Group creativity and the stages of creative problem solving

The Scope of Social Psychology: Theory and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 159-172

  Nijstad, Bernard A ^a   Levine, John M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917120414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203965245     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Bartis, S., Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. (1988). Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 242-251.
3. Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
4. Choi, H. S., & Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
5. Choi, H. S., & Thompson, L. L. (2006). Membership change in groups: Implications for group creativity. In L. L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 87-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
7. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
8. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
9. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
10. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722-735.
11. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles: Friendship dynamics and creative work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Faure, C. (2004). Beyond brainstorming: Effects of different group procedures on selection of ideas and satisfaction with the process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 13-34.
15. Gallupe, R. B., Bastianutti, L. M., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
16. Getzels, J. W. (1982). The problem of the problem. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Question framing and response consistency (pp. 37-49). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
18. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56-71.
20. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on a task requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 362-388.
21. LeBon, G. (1895). The crowd. London: Unwin.
22. Levine, J. M., & Choi, H. S., (2004). Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 153-176). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23. Levine, J. M., Choi, H. S., & Moreland, R. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation In work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2004). Collaboration: The social context of theory development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 164-172.
25. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449-460). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). Problem identification by groups. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 17-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-24.
29. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. G. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
30. Nijstad, B. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Four principles of group creativity. In L. L. Thompson & H. S. Choi (Eds.), Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 161-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
31. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (1999). Persistence of brainstorming groups: How do people know when to stop? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 165-185.
32. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535-544.
33. Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 531-548.
34. Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: The determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination (first edition). New York: Scribner.
36. Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination (third edition). New York: Scribner.
37. Parnes, S. J. (Ed.). (1992). Sourcebook for creative problem solving: A fifty-year digest of proven innovation processes. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.
38. Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicting production gains and losses. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 299-325). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
39. Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
41. Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2003). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules, and decision making. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Arlington, USA.
42. Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., O'Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9-23.
43. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2005). The selection of creative ideas after brainstorming: Overcoming the bias against originality. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
44. Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 244-251.
45. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. Simonton, D. K. (2004). Group artistic creativity: Creative clusters and cinematic success in feature films. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1494-1520.
48. Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 271-303). London: Wiley.
49. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.
50. Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23-47.
51. Thompson, L. L., & Choi, H. S. (Eds.). (2006). Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
52. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-387.