Towards highly communicative e-learning communities: Developing a socio-cultural framework for cognitive change

Education in Cyberspace

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 130-145

  Ravenscroft, Andrew ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917067054     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203391068     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M. and Simon, H.A. (1996) ‘Situated learning and education’, Educational Researcher, 25(4): 5-11.
2. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R. and Traum, D. (1999) ‘The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks’, in Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Computational and Cognitive Approaches, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 31-63.
3. Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory, London: Prentice Hall.
4. Burton, M., Brna, P. and Pilkington, R. (2000) ‘Clarissa: a laboratory for the modelling of collaboration’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11: 79-105.
5. Cooper, B. (2003) ‘Care – making the affective leap: more than a concerned interest in a learner's cognitive abilities’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 13(1): 3-9.
6. Damasio, A. (1999) The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness, London: Vintage.
7. De Vincente, A., Bouwer, A. and Pain, H. (1999) ‘Initial impressions on using the discount scheme’, in Pilkington, R., McKendree, J., Pain, H. and Brna, P. (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on Analysing Educational Dialogue Interaction. Workshop at 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18th-19th July, 1999, Le Mans, France: University of Le Mans, 87-94.
8. Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H. and Lowyck, J. (eds) (1993) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, Berlin: Springer.
9. Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theory Approach to Developmental Research, Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
10. Fosnot, C. (1996) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice, New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Gibson, J.J. (1977) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Issroff, K. and Scanlon, E. (2001) ‘Case studies revisited: what can activity theory offer?’ Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2001 (Cscl 2001), Maastricht, Netherlands, 22-24 March, 316-323.
13. Jonassen, D.H., Mayes, T. and McAleese, R. (1993) ‘A manifesto for a constructivist approach to technology in higher education’, in Duffy, T.M., Jonassen, D.H. and Lowyck, J. (eds) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, Berlin: Springer, pp. 231-247.
14. Kirschner, P.A. (2002) ‘Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning,’ in Kirschner, P.A. (ed.) Three Worlds of CSCL: Can We Support CSCL?, Nederland: Open Universitiet, pp. 7-47.
15. Knutti, K. (1996) ‘Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research’, in Nardi, B. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 17-44.
16. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lewis, R. (1997) ‘An activity theory framework to explore distributed communities’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13: 210-218.
18. MacKenzie, J.D. (1979) ‘Question-begging in non-cumulative systems’, Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 117-133.
19. McAlister, S. (2001) Argumentation and Design for Learning, Dialogue and Design Research Group Technical Report DDRG-01-2, Institute of Educational Technology, Open University, Milton Keynes.
20. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A. and Scanlon, E. (2003) ‘Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation in education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning: Special Issue: Developing Dialogue for Learning, 20(3): 194-204.
21. McConnell, D. (2000) Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, London: Kogan Page.
22. Maudet, N. and Evrard, F. (1998) ‘A generic framework for dialogue game implementation’, in Hulstijn, J. and Nijholt, A. (eds) Second Workshop on Formal Semantic and Pragmatics of Dialogue (TWLT13), May 13-15, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
23. Maudet, N. and Moore, D.J. (2000) ‘Dialogue games as dialogue models for interacting with, and via, computers’, submitted to Informal Logic, 13(3).
24. Moore, D.J. (2000) ‘A framework for using multimedia within argumentation systems’, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9: 83-98.
25. Moore, D.J. (1993) Dialogue Game Theory for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
26. Moore, D.J. and Hobbs, D.J. (1996) ‘Computational use of philosophical dialogue theories’, Informal Logic, 18: 131-163.
27. Nardi, B. (1996) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Norman, D.A. (1986) ‘Cognitive engineering’, in Norman, D.A. and Draper, S. (eds) User-Centred Systems Design, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Pea, R. and Seely-Brown, J. (1993) in Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii-viii.
30. Pilkington, R.M. (1999) Analysing Educational Discourse: The DISCOUNT Scheme, Version 3, January, CBL Technical Report No. 99/2.
31. Pilkington, R.M. (1992) Intelligent Help: Communicating with Knowledge Based Systems, London: Paul Chapman.
32. Pilkington, R. and Grierson, A. (1996) ‘Generating explanations in a simulation based learning environment’, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45: 527-551.
33. Pilkington, R.M., Hartley, J.R., Hintze, D. and Moore, D. (1992) ‘Learning to argue and arguing to learn: an interface for computer-based dialogue games’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 3: 275-285.
34. Pilkington, R.M., Treasure-Jones, T. and Kneser, C. (1999) ‘Educational chat: using exchange structure analysis to investigate communicative roles in CMC seminars’, in Brna, P., Baker, M. and Stenning, K. (eds) Roles of Communicative Interaction in Learning to Model in Mathematics and Science: Proceedings of CLEMMAS TMR Conference, 15-19 April, Ajaccio, Corsica, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds, UK.
35. Preece, J. (2000) Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability, John Wiley Ltd.
36. Ravenscroft, A. (2004) ‘From conditioning to learning communities: implications of 50 years of research in e-learning interaction design’, Association for Learning Technology Journal, 11(3): 4-18.
37. Ravenscroft, A. (2002) ‘Communities, communication and cognitive change: social processes and designing engaging e-learning discourse’, in Driscoll, M. and Reeves, T.C. (eds) Proceedings of E-Learn 2002, Norfolk, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 792-797.
38. Ravenscroft, A. (2001) ‘Designing e-learning interactions in 21C: revisiting and rethinking the role of theory’, European Journal of Education: Special Edition on On-Line Learning, 36(2): 133-156.
39. Ravenscroft, A. (2000) ‘Designing argumentation for conceptual development’, Computers and Education, 34: 241-255.
40. Ravenscroft, A. and Matheson, M.P. (2002) ‘Developing and evaluating dialogue games for collaborative e-learning interaction’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Special Issue: Context, Collaboration, Computers and Learning, 18(1): 93-102.
41. Ravenscroft, A. and Pilkington, R.M. (2000) ‘Investigation by design: developing dialogue models to support reasoning and conceptual change’, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11: 273-298.
42. Ravenscroft, A., Hutchinson, A., Baur, E. and Bradley, C. (2002) ‘Mocca framework: maxims for developing online communities and communication using affordances’, LTRI Technical Report – June 2002, London: London Metropolitan University.
43. Salmon, G. (2000) E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online, London: Kogan Page.
44. Seely-Brown, J., Collins, A. and Duguid, P. (1989) ‘Situated cognition and the culture of learning’, Educational Researcher, January: 32-41.
45. Tolmie, A. and Boyle, J. (2000) ‘Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study’, Computers and Education, 34: 119-140.
46. Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Walton, D. (1984) Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies (published thesis), Lanham, MD: University Press America.
48. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. and Snyder, W.M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.