Membership change in groups: Implications for group creativity

Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 87-107

  Choi, Hoon Seok ^a   Thompson, Leigh L ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49449090105     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410615732     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 47, 905-917.
2. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
3. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1998). Rethinking team composition from the outside in. In M. Neale & E. Mannix (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 21-38). Stamford, CT: JAI.
4. Argote, L. (1999). Learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Kluwer Academic.
5. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
6. Argote, L., Insko, C. A., Yovetich, N., & Romero, A. A. (1995). Group learning curves: The effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 512-529.
7. Argote, L., & Kane, A. (2003). Learning from direct and indirect organizations: The effects of experience content, timing, and distribution. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 277-303). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Membership matters: How member change and continuity affect group structure, process, and performance. Small Group Research, 24, 334-361.
9. Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
10. Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866-878.
11. Bauer, T. N., Morrison, E. W., & Callister, R. R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16, 149-214.
12. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 209-231.
13. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
14. Brown, J. (2002, March 18). Prada gets personal. BusinessWeek, p. EB8.
15. Campbell, D. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
16. Choi, H.-S., & Levine, J. M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: Impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
17. Choi, H.-S., & Thompson, L. (2003). Old wine in a new bottle: Brainstorming in open and closed groups. Working paper, Kellogg School of Management.
18. Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
19. Dalton, D. R., & Todor, W. D. (1979). Turnover turned over: An expanded and positive perspective. Academy of Management Review, 4, 225-235.
20. Devadas, R., & Argote, L. (1995, May). Collective learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and group structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
21. Feldman, D. C. (1994). Who's socializing whom? The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders, work groups, and organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 4, 213-233.
22. Galbraith, C. S. (1990). Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high technology firms. California Management Review, 32(4), 56-70.
23. George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
24. Gersick, C. J. G., & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 65-97.
25. Goodman, P. S., & Leyden, D. P. (1991). Familiarity and group productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 578-586.
26. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Fan, E. T. (1999). What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., & Fan, E. (2000). What do groups learn from their worldliest members?: Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 45-59.
28. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. Intelligence, 1, 274-280.
29. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
30. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, D. M., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
32. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 383-396). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
34. Kao, J. (1996). Jamming: The art and discipline of corporate creativity. New York: HarperBusiness.
35. Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 81-104.
36. Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. New York: Doubleday.
37. Kelly, J. R. (1988). Entrainment in individual and group performance. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 89-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Kelly, J. R., & Karau, S. (1993). Entrainment of creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 24, 179-198.
39. Kim, P. H. (1997). When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 165-177.
40. Klimoski, R. J., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental models: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403-437.
41. LePine, J. A. (2003). Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 27-39.
42. Levine, J. M., & Choi, H.-S. (2004). Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Process and performance at the inter/ intra individual level (pp. 163-176). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
43. Levine, J. M., Choi, H.-S., & Moreland, R. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 202-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
44. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Innovation and socialization in small groups. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 143-169). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Culture and socialization in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasdale (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 257-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
46. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-336). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
47. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 415-469). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
48. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R. L., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
49. Mathiyalakan, S. (2002). A methodology for controlled empirical investigation of membership continuity and change in GDSS groups. Decision Support Systems, 32(3), 279-295.
50. McGrath, J. E. (1998). A view of group composition through a group-theoretic lens. In M. Neale, E. Mannix, & D. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Composition (Vol. 1, pp. 255-272). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
51. McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.
52. Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in workgroups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Monahan, T. (2002). The do it yourself lobotomy: Open your mind to greater creative thinking. New York: Wiley.
55. Moreland, R. L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of "new" group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1190.
56. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1998). Training people to work in groups. In R. S. Tindale & Colleagues (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 37-60). New York: Plenum.
58. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual- group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
59. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and oldtimers in small groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
60. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
61. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2003). Group composition: Explaining similarities and differences among group members. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 367-380). London: Sage.
62. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In J. Davis & E. Witte (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
64. Moscovici, S., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Maass, A. (Eds.). (1994). Minority influence. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
65. Naylor, J. C., & Briggs, G. E. (1965). Team-training effectiveness under various conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 223-229.
66. Neale, M., Mannix, E., & Gruenfeld, D. (Eds.). (1998). Research on managing groups and teams: Composition (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
67. Nemeth, C. J. (1992). Minority dissent as a stimulant to group performance. In S. P. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. L. Simpson (Eds.), Productivity and process in groups (pp. 95-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68. Nemeth, C. J., & Owens, P. D. (1996). Making groups more effective: The value of minority dissent. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 125-141). England: Wiley.
69. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York: Scribner.
70. Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., & Dzindolet, M. T. (2001). Creativity in groups and teams. In M. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 319-338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76-87.
72. Price, J. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
73. Rogelberg, S. G., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Lowe, C. A. (1992). The stepladder technique: An alternative group structure facilitating effective group decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 730-737.
74. Rogelberg, S. G., & O'Connor, M. S. (1998). Extending the stepladder technique: An examination of self-paced stepladder groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(2), 82-91.
75. Rogelberg, S. G., O'Connor, M. S., & Sederburg, M. (2002). Using the stepladder technique to facilitate the performance of audioconferencing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 994-1000.
76. Rogers, M. S., Ford, J. D., & Tassone, J. A. (1961). The effects of personnel replacement on an information-processing crew. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 91-96.
77. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). Special issue preface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 87-88.
78. Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcome: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 779-802.
79. Staw, B. M. (1980). Rationality and justification in organizational life. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 45-80). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
80. Stein, M. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-322.
81. Sundstrom, E. (1999). Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
82. Sutton, R. I. (2002). Weird ideas that work: 111/2 ideas for promoting, managing and sustaining motivation. New York: The Free Press.
83. Sutton, R. I., & Louis, M. R. (1987). How selecting and socializing newcomers influences insiders. Human Resource Management, 26, 347-362.
84. Swift, T. A., & West, M. A. (1998). Reflexivity and group process: Research and practice. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sheffield.
85. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43.
86. Thompson, L. (2003). Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 96-109.
87. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278-302.
88. Torrance, E. P. (1955). Some consequences of power differences on decision making in permanent and temporary three-man groups. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups (pp. 482-492). New York: Knopf.
89. Trow, D. B. (1960). Membership succession and team performance. Human Relations, 13, 259-269.
90. Wanous, J. P., & Colella, A. (1989). Organizational entry research: Current status and future directions. In G. R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human research management (Vol. 7, pp. 59-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
91. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelson, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590-602.
92. Weiss, H. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (1985). Routinized behavior in organizations. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 14, 57-67.
93. West, M. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of workgroup psychology (pp. 555-579). Chichester: Wiley.
94. West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1-29). Stamford, CT: JAI.
95. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
96. Ziller, R. C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 164-182.
97. Ziller, R. C., Behringer, R. D., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1962). Group creativity under conditions of success or failure and variations in group stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 43-49.