International law and international relations theory: A prospectus

The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Theoretical Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 16-49

  Slaughter, Anne Marie ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916962367     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494147.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (121)

1. Gary King, Robert O.Keohane, and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry(1994), p. 28.
2. Richard K. Ashley, “The Poverty of Neorealism” in R. Keohane, Neorealism and its Critics (2nd ed., 1986), p. 281.
3. Anthony Clark Arend, Legal Rules and International Society(Oxford University Press, New York, 1999), p. 89.
4. Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner (eds.), “International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study ofWorld Politics” (1998) 52 International Organization 1.
5. Benjamin J. Cohen and Charles Lipson, Issues and Agents in International Political Economy(1999).
6. John Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutions” (1995) 19 International Security 5.
7. JeffreyW. Legro and Andrew Moravcsik, “Is Anybody Still a Realist?” (1999) 24 International Security 5.
8. David A. Baldwin (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: TheContemporaryDebate(1993).
9. Charles W.Kegley, Jr. (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge(1995).
10. Robert J. Beck, Anthony Clark Arend and Robert D. Vanderlugt, International Rules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations(1996).
11. Janna Thompson, Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Inquiry (1992).
12. Benedict Kingsbury, “The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law” (1998) 19 Michigan J. Int’l L. 345, 369-72.
13. Evan Luard, Conflict andPeace in theModernInternational System(1988).
14. Klaus Stegemann, “Policy Rivalry Among Industrial States: What Can We Learn fromModels of Strategic Trade Policy?” (1989) 41 International Organization 73.
15. KennethW. Abbott, “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers” (1989) 14 Yale J. Int’l L. 335.
16. Anne-Marie Slaughter Burley, “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda” (1993) 87 Am. J. Int’l L. 205-208.
17. Stephan Haggard and Beth A. Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes” (1987) 41 International Organization 491.
18. Thucydides, T. History of the Peloponnesian War (Rex Warner (trans.), 1986).
19. Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince (1946).
20. Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (1948), p. 244.
21. Michael Joseph Smith, Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (1986), p. 219.
22. F. S. Northedge, The Use of Force in International Relations(1974), pp. 213-15.
23. Smith, S. Realist Thought, p. 221.
24. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651), p. 107.
25. Smith, S. Realist Thought, p. 13.
26. W.Michael Reisman and Andrew R.Willard (eds.), International Incidents: The Law That Counts inWorld Politics 5 (1988).
27. Smith, S. Realist Thought, p. 1.
28. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (1979), p. 91.
29. Mearsheimer, M. “False Promise,” p. 11.
30. Stanley Hoffmann, “The Politics and Ethics of Military Intervention Survival” (1995-96) 37 IISS Quarterly 29, 33-34.
31. Slaughter Burley, International Law, p. 207.
32. Harold HongjuKoh, “WhyDoNations Obey International Law?” (1997) 106 Yale L. J. 2599, 2607-8.
33. Arnold Wolfers, Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics (1962), p. 19.
34. W. Michael Reisman, “Lassa Oppenheim’s Nine Lives” (1994) 19 Yale J. Int’l L. 255
35. S.R. Jennings and S.A. Watts, Oppenheim’s International Law (1992).
36. David Kennedy, “The International Style in Postwar Law and Policy” (1994) Utah L. Rev. 7-36.
37. Martti Koskenniemi, FromApology toUtopia: The Structure of International LegalArgument (1989), p. 5.
38. Stephen D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (1983), p. 2.
39. Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in theWorld Political Economy(1984), p. 244.
40. Robert O. Keohane, International Institutions and State Power(1989).
41. Oran Young, International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment (1989).
42. John G. Ruggie, “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends” (1975) 29 International Organization 557-570.
43. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition (1977), p. 19.
44. Volker Rittenberger (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations (1993), pp. 3-11.
45. Keohane, K. After Hegemony, p. 245.
46. Friedrich Kratochwil, RulesNorms, andDecisions (1989), p. 187.
47. Robert Jervis, “Security Regimes” in Krasner, International Regimes, pp. 173-94.
48. Jervis, J. SecurityRegimes, 173-94.
49. Kenneth Oye (ed.), CooperationUnderAnarchy(1986).
50. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (1984).
51. Peter J.Katzenstein, Robert O.Keohane and Stephen D.Krasner (eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics (1998), p. 23.
52. Keohane, K. International Institutions, p. 33.
53. Hedley Bull, “Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations” (1972) 2 British J. Int’lStudies101, 104-5.
54. Anne-Marie Slaughter, “The Liberal Agenda for Peace: International Relations Theory and the Future of the United Nations” (1994) 4 Transnational Law and ContemporaryProblems377.
55. Andrew Moravcsik, “The Liberal Paradigmin International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment” in Colin and Miram Fendius Elman (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003).
56. Michael Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (1997).
57. Andrew Moravcsik, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics” (1997) 51 International Organization 513-514.
58. David Fidler, “Caught Between Traditions: The Security Council in Philosophical Conundrum” (1996) 17 Michigan J. Int’l L. 411, 443-46.
59. Thomas Risse-Kappen, “Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War” (1994) 48 International Organization 185.
60. Robert O. Keohane, “International Liberalism Reconsidered” in J. Dunn (ed.), The Economic Limits toModernPolitics155 (1990).
61. Joseph S.Nye, “Neorealism andNeoliberalism” (1988) 40 World Politics 235.
62. Moravcsik, M. “Taking Preferences Seriously,” 516-21.
63. Anne-Marie Slaughter, “Liberal Theory of International Law” (2000) 240 Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Societyof International Law, April 5-8, 2000.
64. Moravcsik, M. “TakingPreferences Seriously,” 518.
65. James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders” in Katzenstein, Keohane and Krasner, Exploration and Contestation, pp. 309-12.
66. Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change” (1998) 52 International Organization 887, reprinted in Katzenstein, Keohane and Krasner, Exploration and Contestation, pp. 274-75.
67. March, M. And Olsen, O. Institutional Dynamics, 312.
68. Robert O. Keohane, “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics” (1997) 38 Harvard Int’l L. J. 487.
69. Abram Chayes and AntoniaHandler Chayes, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (1995), pp. 27-28.
70. Peter J. Katzenstein, Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner, “Preface: International Organization at Its Golden Anniversary” in Katzenstein, Keohane and Krasner, Exploration and Contestation, pp. 34-36.
71. John Gerard Ruggie, “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge” (1998) 52 International Organization 185.
72. Finnemore, F. And Sikkink, S. “International Norm Dynamics,” 272-73.
73. Alexander Wendt, “Constructing International Politics” (1994-95) 19 J. Int’l Security 5.
74. Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy isWhat States Make of It” (1992) 46 International Organization 391, reprinted in Charles Lipson and Benjamin Cohen (eds.), Theory and Structure in International Political Economy: An International Organization
75. Reader(1999), p. 79.
76. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (1999), p. 7.
77. Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security (1996), p. 46.
78. Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds.), Security Communities (1998).
79. Michael N. Barnett, Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order(1998).
80. Wendt, J. Social Theory, pp. 22, 34-35.
81. Wendt, J. “Constructing International Politics,” 8.
82. Ruggie, R. “What Makes the World,” 216.
83. Wendt, J. “Anarchy”, 79.
84. Finnemore, R. And Sikkink, S. “International Norm Dynamics,” 274-75.
85. Andrew Hurrell, “International Society and the Study of Regimes: A Reflective Approach” in Robert J. Beck, Anthony Clark Arend and Robert D. Vander Lugt (eds.), InternationalRules: Approaches from International Law and International Relations(1999), pp. 206-24.
86. Stephen D. Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy(2000), pp. 56-67.
87. Moravcsik, M. “Taking Preferences Seriously,” 524-33.
88. Richard H. Steinberg (ed.), The Greening of Trade Law? International Trade Organizations and Environmental Issues (2000), p. 8.
89. George W. Downs, David M. Rocke and Peter N.Barsoom, “Is theGoodNewsAboutComplianceGoodNewsAboutCooperation?” (1996) 50 International Organization 379.
90. Tom J. Farer, “An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention” in Lori Fisler Damrosch and David J. Scheffer (eds.), Law and Force in the New InternationalOrder196 (1991).
91. Anthony Arend, “Do Legal Rules Matter? International Law and International Politics” (1998) 38 Virginia J. Int’l L. 107.
92. Michael Byers, “Taking the Law out of International Law: A Critique of the Iterative Perspective” (1997) 38 Harvard Int’l L. J. 201-205.
93. Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O.Keohane and Anne-Marie Slaughter, “Introduction: Legalization andWorld Politics” (2000) 54 International Organization 385-387.
94. Alec Stone Sweet, Governingwith Judges:Constitutional Politics in Europe (2000), p. 11.
95. Alec Stone, The Birth of Judicial Politics in France (1992).
96. Alec Stone Sweet, “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance” (1999) 32 Comparative Political Studies 147.
97. Alec Stone Sweet, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (2000).
98. Dinah Shelton (ed.), Commitment andCompliance: TheRole ofNon-BindingNorms in the International Legal System(2000).
99. Naomi Roht-Arriaza, “‘Soft Law’ in a ‘Hybrid’ Organization: The International Organization for Standardization” (p. 263).
100. Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, “Policy Guidance and Compliance: The World Bank Operational Standards” (p. 281).
101. Lyuba Zarsky, “Environmental Norms in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum” (p. 303).
102. Kenneth Abbott and Duncan Snidal, “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance” (2000) 54 International Organization 421.
103. P. Dupuy, “Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment” (1991) 12 Michigan J. Int’l L. 420.
104. Antonio Cassese and Joseph H.H. Weiler (eds.), Change and Stability in International Law-Making(1988).
105. Oscar Schachter, “The Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements” (1977) 71 Am. J. Int’l L. 296.
106. Prosper Weil, “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law?” (1983) 77 Am. J. Int’l L. 413.
107. Ved P. Nanda, “Development as an Emerging Human Right under International Law” (1996) 13 Denver J. Int’l L. And Policy 161.
108. Jutta Brunnee and Stephen Toope, “Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: A Case for International Ecosystem Law” (1994) 5 Yearbook of Int’l Environmental Law 41.
109. Jutta Brunnee and Stephen Toope, “Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: EcosystemRegimeBuilding” (1997) 91 Am. J. Of Int’l L. 6.
110. Stephen Toope and Jutta Brunnee, “Freshwater Regimes: The Mandate of the International Joint Commission” (1998) 15 Arizona J. Int’l and Comparative L. 273.
111. Charles Lipson, “Why Are Some Agreements Informal?” (1991) 45 International Organization 495.
112. Kenneth W. Abbott, “The Trading Nation’s Dilemma: The Functions of the Law of International Trade” (1985) 26 Harvard Int’l L. J. 501.
113. Kenneth W. Abbott, “‘Trust But Verify’: The Production of Information in Arms Control Treaties and Other International Agreements” (1993) 26 Cornell Int’l L. J. 1-2.
114. Kenneth W. Abbott and Duncan Snidal, “Why States Act Through Formal International Organizations” (1998) 42 J. Conflict Resolution 3.
115. Anne-Marie Slaughter, Andrew S. Tulumello and Stepan Wood, “International Law and International Relations Theory: A NewGeneration of Interdisciplinary Scholarship” (1998) 92 Am. J. Int’l L. 376 (1998).
116. Ronald B.Mitchell, “Situation Structure andRegime ImplementationMechanisms,” paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, September 1999.
117. John G. Ruggie, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order” (1982) 36 International Organization 379.
118. Ronald B.Mitchell, Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance (1994), pp. 299-300.
119. Abbott, A. And Snidal, S. “Hard and Soft Law,” 450.
120. Miles Kahler, “Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization” (2000) 54 InternationalOrganization661, 675-76.
121. Beth A. Simmons, “The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs” (2000) 54 International Organization 573-599.