A framework for collecting inclusive design data for the UK population

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 46, Issue PB, 2015, Pages 318-324

  Langdon, Pat ^a   Johnson, Daniel ^b   Huppert, Felicia ^c   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Capability measurement; Design for all; Disability; Disability survey; Inclusive design

Indexed keywords

POPULATION STATISTICS; SURVEYS;

DESIGN FOR ALL; DISABILITY; ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS; HETEROGENEOUS USERS; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; INCLUSIVE PRODUCT DESIGNS; RECENT RESEARCHES; TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERGONOMICS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PILOT STUDY; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH PRIORITY; UNITED KINGDOM; BIOENGINEERING; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

ASPIRATIONS (PSYCHOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84916942476     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bajekal M., Harries T., et al. Review of Disability Estimates and Definitions: a Study Carried Out on Behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions 2004, Department for Work and Pensions, London.
2. Broers A., et al. Ageing: Scientific Aspects 2005, vol. 1. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, Report, HL Paper 20-I.
3. Cassim J., Durkan M. Giving Disabled People a Voice in the Design Process 2005, Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, London.
4. Cassim J., Durkan M. How Designers Respond to the Demands of Inclusion 2006, Helen Hamlyn Research Centre, London.
5. Charness N., Bosman E.A. Human factors and age. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition 1992, 495-551. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, Ch 10. F.I. M Craik, T.A. Salthouse (Eds.).
6. Clarkson P.J., Coleman R., Hosking I., Waller S.D. Inclusive Design Toolkit 2007, Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, UK, ISBN 9780954524326 Available at:. http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com.
7. Clarkson P.J., Coleman R., Keates S., Lebbon C. Inclusive design: design for the whole population 2003, Springer-Verlag, London.
8. Coleman R. From Margins to Mainstream: Why Inclusive Design is Better Design 2006, In the 2006 Ergonomics Society Annual Lecture.
9. Devore D. 1996 Disability Survey Technical Report (au4090uab.pdf) 1998, Department of Social Security, London.
10. Dong H., Clarkson P.J., Ahmed S., Keates S. Investigating perceptions of manufacturers and retailers to inclusive design. The Design Journal 2004, 7(3):3-15.
11. EDeAN, 2012, (accessed 12.11.12.). http://www.edean.org/central.aspx%3fsId%3d64I160I327I323I259530.
12. Elton E.M., Nicolle C.A. The importance of context in inclusive design. Proceedings of the Ergonomics Society Contemporary Ergonomics, 13-15 April, Contemporary Ergonomics 2010 2010, Keele University, Staffordshire, pp.1-16. P.D. Bust (Ed.).
13. Fisk D., Rogers W. Human Factors and the Older Adult 1997, Academic Press, London.
14. Fitzpatrick J., et al. Inclusion through Innovation: Tackling Social Exclusion through New Technologies 2005, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
15. Forgas J. Affect and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2008, 3(2):94-101.
16. Fors S., Thorslund M., et al. Do actions speak louder than words? Self-assessed and performance-based measures of physical and visual function among old people. European Journal of Ageing 2006, 3:15-21.
17. Fozard J.L. Ageing and technology: a developmental view. Designing for an Aging Population: Ten Years of Human Factors and Ergonomics Research 1997, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. W.A. Rogers (Ed.).
18. Fozard J.L., et al. Goals for the Next Generation of Longitudinal Studies, Ageing Health and Competence 1993, Elsevier.
19. Fredrickson B. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological 2004, 359:1367-1377.
20. Grundy E., Ahlburg D., et al. Disability in Great Britain 1999, Department of Social Security/Corporate Document Services, London/Leeds.
21. Hartson H.R. Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. BIT 2003, 22(5):315-338.
22. Iburg K., Salomon J., et al. Cross-population comparability of self-reported and physician-assessed mobility levels: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy Discussion Paper No. 14 2001, 1-17. World Health Organisation.
23. Johnson D.P., Clarkson P.J., Huppert F. Capability measurement for inclusive design. Journal of Engineering Design 2010, 21(2-3):275-288.
24. Jordan P. Designing Pleasurable Products 2000, Taylor and Francis.
25. Kempen G., van Heuvelen M., et al. Factors affecting contrasting results between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitations. Age and Ageing 1996, 25:458-464.
26. Kondraske G.V. AWorking Model for Human System-task Interfaces. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook 2000, vol. 2. CRC Press, pp.147-141-141-118. second ed.
27. Kose S. Universal design: myths, beliefs, and realities. Future of Design: Universal Design of the Environment, Products and Information 1999, 59-100. Toshi-Bunkasha, Tokyo. S. Kose (Ed.).
28. Langdon P.M., Lewis T., Clarkson P.J. The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products. Universal Access in the Information Society 2007, 6:179-191.
29. Langdon P.M., Persad U., Clarkson P.J. Developing a Model of Cognitive Interaction for Analytical Inclusive Design. Special Edition of Interacting with Computers: Inclusion and Interaction - Designing Interaction for Inclusive Populations 2010, vol. 22:510-529. Elsevier.
30. Langdon P.M., Thimbleby H. Inclusion and Interaction: Designing Interaction for Inclusive Populations. Editorial for Special Edition of Interacting with Computers 2010, vol. 22:439-448. Elsevier.
31. Martin J., Elliot D. Creating an overall measure of severity of disability for the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Disability Survey. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society) 1992, 155(1):121-140.
32. Martin J., Meltzer H., et al. The Prevalence of Disability Among Adults. Volume 1 of OPCS Surveys of Disability in Great Britain 1988, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
33. Melzer D., Lan T., et al. Variation in thresholds for reporting mobility disparity between national population subgroups and studies. The Journals of Gerontology 2004, 59A(12):1295-1303.
34. Microsoft Accessible technology market research commissioned by Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com.
35. Newell, A., Gregor, P. 2000. User sensitive inclusive design: in search of a new paradigm. In: ACM CUU 2000, pp. 39-44.
36. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering 1993, Academic Press, London.
37. Norman D. Emotion and design: attractive things work better. Interactions Magazine 2002, ix:36-42.
38. Norman D. Living with Complexity 2011, MIT Press.
39. Persad U., Langdon P., et al. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Universal Access in the Information Society 2007, 6(2):119-135.
40. Philips The Philips Index 2004, http://www.usa.philips.com.
41. Piatt W. Connecting the UK: the digital strategy 2005, Strategy Unit, London, UK.
42. Pirkl J. Transgenerational Design: Products for an Ageing Population 1993, Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY.
43. Porter J., Case K., et al. 'Beyond Jack and Jill': designing for individuals using HADRIAN. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2004, 33:249-264.
44. USERfit. A Practical Handbook on User Centred Design for Assistive Technology 1996, HUSAT Research Institute for the European Commission. D. Poulson, M. Ashby, S.J. Richardson (Eds.).
45. Rabbitt P.M.A. Does it all go together when it goes? The nineteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 46A(3):385-434.
46. Rizzo A., Marchigiani E., Andreadis A. The AVANTI Project: Prototyping and Evaluation with a Cognitive Walkthrough Based on the Norman's Modelof Action 1997, 305-309. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '97), Amsterdam.
47. Robine J., Jagger C., et al. Selection of a Coherent Set of Health Indicators for the European Union - Phase II: Final Report 2002, 1-129. Euro-REVES, Montpellier. J. Robine, C. Jagger, I. Romieu (Eds.).
48. Rogers J., Holm M., et al. Concordance of four methods of disability assessment using performance in the home as the criterion method. Arthritis and Rheumatism (Arthritis Care and Research) 2003, 49(5):640-647.
49. Ryu H., Monk A. Analysing interaction problems with Cyclic Interaction Theory: low-level interaction walkthrough. Psychology Journal 2004, 2(3):304-330.
50. Semmence J., Gault S., et al. Family resources survey 1998, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
51. Smith D. Human Factors and Ageing: an Overview of Research Needs and Applications Opportunities 1990, Human Factors, 90/32/5.
52. Smith S., Norris B., Peebles L. Older Adultdata: the Handbook of Measurements and Capabilities of the Older Adult - Data for Design Safety 2000, University of Nottingham, Product Safety and Testing Group, DTI/Pub 4445/3k/01/00 URN 00/500.
53. Stanton N. Human Factors in Consumer Products 1998, Taylor & Francis, London.
54. Stephanidis C., et al. Adaptable and adaptive user interfaces for disabled users in the AVANTI project. IS&N'98 1998, 153-166. S. Triglia (Ed.).
55. Tate R., Smeeth L., et al. The prevalence of visual impairment in the UK: a review of the literature 2005, Report Commissioned by the Royal National Institute of the Blind.
56. Tennati R., Johnson D., et al. Towards a capabilities database to inform inclusive design: experimental investigation of effective survey-based predictors of human-product interaction. Applied Ergonomics 2012, 43(4):713-726. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
57. Towards Better Design, 2010. (accessed 15.11.12.). http://www.esds.ac.uk/findingData/snDescription.asp%3fsn%3d6997.
58. Van den Brink C., Tijhuis M., et al. Self-reported disability and its association with performance-based limitation in elderly men: a comparison of three European countries. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2003, 51(6):782-788.
59. Waller S.D., Langdon P.M., Clarkson P.J. Using disability data to estimate design exclusion. Universal Access in the Information Society 2010, 9(3):195-207. Available online at:, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0168-x. http://www.springerlink.com.
60. Warburton N. Everyday Inclusive Design. Inclusive Design - Design for the Whole Population 2003, Springer-Verlag, London. P.J. Clarkson, R. Coleman, S. Keates, C. Lebbon (Eds.).
61. Wickens C.D., Hollands J.G. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 2000, Prentice-Hall. third ed.
62. Wijlhuizen G., Ooijendijk W. Measuring disability, the agreement between self evaluation and observation of performance. Disability and Rehabilitation 1999, 21(2):61-67.