, A. C. (1994). International political economy in the age of open Marxism. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 105-132.
120. Drazen, A. (2002). Conditionality and ownership in IMF lending: A political economy approach. IMF Staff Papers, 49, 36-37.
121. Drazen, A. and Grilli, V. (1993). The benefits of crises for economic reform. American Economic Review, 83(3), 598-607.
122. Duménil, G. and Lévy, D. (2004). Capital resurgent: Roots of the neoliberal revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
123. Dunford, M. (1990). Theories of regulation. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8, 297-321.
124. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London and New York: Verso.
125. EBRD. (1996). Transition report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
126. EBRD. (1998). Transition report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
127. EBRD. (1999). Transition report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
128. EC. (1997). Agenda 2000-Commission opinion on the Czech Republic’s application for membership of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
129. EC. (1998). Regular report from the Commission on Czech Republic’s progress towards accession. Brussels: European Commission.
130. EC. (1999). Regular report from the Commission on Czech Republic’s progress towards accession. Brussels: European Commission.
131. EC. (2000). Regular report from the Commission on Czech Republic’s progress towards accession. Brussels: European Commission.
132. EC. (2001). Regular report from the Commission on Czech Republic’s progress towards accession. Brussels: European Commission.
133. EC. (2002). XXXIInd Report on competition policy, Part One. Brussels: European Commission.
134. Eden, L., Lemway, S., and Schuler, D. A. (2005). From the obsolescing bargain to the political bargaining model. In R. Grosse (Ed.), International business and government relations in the 21st century (pp. 251-272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Edwards, S. (1997). Trade liberalization reforms and the World Bank. American Economic Review, 87(2), 43-48.
136. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
137. EIU. (1998). Country profile 1998-99: Slovakia. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
138. EIU. (2004a). Country profile 2004: Hungary. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
139. EIU. (2004b). Country profile 2004: Slovakia. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
140. Ekiert, G. (2001). The state after state socialism: Poland in comparative perspective. IWM Working Paper, 6/2001. Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences.
141. Elkins, Z., Guzman, A. T., and Simmons, B. A. (2006). Competing for capital: The diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000. International Organization, 60(60), 811-846.
142. Ellingstadt, M. (1997). The maquiladora syndrome: Central European prospects. Europe-Asia Studies, 49(1), 7-21.
143. ELS. (2003). Přibĕh sedláka Rajtera-od kolektivizace ke globalizaci [Farmer Rajter’s Story-from Collectivization to Globalization]. Brno: EPS (Ekologický právní servis -Environmental Law Service).
144. ELS. (2004). L. G. Philips Displays Czech Republic: Quickly and illegally. Brno: Environmental Law Service.
145. Elster, J., Offe, C., and Boenker, F. (1998). Institutional design in post-communist societies: Rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Ernst and Young. (2003). European Investment Monitor 2003. London: Ernst and Young.
147. ERT. (1991). Reshaping Europe: A Report from the European Round Table of Industrialists. Brussels: European Roundtable of Industrialists.
148. Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
149. Evans, P. (1982). Reinventing the bourgeoisie: State entrepreneurship and class formation in dependent capitalist development. American Journal of Sociology, 88, S210-S247.
150. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
151. Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., and Skocpol, T.(Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
152. Eyal, G., Szelenyi, I., and Townsley, E. R. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists: Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist Central Europe. London and New York: Verso.
153. Farnsworth, K. (2004). Corporate power and social policy in a global economy: British welfare under the influence. Bristol: Policy Press.
154. Fassmann, M. and Čornĕjová, H. (2003). Czech Republic: National social dialogue on the formulation, implementation and monitoring of employment policies. Geneva: International Labour Office.
155. Federowicz, M. and Levitas, A. (1995). Poland: Councils under communism and neoliberalism. In J. Rogers and W. Streeck (Eds.), Works councils: Consultation, representation, and cooperation in industrial relations (pp. 283-312). Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.
156. Feldman, E. J. and Milch, J. (1982). Technocracy versus democracy: The comparative politics of international airports. Boston, MA: Auburn.
157. Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review, 81, 1146-1155.
158. Ferry, M. and McMaster, I. (2005). Implementing structural funds in Polish and Czech regions: Convergence, variation, empowerment? Regional and Federal Studies, 15(1), 19-39.
159. FIAS. (1999). Strengthening investment promotion agencies: The role of the private sector (unpublisher papers). Washington, DC: Foreign Investment Advisery Service.
160. Fish, M. S. (1998). The determinants of economic reform in the post-communist world. East European Politics and Societies, 12(1), 31-78.
161. Fisher, S. (2006). Political change in post-communist Slovakia and Croatia: From nationalist to Europeanist. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
162. Fisher, S., Gould, J., and Haughton, T. (2007). Slovakia’s neoliberal turn. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(6), 977-998.
163. Fougner, T. (2006). The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation: Is there a future beyond ‘the competition state’? Review of International Studies, 32, 165-185.
164. Franc, P. (2006). Summary of experiences on the situation of CSR in the EU-10. Paper presented at the Corporate Social Responsibility in the EU-10: Expectations vs. Reality Seminar, Prague, 15 September.
165. Frenkel, R. and O’Donnell, G. (1979). The ‘stabilization programs’ of the International Monetary Fund and their internal impact. In R. R. Fagen (Ed.), Capitalism and the state in US-Latin American relations (pp. 171-203). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
166. Frieden, J. and Rogowski, R. (1996). The impact of the international economy on national policies: An analytical overview. In R. O. Keohane and H. V. Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and domestic politics (pp. 25-47). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
167. Frydman, R., Murphy, K., and Rapaczynski, A. (1998). Capitalism with a comrade’s face. Budapest: Central European University Press.
168. Frye, T. (1997). Russian privatization and the limits of credible commitment. In D. Weimer (Ed.), The political economy of property rights (pp. 84-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. GAC. (2000). The attitudes towards foreign investors and employers (report for CzechInvest). Prague: Gabal, Analysis and Consulting.
170. Gandullia, L. (2004). Tax system and reforms in EU new member countries: An overview. Università di Genova, DISEFIN-Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Finanziarie Working Paper, 10/2004. Genova: DISEFIN.
171. Ganev, V. I. (2005). The ‘triumph of neoliberalism’ reconsidered: Critical remarks on ideas-centered analyses of political and economic change in post-communism. East European Politics and Societies, 19(3), 343-378.
172. Gardawski, J. (2001). Powracajaca klasa: Sektor prywatny w III Rzeczypospolitej [The resurrected class: Private sector in the Third Republic]. Warsaw: IFIS PAN.
173. GARDE/ELS. (2004). Prosazování investičního zámĕru nadnárodní společnosti NEMAK [Promotion of Nemak’s investment project]. Brno: GARDE (Global Alliance for Responsibility, Democracy, and Equity), the Environmental Law Service.
174. GARDE/ELS. (2006). Case study report: L. G. Philips Displays Czech Republic Ltd. Brno: GARDE (Global Alliance for Responsibility, Democracy, and Equity), the Environmental Law Service.
175. Garrett, G. and Lange, P. (1996). Internationalization, institutions, and political change. In R. O. Keohane and H. V. Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and domestic politics (pp. 48-75). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
176. Genschel, P. (2002). Globalization, tax competition, and the welfare state. Politics and Society, 39(2), 245-275.
177. Gill, S. (1990). American hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
178. Gill, S. (1993). Epistemology, ontology, and the ‘Italian school’. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, historical materialism and international relations (Vol. 26, pp. 21-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
179. Gill, S. (1998). European governance and new constitutionalism: Economic and monetary union and alternatives to disciplinary neoliberalism in Europe. New Political Economy, 3(1), 5-26.
180. Gill, S. and Law, D. (1989). Global hegemony and the structural power of capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-499.
181. Glassman, J. (1999). State power beyond the ‘territorial trap’: The internationalization of the state. Political Geography, 18, 669-696.
182. Glick Schiller, N. (2006). What can transnational studies offer the analysis of localized conflict and protest? Focaal-European Journal of Anthropology, 47, 3-17.
183. Gligorov, V. (1995). Republic of Slovenia: Country report. Vienna: Vienna Institute for Comparative Economic Studies.
184. Godfrey, M. and Richards, P. (1997). Employment policies and programmes in Central and Eastern Europe. Geneva: International Labour Office.
185. Goetz, E. G. (1994). Expanding possibilities in local development policy: An examination of US cities. Political Research Quarterly, 47(1), 85-109.
186. Gomulka, S. (1992). Polish economic reform, 1990-1991: Principles, policies and outcomes. Journal of Comparative Economics, 16, 355-372.
187. Gough, I. (1979). The political economy of the welfare state. London: Macmillan.
188. Gould, E. R. (2003). Money talks: Supplementary financiers and International Monetary Fund conditionality. International Organization, 57(3), 551-586.
189. Gould, J. (2001). Beyond creating owners: Privatization and democratization in the Slovak and Czech Republics, 1990-1998. Unpublished Ph.D., Columbia University.
190. Gould, J. (2003). Out of the blue? Democracy and privatization in postcommunist Europe. Comparative European Politics, 1, 277-311.
191. Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(4), 881-912.
192. Gourevitch, P. (1986). Politics in hard times: Comparative responses to international economic crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
193. Gowan, P. (1995). Neo-liberal theory and practice for Eastern Europe. New Left Review, I/213, 3-60.
194. Gowan, P. (1996). Eastern Europe, Western power and neo-liberalism. New Left Review, I/216, 129-140.
195. Grabbe, H. (2006). The EU’s transformative power: Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
196. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
197. Greskovits, B. (1998). The political economy of protest and patience: East European and Latin American transformations compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.
198. Greskovits, B. (2000). Hungary’s post-communist development in comparative perspective. In W. Baer and J. L. Love (Eds.), Liberalization and its consequences: A comparative perspective on Latin America and Eastern Europe (pp. 126-149). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
199. Greskovits, B. (2005). Leading sectors and the variety of capitalism in Eastern Europe. Actes du GERPISA, 39, 113-128.
200. Greskovits, B. (2006). The first shall be the last? Hungary’s road to the EMU. In K. Dyson (Ed.), Enlarging the Euro-zone: The Euro and the transformation of East Central Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
201. Greskovits, B. and Bohle, D. (2001). Development paths on Europe’s periphery: Hungary’s and Poland’s return to Europe compared. Polish Sociological Review, 133(1), 3-28.
202. Grosfeld, I. (1992). Reform economics and Western economic theory: Unexploited opportunities. In J. M. Kovacs and M. Tardos (Eds.), Reform and transformation in Eastern Europe (pp. 62-79). London: Routledge.
203. Gurr, L. A. (2001). The language of liberal economic reform in post-communist Poland, 1989-1999. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 19(2), 33-41.
204. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(2), 1-35.
205. Haggard, S. (1990). Pathways from the periphery: The politics of growth in the newly industrializing countries. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
206. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigm, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296.
207. Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
208. Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957.
209. Haney, L. A. (2002). Inventing the needy: Gender and the politics of welfare in Hungary. Berkeley: University of California Press.
210. Hanley, E., King, L., and Janos, I. T. (2002). The state, international agencies, and property transformation in postcommunist Hungary. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 129-167.
211. Hanousek, J., Nĕmečíek, L., and Hájková, D. (2002). The Czech Republic’s banking sector: Emerging from turbulent times, CERGE-EI Discussion Paper Series, 83. Prague: CERGE-EI.
212. Hanson, P. (2007). The European Union’s influence on the development of capitalism in Central Europe. In D. Lane (Ed.), The transformation of state socialism: System change, capitalism or something else? (pp. 95-112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
213. Harding, A. (1995). Elite theory and growth machines. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, and H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 35-52). London: Sage.
214. Hardy, J. (1998). Cathedrals in the desert? Transnationals, corporate strategy and locality in Wroclaw. Regional Studies, 32(7), 639-652.
215. Hardy, J. (2004). Rebuilding local governance in post-communist economies: The case of Wroclaw, Poland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(4), 303-320.
216. Hardy, J. (2007). The new competition and the new economy: Poland in the international division of labour. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(5), 761-778.
217. Hardy, J. and Zebrowski, A. (2005). Poland and the new Europe. International Socialism, 108, 39-51.
218. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
219. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
220. Havel, J. (2004). Privatizace bank (kritick ý pohled na tuzemskou privatizační praxi) [Bank privatization (Critical view of the Czech deal)]. Politická ekonomie, 5(1), 17-33.
221. Havrda, M. (2003). The Czech Republic: The case of delayed transformation. In M. Federowicz and R. V. Aguilera (Eds.), Corporate governance in a changing economic and political environment: Trajectories of institutional change (pp. 121-143). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
222. Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
223. Hay, C. (2004a). Common trajectories, variable paces, divergent outcomes? Models of European capitalism under conditions of complex economic interdependence. Review of International Political Economy, 11(2), 231-262.
224. Hay, C. (2004b). Re-stating politics, re-politicising the state: Neo-liberalism, economic imperatives and the rise of the competition state. In A. Gamble and T. Wright (Eds.), Restating the state? (pp. 38-50). Oxford: Blackwell.
225. Hellman, J. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics, 50(2), 203-234.
226. Hellman, J., Jones, G., and Kaufmann, D. (2000). Are foreign investors and multinationals engaging in corrupt practices in transition economies? Transition, May-July, 4-7.
227. Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A., and Guillén, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977-1999. American Sociological Review, 70, 871-897.
228. Hills, J. (1986). Deregulating telecoms: Competition and control in the United States, Japan and Britain. London: Pinter.
229. Hira, A. (1998). Ideas and economic policy in Latin America: Regional, national, and organizational case studies. Westport, CT: Praeger.
230. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
231. Hobson, J. A. (1902). Imperialism: A study. New York: James Pott.
232. Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P. C., and Streeck, W. (1994). Capitalism, sectors, institutions, and performance. In J. R. Hollingsworth, P. C. Schmitter and W. Streeck (Eds.), Governing capitalist economies: Performance and control of economic sectors (pp. 4–16). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
233. Holman, O. (1998). Integrating Eastern Europe: EU expansion and the double transformation in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. International Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 12–43.
234. Holman, O. (2001). The enlargement of the European Union towards Central and Eastern Europe: The role of supranational and transnational actors. In A. Bieler and A. D. Morton (Eds.), Social forces in the making of the new Europe (pp. 161–184). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
235. Holman, O. (2004a). Asymmetrical regulation and multidimensional governance in the European Union. Review of International Political Economy, 11(4), 714–735.
236. Holman, O. (2004b). Integrating peripheral Europe: The different roads to ‘security and stability’ in Southern and Central Europe. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(2), 208–236.
237. Holzinger, K. and Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796.
238. Horowitz, S. and Petráš, M. (2003). Pride and prejudice in Prague: Understanding early policy error and belated reform in the Czech economic transition. East European Politics and Societies, 17(2), 231–265.
239. Hunya, G. (1998). Integration of CEEC manufacturing into European corporate structures by direct investments. MOCT-MOST, 8(2), 69–90.
240. Hunya, G. (2000). Foreign penetration in Central European manufacturing. In G. Hunya (Ed.), Integration through foreign direct investment: Making Central European industries competitive (pp. 111–129). Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
241. Husák, P. (1997). Budování kapitalismu v Cˇechách: Rozhovory s Tomásˇem Jezˇkem [Building capitalism in Bohemia: Interviews with Tomásˇ Jezˇek]. Prague: Volvox Globator.
242. Innes, A. (2001). The new state builders: 1993–2000. In Czechoslovakia: The short goodbye (pp. 220–272). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
243. ITDH. (2007). Incentive system in Hungary. Budapest: Hungarian Investment and Trade Development Agency.
244. Ivanova, M. N. (2007). Why there was no ‘Marshall Plan’ for Eastern Europe and why this still matters. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 15(3), 345–376.
245. Iversen, T. and Pontusson, J. (2000). Comparative political economy: A Northern European perspective. In T. Iversen, J. Pontusson, and D. Soskice (Eds.), Unions, employers and central banks: Macroeconomic coordination and institutional change in social market economies (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
246. Jasiecki, K. (2002). Elita biznesu w Polsce: Drugie narodziny kapitalizmu [Polish business elite: Capitalism’s second birth]. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
247. Jensen, C. (2006). Foreign direct investment and economic transition: Panacea or pain killer? Europe–Asia Studies, 58(6), 881–902.
248. Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587-616.
249. Jessop, B. (1982). The capitalist state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
250. Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
251. Jessop, B. (1994). Post-Fordism and the state. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism. A Reader (pp. 251-279). Oxford: Blackwell.
252. Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.
253. Jessop, B. (2003). Recent societal and urban change: Principles of periodization and views on the current period. In N. Albertsen, P. Hemmersam and T. Nielsen (Eds.), Urban mutations: Periodizations, scales and mobilities. Aarhus: Arkitektskolens Forlag.
254. Jonas, A. E. G. and Wilson, D. (Eds.). (1999). The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
255. Kahler, M. (1992). External influence, conditionality, and the politics of adjustment. In S. Haggard and R. R. Kaufman (Eds.), The politics of economic adjustment: International constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state (pp. 89-138). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
256. Kalb, D. (1997). Expanding class: Power and everyday politics in industrial communities, the Netherlands, 1850-1950. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
257. Kalb, D. (2006). Uses of local knowledge. In R. E. Goodin and C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 579-594). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
258. Kalb, D. and Tak, H. (2005). Critical junctions-Recapturing anthropology and history. In D. Kalb and H. Tak (Eds.), Critical junctions: Anthropology and history beyond the cultural turn (pp. 1-27). New York: Berghahn.
259. Kalotay, K. and Hunya, G. (2000). Privatization and FDI in Central and Eastern Europe. Transnational Corporations, 9(1), 39-66.
260. Kapoor, M. and Eddy, K. (1998). Two-track Hungary: A survey of Hungarian industry. Business Central Europe, 5(50), 41-49.
261. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.
262. Keohane, R. O. and Milner, H. V. (Eds.). (1996). Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
263. Kerr, C. (1984). Future of industrial societies: Convergence or continuing diversity? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
264. King, L. P. (2001a). Making markets: A comparative study of postcommunist managerial strategies in Central Europe. Theory and Society, 30(4), 493-538.
265. King, L. P. (2001b). The basic features of postcommunist capitalism in Eastern Europe: Firms in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. London and Westport, CT: Praeger.
266. King, L. P. (2002). Postcommunist divergence: A comparative analysis of the transition to capitalism in Poland and Russia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(3), 3-34.
267. King, L. P. (2007). Does neoliberalism work? Comparing economic and sociological explanations. Economic Sociology: The European Electronic Newsletter, 8(2), 10-17.
268. Kiss, J. P. (2001). Industrial mass production and regional differentiation in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(4), 321-328.
269. Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G., and Stephens, J. D. (Eds.). (1999). Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
270. Klaus, V., and Tříska, D. (1994). Review of Janos Kornai’s ‘The socialist system: The political economy of communism’. In Dismantling socialism, an interim report: A compendium of texts from the years 1992-1994. Prague: Office of Government.
271. Klich, J. and Lipiec, G. (2000). The development of small and medium-sized enterprises in Poland. SOCO Project Paper, 74. Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences.
272. Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764-774.
273. Kolanda, M. (1989). Ke strategii rozvoje čs. strojírenství v letech 1990-2010 [Strategy of development of engineering and electrotechnical industry 1990-2010]. Prague: Progno-stický ústav ČSAV (Institute for Economic Forecasting, Czech Academy of Science).
274. Kolesár, P. (2006). Race to the bottom? The role of investment incentives in attracting strategic automotive foreign direct investment in Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University.
275. Kolodko, G. W. (2000). From shock to therapy: The political economy of postsocialist transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
276. Kopecký, P. and Mudde, C. (2000). What has Eastern Europe taught us about the democratisation literature (and vice versa)? European Journal of Political Research, 37, 517-539.
277. Kotrba, J. (1997). Privatizačni proces v Ceské republice: Aktéri a výtezové [Privatization process in the Czech Republic: Players and winners]. In J. Švejnar (Ed.), Česká republika a ekonomická transformace ve střední a východní Evropĕ [The Czech Republic and the economic transformation in Central and Eastern Europe] (pp. 133-168). Prague: Academia.
278. Kotrba, J., Kocenda, E., and Hanousek, J. (1999). The governance of privatization funds in the Czech Republic. In M. Simoneti, S. Estrin, and A. Böhm (Eds.), The governance of privatization funds: Experiences of the Czech Republic, Poland, and Slovenia. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
279. Kouba, K., Vychodil, O., and Roberts, J. (2005). Privatizace bez kapitalu: Zvýšené náklady české transformace [Privatization without capital: Elevated costs of the Czech transformation]. Prague: Karolinum.
280. Kubicek, P. (2004). Organized labor in postcommunist states: From solidarity to infirmity. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
281. Kudrna, Z. (2004). Getting the institutions right: Reforms of banking sectors in the Czech Republic and Romania. Unpublished MA, Central European University, Budapest.
282. Kudrna, Z., Bauer, M., Cvrček, T., Janoušová, J., Knot, O., Koleček, L., et al. (2002a). Příloha A: Rešerše na téma propojení IPB s politickou sférou [Appendix A: Exploration of the links of IPB on the political sphere]. In Vzestup a pád Investiční a poštovní banky [The rise and fall of Investiční a poštovní Bank] Prague: e-Merit.
283. Kudrna, Z., Bauer, M., Cvrček, T., Janoušová, J., Knot, O., Koleček, L., et al. (2002b). Vzestup a pád Investiční a poštovní banky [The rise and fall of Investicni a postovni bank] Prague: e-Merit.
284. Kulcsar, L. J. and Domokos, T. (2005). The post-socialist growth machine: The case of Hungary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(3), 550-563.
285. Kupka, M. (1992). Transformation of ownership in Czechoslovakia. Soviet Studies, 44(2), 297-311.
286. Kurth, J. R. (1979). The political consequences of the product cycle: Industrial history and political outcomes. International Organization, 33(1), 1-34.
287. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1984). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
288. Lake, R. (1990). Urban fortunes: A commentary. Urban Geography, 11(2), 179-184.
289. Lall, S. (1987). Learning to industrialize. London: Macmillan.
290. Lane, D. (2005). Revolution, class and globalization in the transition from state socialism. European Societies, 7(1), 131-155.
291. Lewis, C. P. (2005). How the East was won: The impact of multinational companies on Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
292. Lindstrom, N. and Piroska, D. (2007). The politics of privatization and Europeanization in Europe’s periphery: Slovenian banks and breweries for sale? Competition and Change, 11(2), 117-135.
293. Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. C. (1996a). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
294. Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. C. (1996b). Toward consolidated democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14-33.
295. Lloyd, J. (1994). How to make a market. London Review of Books, 10 November.
296. Logan, J. R. and Molotch, H. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
297. Machonin, P., Tuček, M., and Nekola, M. (2006). The Czech economic elite after fifteen years of post-socialist transformation. Czech Sociological Review, 42(3), 537-556.
298. MacLeod, G. and Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503-527.
299. Mahon, R. (1977). Canadian public policy: The unequal structure of representation. In L. Panitch (Ed.), The Canadian state: Political economy and political power (pp. 165-198). Toronto, Buffalo, NY, and London: University of Toronto Press.
300. Majtan, B. (2005). The labour code in the Republic of Slovakia. Employee Relations, 27(6), 603-612.
301. Mallya, T. J. S., Kukulka, Z., and Jensen, C. (2004). Are incentives a good investment for the host country? An empirical evaluation of the Czech National Incentive Scheme. Transnational Corporations, 13(1), 109-148.
302. Manning, N. (2004). Diversity and change in pre-accession Central and Eastern Europe since 1989. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(3), 211-232.
303. Marcinčin, A. and Beblavý, M. (Eds.). (2000). Economic policy in Slovakia 1990-1999. Bratislava: Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Centre for Social and Media Analysis, and INEKO.
304. Martin, R. (1998). Central and Eastern Europe and the international economy: The limits to globalisation. Europe-Asia Studies, 50(1), 7-26.
305. Martin, R. (1999). Transforming management in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
306. Matĕjů, P. and Vlachová, K. (1998). Values and electoral decisions in the Czech Republic. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 31(3), 249-269.
307. McDermott, G. A. (1997). Renegotiating the ties in Czech industry. In G. Grabher and D. Stark (Eds.), Restructuring networks: Legacies, linkages, and localities in postsocialism (pp. 70-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
308. McDermott, G. A. (2002). Embedded politics: Industrial networks and institutional change in postcommunism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
309. McDermott, G. A. (2004). Institutional change and firm creation in East-Central Europe: An embedded politics approach. Comparative Political Studies, 37(2), 188-217.
310. McKinsey. (2002). Business consequences of EU enlargement: Major change or nonevent? [McKinsey contribution to the European Business Summit, Brussels, May]. Brussels: McKinsey and Company.
311. McMaster, I. (2006). Czech regional development agencies in a shifting institutional landscape. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(3), 347-370.
312. McMenamin, I. (2004). Parties, promiscuity and politicisation: Business-political networks in Poland. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 657-576.
313. McMenamin, P. and Hill, S. (2004). Survey of performance of investment promotion agencies. In Promoting foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS (pp. 25-38). Geneva: United Nations Publications.
314. McMichael, P. (1990). Incorporating comparison within a world-historical perspective: An alternative comparative method. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 385-397.
315. Meaney, C. S. (1995). Foreign experts, capitals, and competing agendas: Privatization in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. Comparative Political Studies, 28(2), 275-305.
316. Mejstřík, M. (1997). The privatization process in East-Central Europe: Evolutionary process of Czech privatization. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic.
317. Mencinger, J. (1996). Privatization experiences in Slovenia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 67, 415-428.
318. MESA10. (1998). Slovak Monthly Report VI. Bratislava: Center for Economic and Social Analyses.
319. Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., and Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144-181.
320. Meyer, K. E. and Jensen, C. (2005). Foreign direct investment and government policy in Central and Eastern Europe. In R. Grosse (Ed.), International business and government relations in the 21st century (pp. 119-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
321. MIGA-FIAS. (2005). Competing for FDI: Inside the operations of four national investment promotion agencies. Washington, DC: Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency and Foreign Investment Advisery Service.
322. Mihalik, J. (2003). Medzinárodná komparácia sociálno-ekonomického rozvoja a konvergencia SR s EÚ: Znovuoživenie ekonomiky v recesii [International comparison of socio-economic development and convergence in Slovakia and the EU: Revitalization of the economy in the recession]. Bratislava: IRIS.
323. Mihályi, P. (1993). Hungary: A unique approach to privatization-past, present and future. In I. Szekely and D. M. G. Newbery (Eds.), Hungary: An economy in transition (pp. 84-117). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
324. Mihályi, P. (2001). The evolution of Hungary’s approach to FDI in post-communist privatization. Transnational Corporations, 10(3), 61-73.
325. Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. London: Quartet Books.
326. MIT. (2003). Analýzy vybraných finančních ukazatelů firem podpořených investicními pobídkami [An analysis of selected financial indicators offirms supported by investment incentives]. Prague: Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic.
327. MIT. (2004). Analýza vlivu firem podpořenych investicními pobídkami na vybrané indikátory české ekonomiky [An analysis of the influence of companies supported by the investment incentives on the selected indicators of the Czech economy]. Prague: Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic.
328. MIT. (2006). Vyhodnocení investičních pobídek ve zpracovatelském průmyslu [Investment incentives in manufacturing: Evaluation]. Prague: Ministry of Industry and Trade.
329. Mládek, J. (2002). Kupónová privatizace: Politický úspĕich, ekonomické selhání [Voucher privatization: Political success, economic failure]. In Kupónová privatizace. Prague: Centre for Economics and Politics.
330. Molotch, H. L. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309-332.
331. Müller, B. (2002). Say it in rimes. Hits below the belt in Czech village politics. Focaal -European Journal of Anthropology, 39, 29-39.
332. Müller, B. and Kohutek, P. (2002). Engaging the new democracy. The power of participation in the post-communist Czech Republic. Focaal-European Journal of Anthropology, 40, 67-81.
333. Murrell, P. (1993). What is shock therapy? What did it do in Poland and Russia? Post-Soviet Affairs, 9, 111-140.
334. Murrell, P. (1995). The transition according to Cambridge, Mass. Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 164-178.
335. Myant, M. (1989). The Czechoslovak economy 1948-1988: The battle for economic reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
336. Myant, M. (1993). Transforming socialist economies: The case of Poland and Czechoslovakia. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
337. Myant, M. (1999). Inward investment and structural transformation. In A. Lorentzen, B. Widmaier, and M. Laki (Eds.), Institutional change and industrial development in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 61-84). Aldershot: Ashgate.
338. Myant, M. (2000). Employers’ interest representation in the Czech Republic. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 16(4), 1-21.
339. Myant, M. (2003). The rise and fall of Czech capitalism: Economic development in the Czech Republic since 1989. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
340. Myant, M. (2004). Czech capitalism-Towards a European model? Paper presented at the Managing the Economic Transition, 13th Research Seminar ‘What Type of Capitalism in the Post-Communist Economies?’, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
341. Myant, M. (2007a). Economic transition in the Czech Republic: A qualified success. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(3), 431-450.
342. Myant, M. (2007b). The Czech Republic. In C. Phelan (Ed.), Trade union revitalisation: Trends and prospects in 34 countries (pp. 335-346). Oxford: Peter Lang.
343. Myant, M., Fleischer, F., Hornschild, K., Vintrova, R., Zeman, K., and Souciek, Z. (1996). Successful transformations? The creation of market economies in Eastern Germany and the Czech Republic. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
344. Myant, M. and Smith, S. (1999). Czech trade unions in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 5(3), 265-285.
345. Navaretti, G. B. and Venables, A. J. (2004). Multinational firms in the world economy. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
346. Nelson, J. M. (2001). The politics of pension and healthcare reforms in Hungary and Poland. In J. Kornai, S. Haggard, and R. R. Kaufman (Eds.), Reforming the state: Fiscal and welfare reform in post-socialist countries (pp. 235-266). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
347. Nelson, R. R. (1994). Evolutionary theorizing about economic change. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 108-136). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
348. NextFinance. (2005). Studie dopadu projektu Hyundai Motor Company na českou ekonomiku [Impact of the Hyundai Motor Company project on Czech economy]. Prague: NextFinance.
349. Nezhyba, J. (2006). Kritické hodnocení zahraničnich investic a investičnich pobídek v ČR [Critical evaluation of FDI in the Czech Republic]. Paper presented at Příme zahraniční investice a investiční pobídky v širším kontextu, Prague, 15 June.
350. Nölke, A. and Vliegenthart, A. (2006). Varieties of capitalism meet world system theory: Which type of capitalism for the East Central European semi-periphery? Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, San Diego, 22-25 March.
351. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.
352. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
353. Nuti, D. M. (1999). Employee ownership in Polish privatizations. In P. Hare, J. Batt, and S. Estrin (Eds.), Reconstituting the market: The political economy of microeconomic transformation (pp. 81-98). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
354. Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.
355. O’Brien, R. (1992). Global financial integration: The end of geography. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.
356. O’Donnell, G. (1978). Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review, 13(1), 3-38.
357. O’Donnell, G. (1996). Illusions about consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 34-51.
358. O’Dwyer, C. and Kovalčík, B. (2007). And the last shall be first: Party system institutionalization and second-generation economic reform in postcommunist Europe. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(4), 3-26.
359. OECD. (1997). OECD economic surveys: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
360. OECD. (1999). OECD economic surveys: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
361. OECD. (2000). OECD Reviews of foreign direct investment: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
362. OECD. (2001). Territorial reviews: Hungary. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
363. OECD. (2004). Territorial reviews: Czech Republic. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
364. OECD. (2005). International investment perspectives. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
365. OECD. (2006). OECD Factbook2006: Economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
366. Offe, C. and Ronge, V. (1975). Theses on the theory of the state. New German Critique, 6, 137-147.
367. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless word: Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. London: Collins.
368. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public good and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
369. Orenstein, M. A. (1996). The Czech tripartite council and its contribution to social peace. In A. Agh and G. Ilonszki (Eds.), Parliaments and organized interests: The second steps. Budapest: Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies.
370. Orenstein, M. A. (2001). Out of the red: Building capitalism and democracy in postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
371. Orenstein, M. A. and Haas, M. R. (2005). Globalization and the future of welfare states in post-communist East-Central European countries. In M. Glatzer and D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Politics matters: Globalization and the future of welfare states (pp. 130-152). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
372. Ost, D. (1992). Labour and societal transition. Problems of Communism, 33(5-6), 48-51.
373. Ost, D. (2000). Illusory corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal tripartism and postcommunist class identities. Politics and Society, 28(4), 503-530.
374. Ost, D. (2002). The weakness of strong social movements: Models of unionism in the East European context. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1), 33-51.
375. Ost, D. (2005). The defeat of solidarity: Anger and politics in postcommunist Europe. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
376. Overbeek, H. (1989). British capitalism at the crossroads. International Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 36-75.
377. Overbeek, H. (1990). Global capitalism and national decline: The Thatcher decade in perspective. London: Unwin Hyman.
378. Overbeek, H. and van der Pijl, K. (1993). Restructuring capital and restructuring hegemony: Neo-liberalism and the unmaking of the post-war order. In H. Overbeek (Ed.), Restructuring hegemony in the global political economy: The rise of transnational neoliberalism in the 1980s (pp. 1-27). London and New York: Routledge.
379. Paci, P., Sasin, M. J., and Verbeek, J. (2004). Economic growth, income distribution and poverty in Poland during transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3467. Washington, DC: World Bank.
380. PAIiIZ. (2004). Yearbook 2003. Warsaw: Polish Information and Foreign Investment Agency.
381. PAIiIZ. (2007). Investment incentives scheme in Poland. Warsaw: Polish Information and Foreign Investment Agency.
382. Panitch, L. (1996). Rethinking the role of the state. In J. H. Mittelman (Ed.), Globalization: Critical reflections (pp. 83-113). London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
383. Pàralovà, A. (2004). Více svobody, ménĕ regulace [More freedom, less regulation]. Prague: Civic Democratic Party.
384. Pavlínek, P. (1998). Foreign direct investment in the Czech Republic. Professional Geographer, 50(1), 71-85.
385. Pavlínek, P. (2002a). Restructuring the Central and Eastern European automobile industry: Legacies, trends, and effects of foreign direct investment. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics, 43(1), 41-77.
386. Pavlínek, P. (2002b). The role of foreign direct investment in the privatisation and restructuring of the Czech motor industry. Post-Communist Economies, 14(3), 359-379.
387. Pavlínek, P. (2003). Transformation of the Czech automotive components industry through foreign direct investment. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 44(3), 186-209.
388. Pavlínek, P. (2004a). Regional development implications of foreign direct investment in Central Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 11(1), 47-70.
389. Pavlínek, P. (2004b). Transformation of the Central and East European passenger car industry: Selective peripheral integration through foreign direct investment. In D. Turnock (Ed.), Foreign direct investment and regional development in East Central Europe and the former Soviet Union: A collection of essays in memory of Professor Francis ‘Frank’ Carter (pp. 71-102). Aldershot: Ashgate.
390. Pavlínek, P. (2006). Restructuring of the Polish passenger car industry through foreign direct investment. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47(3), 353-377.
391. Pavlínek, P. and Janák, L. (2007). Internationalization and the domestic industry: Restructuring of the ¡Skoda Auto supplier network. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 133-155.
392. Pavlínek, P. and Smith, A. (1998). Internationalization and embeddedness in East-Central European transition: The contrasting geographies of inward investment in the Czech and Slovak republics. Regional Studies, 32(7), 619-638.
393. Peck, J. A. (2001a). Neoliberalizing states: Thin policies/hard outcowmes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 445-455.
394. Peck, J. A. (2001b). Workfare states. New York: Guilford Press.
395. Peck, J. A. and Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34, 380-404.
396. Pezdir, R. (2006). Thirteen years of gradualism-Inhibiting transition in Slovenia? PostCommunist Economies, 18(1), 51-68.
397. Pick, M. (1991). Rizika a alternativy hospodářeké politky [Risks and alternatives of economic policy]. Národní hospodářství, 9, n.p.
398. Pickles, J. and Smith, A. (2004). Technologies of transition: Foreign investment and the (re-)articulation of East Central Europe into the global economy. In D. Turnock (Ed.), Foreign direct investment and regional development in East Central Europe and the former Soviet Union: A collection of essays in memory of Professor Francis ‘Frank’ Carter (pp. 21-37). Aldershot: Ashgate.
399. Pickles, J., Smith, A., Bucek, M., Roukova, P., and Begg, R. (2005). Liberalization, integration, and convergence: Pan-European production networks, post-socialist apparel, and the embedded geographies of competition. Paper presented at the Europe: Our Common Home? seventh ICCEES World Congress, panel: ‘Theorizing Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe’, Berlin, 25-30 July.
400. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
401. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
402. Piroska, D. (2002). Varieties of debt management in Central and East European countries: An institutional investigation of international financial transactions. Copenhagen Business School Intercultural Management and Communication Department Working Paper, 1029. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
403. Polak, J. (1997). The contribution of the International Monetary Fund. In A. W. Coats (Ed.), The post-1945 internationalization of economics (pp. 211-224). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
404. Polák, M. (2004). Slovakia: From ‘national capitalism’ to EU liberalism (and beyond?). Kurswechsel, 1, 70-78.
405. Polillo, S. and Guillén, M. F. (2005). Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1764-1802.
406. Pollert, A. (2001). Labor and trade unions in the Czech Republic, 1989-2000. In S. Crowley and D. Ost (Eds.), Workers after workers’ states: Labor and politics in postcommunist Eastern Europe (pp. 13-36). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
407. Pontusson, J. (1992). The limits of social democracy: Investment politics in Sweden. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
408. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan.
409. Porter, M. E., Sala-i-Martin, X., Lopez-Carlos, A., and Schwab, K.(Eds.). (2004). The global competitiveness report, 2003-2004. New York: Oxford University Press.
410. Potůček, M. (2004). Accession and social policy: The case of the Czech Republic. Journal of European Social Policy, 14(3), 253-266.
411. Poulantzas, N. (1974/1978). Classes in contemporary capitalism. London: NLB.
412. Poulantzas, N. (1976). The crisis of the dictatorships. London: New Left Books.
413. Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, power, socialism. London: New Left Books.
414. Prasad, M. (2006). The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
415. Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988). Structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review, 82(1), 11-29.
416. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
417. Radaelli, C. M. (2004). The puzzle of regulatory competition. Journal of Public Policy, 24(1), 1-23.
418. Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
419. Rao, H. and Hirsch, P. (2003). ‘Czechmate’: The old banking elite and the construction of investment privatization funds in the Czech Republic. Socio-Economic Review, 1(2), 247-269.
420. Reich, R. B. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st-century capitalism. New York: Vintage.
421. Riker, W. and Weimer, D. (1993). The economic and political liberalization of socialism: The fundamental problem of property rights. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10(2), 79-102.
422. Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., and Sikking, K. (Eds.). (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
423. Rohrschneider, R. and Whitefield, S. (2004). Support for foreign ownership and integration in Eastern Europe: Economic interests, ideological commitments, and democratic context. Comparative Political Studies, 37(3), 331-339.
424. Róna-Tas, Á. (1998). Path dependence and capital theory: Sociology of the post-communist economic transition. East European Politics and Societies, 12(1), 107-131.
425. Roseberry, W. (1994). Hegemony and the language of contention. In G. M. Joseph and D. Nugent (Eds.), Everyday forms of state formation: Revolution and the negotiation of rule in modern Mexico (pp. 355-366). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
426. Rosenau, J. N. (1969). Toward the study of national-international linkages. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), Linkage politics: Essays on the convergence of national and international systems (pp. 44-63). New York: Free Press.
427. Rothstein, B. (1996). The social democratic state: The Swedish model and the bureacratic problem of social reforms. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
428. Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains? In J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305-336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
429. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar order. International Organization, 36(2), 379-415.
430. Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke, A. (1998). Multinational enterprises and public policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 115-136.
431. Rutland, P. (1992-1993). Thatcherism, Czech style: Transition to capitalism in the Czech Republic. Telos, 94, 103-124.
432. Sachs, J. (1990). Eastern Europe’s economies: What is to be done? The Economist, 12 January, 19-24.
433. Sachs, J. (1995). Postcommunist parties and the politics of entitlements. Transition, 6(3), 1-4.
434. Sacks, P. M. (1980). State structure and the asymmetrical society: An approach to public policy in Britain [review article]. Comparative Politics, 12(3), 349-376.
435. Sadler, D. and Swain, A. (1994). State and market in Eastern Europe: Regional development and workplace implications of direct foreign investment in the automobile industry in Hungary. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS 19(4), 387-403.
436. SAO. (2004). Vĕstník NKÜ 2004 [The bulletin of the SAO 2004]. Prague: Supreme Audit Office.
437. Sass, M. (2003a). Competitiveness and economic policies related to foreign direct investment. Working Paper of the Ministry of Finance, Hungary, 3. Budapest: Ministry of Finance.
438. Sass, M. (2003b). The effectiveness of host country policy measures in attracting FDI: The case of Hungary. In The development dimension of FDI: Policy and rule-making perspectives (pp. 49-58). Geneva: UNCTAD.
439. Sass, M. (2004). FDI in Hungary-the first mover’s advantage and disadvantage. European Investment Bank Papers, 9(2), 62-90.
440. Sayer, R. A. (2000). Realism and social science. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
441. Scharpf, F. W. (2002). The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645-670.
442. Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2005). Conclusions: The impact of the EU on the accession countries. In F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier (Eds.), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 109-153). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
443. Schoenman, R. (2005). Captains or pirates? State-business relations in post-socialist Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 19(1), 40-75.
444. Schwarz, J. (2003). Transformace, reforma a treti cesta [Reform, transition, and the third way]. Politickâ ekonomie, 3/2003, 407-421.
445. Schwarz, J. (2007). Analýza investičních pobídekv České republice [Analysis of investment incentives in the Czech Republic]. Prague: University of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration.
446. Sedelmeier, U. (2001). Accommodation beyond self-interest? Identity, policy paradigms, and the limits of a rationalist approach to EU policy towards Central Europe. Politique Européenne, 3, 13-37.
447. Sedelmeier, U. and Wallace, H. (1996). Policies toward Central and Eastern Europe. In H. Wallace and W. Wallace (Eds.), Policy-making in the European Union (3rd edn, pp. 353-387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
448. Shafik, N. (1995). Making a market: Mass privatization in the Czech and Slovak republics. World Development, 23(7), 1143-1156.
449. Shields, S. (2001). Globalisation and Poland: Transnational social forces and the Polish transition to a market economy. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Wales, Aberystwyth.
450. Shields, S. (2003). The ‘charge of the right brigade’: Transnational social forces and the neoliberal configuration of Poland’s transition. New Political Economy, 8(2), 225-244.
451. Shields, S. (2004a). Global restructuring and the Polish state: Transition, transformation, or transnationalization? Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 132-154.
452. Shields, S. (2004b). Neoliberalisation through depoliticisation: Transnational governance and the political economy implications of eastwards enlargement of the EU. Paper presented at the Amsterdam Research Centre for Corporate Governance Regulation (ARCCGOR) Inaugural Workshop, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 17-18 December.
453. Siegel, R. L. and Weinberg, L. B. (1977). Comparing public policies: United States, Soviet Union and Europe. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
454. Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., and Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60, 781-810.
455. Simoneti, M., Rojec, M., and Rems, M. (2002). Ownership structure and post-privatisation performance and restructuring of the Slovenian non-financial corporate sector. Journal of East-West Business, 7(2), 7-37.
456. Sklair, L. (2001). The transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Blackwell.
457. Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3-37). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
458. Smith, A. (1998). Reconstructing the regional economy: Industrial transformation and regional development in Slovakia. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
459. Smith, A. (2002). Imagining geographies of the ‘new Europe’: Geo-economic power and the new European architecture of integration. Political Geography, 21, 647-670.
460. Smith, A. and Pavlínek, P. (2000). Inward investment, cohesion and the ‘wealth of regions’ in East-Central Europe. In J. Bachtler, R. Downes, and G. Gorzelak (Eds.), Transition, cohesion and regional policy in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 227-242). Aldershot: Ashgate.
461. Smith, A. and Pickles, J. (1998). Introduction: Theorising transition and the political economy of transformation. In J. Pickles and A. Smith (Eds.), Theorising transition: The political economy ofpost-communist transformations (pp. 1-22). London and New York: Routledge.
462. Smith, A., Rainnie, A., Dunford, M., Hardy, J., Hudson, R., and Sadler, D. (2002). Networks of value commodities and regions: Reworking divisions of labour in macro-regional economies. Progress in Human Geography, 26(1), 41-63.
463. Smith, G. (2004). Hegemony: Critical interpretations in anthropology and beyond. Focaal -European Journal of Anthropology, 43, 99-120.
464. Smith, N. (1993). Homeless/global: Scaling places. In J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson, and L. Tickner (Eds.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change (pp. 87-120). London: Routledge.
465. Smith, N. J.-A. (2005). Showcasting globalisation? The political economy of the Irish Republic. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
466. Soulsby, A. and Clark, E. (1996a). Economic restructuring and institutional change: Post-communist management in the Czech Republic. Journal of Socio-Economics, 25(4), 473-496.
467. Soulsby, A. and Clark, E. (1996b). The emergence of post-communist management in the Czech Republic. Organization Studies, 1996(17), 2.
468. Standing, G. and Vaughan-Whitehead, D. C. (1995). Minimum wages in Central and Eastern Europe: From protection to destitution. Budapest: Central European University Press.
469. Staniszkis, J. (1991). Political capitalism in Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 5, 127-141.
470. Stanojevic, M. (2003). Worker’s power in transition economies: The cases of Serbia and Slovenia. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(3), 283-301.
471. Stark, D. and Bruszt, L. (1998). Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
472. Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology: A review article. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), 170-186.
473. Stopford, J. M. and Strange, S. (1991). Rival states, rival firms: Competition for world market shares. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
474. Strange, S. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551-574.
475. Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter.
476. Strange, S. (1989). Towards a theory of transnational empire. In E.-O. Czempiel and J. N. Rosenau (Eds.), Global changes and theoretical challenges: Approaches for world politics for the 1990s (pp. 161-176). Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
477. Strange, S. (1991). Big business and the state. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(2), 245-250.
478. Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
479. Šulc, Z. (1990). Jak se zrodil západonĕmecký ‘hospodárský zázrak’ [How the West German ‘economic miracle’ was born]. Prague: Prace.
480. Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Camgridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
481. Swyngedouw, E. A. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137-166). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
482. Szacki, J. (1995). Liberalism after communism. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.
483. Szelényi, I. and Kováchs, I. (1998). 1997 Survey of management of leading Hungarian companies. Budapest: Institute of Political Science.
484. Sznajder, A. (2006). Effects of EU accession on the politics of privatization-The steel sector in comparative perspective. In A. Kutter and V. Trappmann (Eds.), Das Erbe des Beitritts: Europaisierung in Mittel-und Osteuropa. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
485. Sztompka, P. (1995). Cultural and civilizational change: The core of post-communist transition. In B. Grancelli (Ed.), Social change and modernization: Lessons from Eastern Europe (pp. 233-248). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
486. Teichova, A. (1988). The Czechoslovak economy, 1918-1980. London: Routledge.
487. Thacker, S. C. (2000). Big business, the state, and free trade: Constructing coalitions in Mexico. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
488. Thatcher, M. (2007). Internationalisation and economic institutions: Comparing European experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
489. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 269-404.
490. Tickell, A. and Peck, J. A. (2003). Making global rules: Globalisation or neoliberalisation? In J. A. Peck and H. Yeung (Eds.), Remaking the global economy (pp. 163-181). London: Sage.
491. Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
492. Tilly, C. and Goodin, R. E. (2006). It depends. In R. E. Goodin and C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 3-32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
493. Trník, M. (2007). The role of investment promotion agencies at attracting foreign direct investment and their impact on economic development in Central Europe (The Czech Republic and Slovakia in comparative perspective). Unpublished MA, Central European University, Budapest.
494. Turek, O. (1989). Podklad pro ‘ríjnový’ materiál PgÚ – úsek rozvíjení reformy [Background materials for October documents of IEF- economic reform development section]. Prague: Prognostický ústav Československé akademie vĕid [Institute of Economic Forecasting].
495. Turnock, D. (Ed.). (2004). Foreign direct investment and regional development in East Central Europe and the former Soviet Union: A collection of essays in memory of Professor Francis ‘Frank’ Carter. Aldershot: Ashgate.
496. Uitermark, J. (2002). Re-scaling, ‘scale fragmentation’ and the regulation of antagonistic relationships. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 743-765.
497. Uminski, S. (2001). Foreign capital in the privatization process of Poland. Transnational Corporations, 10(3), 75-94.
498. UNCTAD. (1993). World investment report. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
499. UNCTAD. (1995). World investment report: Transnational corporations and competitiveness. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
500. UNCTAD. (2001). The world of investment promotion at a glance: A survey of investment promotion practices. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
501. UNCTAD. (2002). World investment report: Transnational corporations and export competitiveness. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
502. UNCTAD. (2004). World investment report: The shift towards services. New York and Geneva United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
503. UNCTAD. (2005). World investment report: Transnational corporations and the internationalization of RandD. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
504. UNCTAD. (2006). World investment report: FDI from developing and transition economies: Implications for development. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
505. UNICEF. (1997). Children at risk in Central and Eastern Europe: Perils and promises (Economies in transition studies regional monitoring report No. 4). Florence: UNICEF.
506. Vachudova, M. A. (2001). The Czech Republic: The unexpected force of institutional constraints. In J. Zielonka and A. Pravda (Eds.), Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe: International and transnational factors (pp. 325-362). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
507. van Apeldoorn, B. (2002). Transnational capitalism and the struggle over European integration. London and New York: Routledge.
508. van Apeldoorn, B. (2004). Theorizing the transnational: A historical materialist approach. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(2), 142-176.
509. van der Pijl, K. (1984). The making of an Atlantic ruling class. London: Verso.
510. van der Pijl, K. (1989). Ruling classes, hegemony, and the state system: Theoretical and historical considerations. International Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 7-35.
511. van der Pijl, K. (1998). Transnational classes and international relations. London and New York: Routledge.
512. van der Pijl, K. (2001). What happened to the European option for Eastern Europe? In A. Bieler and A. D. Morton (Eds.), Social forces in the making of the new Europe (pp. 185-204). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
513. van der Pijl, K. (2004). Two faces of the transnational cadre under neo-liberalism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(2), 177-207.
514. van der Pijl, K. (2006). Global rivalries: From the Cold War to Iraq. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
515. Vanhuysse, P. (2006). Divide and pacify: Strategic social policies and political protests in post-communist democracies. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.
516. Vaughan-Whitehead, D. C. (2003). EU enlargement versus social Europe? The uncertain future of the European social model. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
517. Večerník, J. (1996). Markets and people: The Czech reform experience in a comparative perspective. Aldershot: Avebury.
518. Večerník, J. (1997). The middle classes and Czech reforms: A survey of the interplay between socio-economic policies and social stratification. SOCO Project Paper, 53. Vienna: Institute for Human Sciences.
519. Večerník, J. (1998a). Transformation in a socio-economic perspective. Prague Economic Papers, 7,251-262.
520. Večerník, J. (Ed.). (1998b). Zpráva o vývoji české společnosti 1989-1998 [Social report of the Czech Republic in 1989-1998]. Prague: Academia.
521. Vernon, R. (1998). In the hurricane’s eye: The troubled prospects of multinational enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
522. Vliegenthart, A. (2008). Transnational actors and corporate governance in ECE: The case of the EU and the Czech Republic. In J. Pickles and R. M. Jenkins (Eds.), State and society in post-socialist economies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
523. Vliegenthart, A. and Horn, L. (2007). The role of the EU in the (trans)formation of corporate governance regulation in Central Eastern Europe-The case of the Czech Republic. Competition and Change, 11 (2), 137-154.
524. Vliegenthart, A. and Overbeek, H. (2007). The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation. In H. Overbeek, B. van Apeldoorn, and A. Nolke (Eds.), The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation (pp. 177-197). London: Routledge.
525. Vogel, D. (1995). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
526. Voszka, É. (1995). Centralization, re-nationalization, and redistribution: Government’s role in changing Hungary’s ownership structure. In J. Hausner, B. Jessop, and K. Nielsen (Eds.), Strategic choice and path-dependency in post-socialism: Institutional dynamics in the transformation process (pp. 287-308). Aldershot and Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
527. Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
528. Vychodil, O. (2005). Dopady postprivatizační koncentrace vlastnictví na vykonnost českých podniků [The impact of post-privatization concentration of ownership on the performance of Czech firms]. In K. Kouba, O. Vychodil, and J. Roberts (Eds.), Privatizace bez kapitálu: Zvýšené naklady české transformace [Privatization without capital: Elevated costs of the Czech transformation] (pp. 79-135). Prague: Karolinum.
529. Wapner, P. (1995). Politics beyond the state. World Politics, 47, 311-340.
530. Watson, M. and Hay, C. (2003). The discourse of globalisation and the logic of no alternative: Rendering the contingent necessary in the political economy of New Labour. Policy and Politics, 31(3), 289-305.
531. WB. (1995). Understanding poverty in Poland. Washington, DC: World Bank.
532. WB. (1996). World Bank world development report 1996: From plan to market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
533. WB. (2003). Developmental indicators [CD-Rom]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
534. WB. (2005). World business environment survey 2000 webtool interactive. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/govemance/wbes/.
535. WB and EBRD. (2005). Business environment and enterprise performance survey dataset. Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/beeps/.
536. Wedel, J. R. (1998). Collision and collusion: The strange case of Western aid to Eastern Europe, 1989-1998 (1st edn). New York: St Martin’s Press.
537. Weir, M. and Skocpol, T. (1985). State structures and the possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain, and the United States. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 107-163). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
538. Weiss, L. (2003a). Introduction: Bringing domestic institutions back in. In L. Weiss (Ed.), States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in (pp. 1-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
539. Weiss, L. (Ed.). (2003b). States in the global economy: Bringing domestic institutions back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
540. Williams, A. M. and Balaz, V. (1999). Privatisation in Central Europe: Different legacies, methods, and outcomes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 17, 731-751.
541. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
542. Williamson, J. (1993). Democracy and the ‘Washington Consensus’. World Development, 21(8), 1329-1336.
543. Winship, C. and Mandel, M. (1984). Roles and positions: A critique and extension of the blockmodeling approach. Sociological Methodology, 14, 314-344.
544. Wolf, E. R. (1982). Europe and the people without history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
545. Wolf, E. R. (1990). Facing power-old insights, new questions. American Anthropologist, 92(3), 586-596.
546. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
547. Young, C. (2004). Place marketing for foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern Europe. In D. Turnock (Ed.), Foreign direct investment and regional development in East Central Europe and the former Soviet Union: A collection of essays in memory of Professor Francis ‘Frank’ Carter (pp. 103-121). Aldershot: Ashgate.
548. Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S. (1999). Changing perception of the post-socialist city: Place promotion and imagery in Lodz, Poland. Geographical Journal, 165(2), 183-191.
549. Young, C. and Kaczmarek, S. (2000). Local government, local economic development and quality of life in Poland. GeoJournal, 50, 225-234.
550. Zahradník, P. and Jedlička, J. (2006). Předpokládaný vlivprojektu Hyundai Motor Company na českou ekonomiku [Expected impact of the Hyundai Motor Company project on the Czech economy]. Prague: Commissioned by CzechInvest.
551. Žák, V. (1997). Křižovatky nasí privatizace [Crossroads of our privatization]. Listy, 27(3), 13-22.
552. Zamkovský, J. (1999). Ako sa loví plachá zver pod Tatrami: Prípad BMW [Hunting shy animals under the Tatras: The case of BMW]. Poniky: Friends of the Earth-CEPA.
553. Zamkovsky, J. (2001). Globalizácia a Slovensko: Prípad vládneho Programu rozvoja automobilového priemyslu [Globalization and Slovakia: The case of the governmental programme for support of the automotive industry]. Poniky: Friends of the Earth-CEPA.
554. Zeman, M. (2006). Vzestup a pád české sociálni demokracie [The rise and the fall of Czech social democracy]. Prague: Andrej Štastný.
555. Žižalová, P. (2008) TPCA case study. Brno: Economy and Society Trust. Available at: www.thinktank.cz/fdi.