A Qualitative Analysis of Approaches To Contraceptive Counseling

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 233-240

  Dehlendorf, Christine ^a   Kimport, Katrina ^b   Levy, Kira ^a   Steinauer, Jody ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Research sociologist Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; COUNSELING; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECORDING; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; COUNSELING; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SAN FRANCISCO; TAPE RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84916936223     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: 19312393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/46e2114     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Finer LB and Zolna MR, Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008, American Journal of Public Health, 2014, 104(Suppl. 1):S43-S48.
2. Gipson JD, Koenig MA and Hindin MJ, The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature, Studies in Family Planning, 2008, 39(1):18-38.
3. Jones J, Mosher W and Daniels K, Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995, National Health Statistics Reports, 2012, No. 60.
4. Hatcher RA et al., Contraceptive Technology, 19th ed., New York: Ardent Media, 2007.
5. Kost K et al., Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, Contraception, 2008, 77(1):10-21.
6. Vaughan B et al., Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, Contraception, 2008, 78(4):271-283.
7. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
8. Doyle C, Lennox L and Bell D, A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness, BMJ Open, 2013, Vol. 3, Issue 1, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570, accessed June 10, 2014.
9. Rathert C, Wyrwich MD and Boren SA, Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature, Medical Care Research and Review, 2013, 70(4):351-379.
10. RamaRao S et al., The link between quality of care and contraceptive use, International Family Planning Perspectives, 2003, 29(2):76-83.
11. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Burnhill MS, Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(2):89-92 & 104.
12. Forrest JD and Frost JJ, The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women, Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 28(6):246-255 & 277.
13. Guendelman S et al., Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2000, 4(4):233-239.
14. Dehlendorf C et al., Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making, Contraception, 2013, 88(2):250-256.
15. Kim YM et al., Client participation and provider communication in family planning counseling: transcript analysis in Kenya, Health Communication, 1999, 11(1):1-19.
16. Kim YM et al., Client communication behaviors with health care providers in Indonesia, Patient Education & Counseling, 2001, 45(1):59-68.
17. Abdel-Tawab N and Roter D, The relevance of client-centered communication to family planning settings in developing countries: lessons from the Egyptian experience, Social Science & Medicine, 2002, 54(9):1357-1368.
18. Kirimlioglu N, Elcioglu O and Yildiz Z, Client participation and provider communication in family planning counselling and the sample study from Turkey, European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 2005, 10(2):131-141.
19. Kim YM, Kols A and Mucheke S, Informed choice and decision-making in family planning counseling in Kenya, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 24(1):4-11 & 42.
20. Kim YM et al., Participation by clients and nurse midwives in family planning decision making in Indonesia, Patient Education & Counseling, 2003, 50(3):295-302.
21. Stewart M, Towards a global definition of patient centred care, BMJ, 2001, 322(7284):444-445.
22. Dwamena F et al., Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2012, Issue 12, No. CD003267.
23. Moos MK, Bartholomew NE and Lohr KN, Counseling in the clinical setting to prevent unintended pregnancy: an evidence-based research agenda, Contraception, 2003, 67(2):115-132.
24. Halpern V et al., Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011, Issue 4, No. CD004317.
25. Charmaz K, Constructing Grounded Theory, London: Sage, 2006.
26. Knox SA et al., The effect of adverse information and positive promotion on women's preferences for prescribed contraceptive products, Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 83:70-80.
27. Lessard LN et al., Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2012, 44(3):194-200.
28. Upadhyay U, Informed choice in family planning: helping people decide, Population Reports, 2001, Series J, No. 50.
29. Charles C, Gafni A and Whelan T, Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango), Social Science & Medicine, 1997, 44(5):681-692.
30. Makoul G and Clayman ML, An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters, Patient Education & Counseling, 2006, 60(3):301-312.
31. Charles C, Gafni A and Whelan T, Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model, Social Science & Medicine, 1999, 49(5):651-661.
32. Frosch DL et al., Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled "difficult" among key obstacles to shared decision making, Health Affairs, 2012, 31(5):1030-1038.
33. Caress AL et al., Involvement in treatment decisions: What do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey, Thorax, 2005, 60(3):199-205.
34. Tariman JD et al., Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review, Annals of Oncology, 2010, 21(6):1145-1151.
35. Department of Health and Human Services, Program Guidelines for Project Grants for Family Planning Services, 2001, , accessed Oct. 20, 2011.
36. Pariani S, Heer DM and Van Arsdol MD, Jr., Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use? Evidence from East Java, Studies in Family Planning, 1991, 22(6):384-390.
37. Chewning B et al., Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review, Patient Education & Counseling, 2012, 86(1):9-18.
38. Stiggelbout AM et al., Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare, BMJ, 2012, 344:e256, doi: 10.1136/bmj.e256, accessed June 11, 2014.
39. Moskowitz E and Jennings B, Directive counseling on long-acting contraception, American Journal of Public Health, 1996, 86(6):787-790.
40. Petersen R et al., Pregnancy and STD prevention counseling using an adaptation of motivational interviewing: a randomized controlled trial, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2007, 39(1):21-28.
41. Kirby D et al., Impact of an intervention to improve contraceptive use through follow-up phone calls to female adolescent clinic patients, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2010, 42(4):251-257.
42. Kalmuss D et al., Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women, Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 28(6):256-260.