Analysing interaction problems with cyclic interaction theory: Low-level interaction walkthrough

PsychNology Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 304-330

  Ryu, Hokyoung ^a   Monk, Andrew ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cyclic interaction theory; Goal reorganisation; Goal action matching; Low level interaction walkthrough; Mode

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548146054     PISSN: 17207525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Apple computer. (1992). Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
2. Bertelsen, O. W. (2004). The activity walkthrough: an expert review method based on activity theory. Paper presented at the NordiCHI, Tampere, Finland.
3. Byrne, M. D. (1995). A Working Memory Model of a Common Procedural Error (GITCS-95/06). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
4. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Dix, A. J. (1987). Formal Methods and Interactive Systems: Principles and Practice. The University of York, York.
6. Dix, A. J. (1991). Formal methods for interactive systems. London: Academic Press.
7. Dix, A. J. (2001). Excel mode error [Personal Web]. Retrieved 11, 05, 2004, from the World Wide Web: http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/dixa/casestudy/excel-mode/
8. Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K., & Wensveen, S. (2002). But how, Donald, tell us how? on the creation of meaning in interaction design through feedforward and inherent feedback. Paper presented at the DIS 2002, London.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
10. Harel, D. (1988). On visual formalisms. Communications of the ACM, 31, 514-530.
11. Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the Wild (Second ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
12. Mack, R. L., & Montaniz, F. (1994). Usability Inspection Methods. In R. L. Macks (Ed.), Usability Inspection Methods (pp. 295-339). New York: John Wiley.
13. Monk, A. (1986). Mode errors-a user-centered analysis and some preventative measures using keying-contingent sound. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(4), 313-327.
14. Monk, A. (1998). Cyclic interaction: a unitary approach to intention, action and the environment. Cognition, 68(2), 95-110.
15. Monk, A. (1999). Modelling cyclic interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(2), 127-139.
16. Monk, A. F. (2000). Noddy's Guide to Consistency. Interfaces(45), 4-7.
17. Nardi, B. A. (Ed.). (1997). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. Norman, D. A. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In S. W. Draper (Ed.), User Centered System Design (pp. 29-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Norman, D. A. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things: Basic Books.
20. Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. ACM Interactions, 38-42.
21. Payne, S. J., & Green, T. R. G. (1986). Task-action grammars: a model of the mental representation of task languages. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 93-133.
22. Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. (1992). Cognitive walkthroughs-a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(5), 741-773.
23. Ryu, H. (2002). Will it be upper-case or will it be lower-case: can a prompt for text be a mode signal? Paper presented at the CHI 2002, Minneapolis, MN.
24. Ryu, H. (2003). Modelling cyclic interaction: an account of goal-elimination process. Paper presented at the CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
25. Ryu, H., & Monk, A. (2004a). An interaction model: from a user model to an environment model. Paper presented at the OZCHI, Wollongong, Austrailia.
26. Ryu, H., & Monk, A. (2004b). Will it be a capital letter: signalling case mode in mobile devices. Interacting with Computers, Revised.
27. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Vicente, K. (2004). The Human Factor: Revolutionzing the Way People Live with Technology. New York: Routledge.
29. Wharton, C., Bradford, J., Jeffries, R., & Franzke, M. (1992). Applying Cognitive Walkthroughs To More Complex User Interfaces: Experiences, Issues, And Recommendations. Paper presented at the CHI.
30. Wright, P. C., Fields, R. E., & Harrison, M. D. (2000). Analyzing human-computer interaction as distributed cognition: the resources model. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(1), 1-41.
31. Young, R. M. (1983). Surrogates and mappings: two kinds of conceptual models for interactive devices. In D. Gentner, and Stevens, A. L (Ed.), Mental models: Hillsdale.