Defining 'successful' environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 151-169

  Moore, Susan A ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT RESOLUTION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING;

AUSTRALIA; USA;

AUSTRALIA; ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION; PUBLIC LAND PLANNING; UNITED STATES;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; LAND USE; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 0030131602     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0195-9255(96)00048-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Babbie, E. 1983. The Practice of Social Research, Belmont: Wadsworth.
2. Bingham, G. 1986. Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience, Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
3. Buckle, L. G., and Thomas-Buckle, S. R. 1986. Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from "failed" mediations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 6:55-70.
4. Crowfoot, J. E., and Wondolleck, J. M. 1990. Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution, Washington, DC: Island.
5. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., and Nachmias, D. 1992. Research Methods in the Social Sciences, New York: St Martins.
6. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine.
7. Lane, R. E. 1986. Market justice, political justice. American Political Science Review 80:383-402.
8. Mangin, R., and Steger, M. A. 1990. The T/F/W environmental policy negotiations of Washington State. In Conflict Resolution and Public Policy, M. K. Mills (ed.). Westport: Greenwood.
9. Manning, P.K. 1991. Analytic induction. In Symbolic Interactionism, Vol. 1: Foundations and History, K. Plummer (ed.). Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
10. Moore, S.A. 1994. Interaction processes and the resolution of environmental disputes: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Doctoral dissertation. Seattle: University of Washington.
11. Moore. S.A. 1995. The role of trust in social networks: Formation, function, and fragility. In Nature Conservation 4: The Role of Networks, D.A. Saunders, J. Craig, and E.M. Mattiske (eds.). Chipping Norton, New South Wales: Surrey Beatty and Sons.
12. Moore, S.A., and Lee, R.G. Submitted. Doing things together: A descriptive, staged model of environmental dispute resolution. Journal of Society and Natural Resources.
13. Rein, M., and Rabinovitz, F.F. 1977. Implementation: A theoretical perspective. Joint Center for Urban Studies-MIT and Harvard University, unpublished report.
14. Sabatier, P., and Mazmanian, D. 1979. The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis 5:481-504.
15. Stokes, G.L. 1991. New wildland recreation strategies: The Flathead experience. Western Wildlands 1991(Winter):23-27.
16. Susskind, L., and Ozawa, C. 1983. Mediated negotiation in the public sector: Mediator accountability and the public interest problem. American Behavioral Scientist 27:255-279.
17. Syme, G.J., Macpherson, D.K., and Fry, P. 1987. Public involvement and environmental planning in Western Australia. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 4:310-321.
18. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., and Renn, O. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15:443-463.
19. Weick, K.W. 1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading: Addison-Wesley.
20. Wondolleck, J.M., and Yaffee, S.L. 1994. Building bridges across agency boundaries: In search of excellence in the USFS. A research report submitted to the USDA-Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, in fulfillment of USDA Forest Service Cooperative Agreement #PNW 92-0215. Ann Arbor: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Michigan.