Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low-income women

Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 256-260

  Kalmuss, Debra ^a,b   Davidson, Andrew R ^a   Cushman, Linda F ^a   Heartwell, Stephen ^a   Rulin, Marvin ^a  

^a Columbia University School of Public Health ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEADACHE; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MENSTRUAL IRREGULARITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREDICTION; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 0029844405     PISSN: 00147354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2136054     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. J. Trussell and K. Kost, "Contraceptive Failure in the United States: A Critical Review of the Literature," Studies in Family Planning, 18:237-283,1987;
2. and A. Thomas, Jr., and S. LcMelle, 'The Norplant System: Where Are We in 1995?" Journal of Family Practice, 40:125-127, 1995.
3. J. J. Frost, 'The Availability and Accessibility of the Contraceptive Implant for Family Planning Agencies in the United States, 1991-1992," Family Planning Perspectives, 26:4-10.
4. and L. Kaeser, "Public Funding and Policies for Provision of the Contraceptive Implant, Fiscal Year 1992," Family Planning Persivctiivs,26:11-16, 1994.
5. J. Trussell et al., "The Economic Value of Contraception: A Comparison of 15 Methods," American Journal of Public Health, 85:494-505, 1995.
6. Institute of Medicine, Vie Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-BeingofChildren and Families, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C, 1995;].
7. Trussell et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 3); and P. Lee and F. Stewart, "Failing to Prevent Unintended Pregnancy Is Costly," American Journal of Public Health, 85:479-480, 1995.
8. J. Diaz et al., "Bleeding Complaints During the First Year of Norplant Implants Use and Their Impact on Removal Rate," Contraception, 53:91-95,1996;
9. T. Kane, G. Farr and B. Janowitz, "Initial Acceptability of Contraceptive Implants in Four Developing Countries," International Family Planning Perspectives, 16:49-54, 1990;
10. G. Lopez et al., 'Two-Year Prospective Study in Colombia of Norplant Implants," Obstetrics and Gynecology, 68:204-208.1986;
11. F. Lubis et al., "One-Year Experience with Norplant Implants in Indonesia," Studies in Family Planning, 14:181-184,19S3;
12. I. Sivin, 'Norplant Clinical Trials," in S. E. Samuels and M. D. Smith, eds., Dimensions of New Contraceptives: Norplant and Poor-Women, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, Calif., 1992, pp. 1-19;
13. and S. Stavapan, K. Kanchanasinith and S. Varakamin, "Perceptions and Acceptability of Norplant Implants in Thailand," Studies in Family Planning, 14:170-176, 1983.
14. P. Darney et al., "Acceptance and Perceptions of Norplant among Users in San Francisco, USA," Studies in Family Planning, 21:152-156,1990; and I. Sivin, 1992, op. cit. (see reference 5).
15. V. Cullins et al., "Preliminary Experience with Norplant in an Inner City Population," Contraception, 47:193-203,1993; - ,
16. "Comparison of Adolescent and Adult Experiences with Levonorgestrel Contraceptive Implants," Obstetrics and Gynecology, 83:1026-1032,1994.
17. M. Polaneczky et al., "The Use of Levonorgestrel Implants (Norplant) for Contraception in Adolescent Mothers," Neie England Journal of Medicine, 331:1201-1206, 1994;
18. S. Rosenthal étal., "Experience with Side Effects and Health Risks Associated with Norplant Implant Use in Adolescents," Contraception, 52:283-285,1995.
19. A. Bcrenson and C. Wiemann, "Use of Levonorgestrel Implants Versus Oral Contraceptives in Adolescence: A Case-Control Study," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 172:1128-1135,1995;
20. Patient Satisfaction and Side Effects with Levonorgestrel Implant: Use in Adolescents 18 Years of Age or Younger," Pediatrics, 92:257-260,1993.
21. M. Frank et al., "Characteristics and Experiences of American Women Electing for Early Removal of Contraceptive Implants," Contraception, 52:159-165,1995;
22. and - , "One-Year Experience with Subdermal Contraceptive Implants in the United States," Contraception, 48:229-243, 1993.
23. VV. Grady, M. Hayward and F. Florey, "Contraceptive Discontinuation Among Married Women in the United States," Studies in Family Planning, 19:227-235,1988;
24. C. Hammerslough, "Characteristics of Women Who Stop Using Contraceptives," Family Planning Perspectives, 16:14-18,1984;
25. and L. Tyrer, "Obstacles to Use of Hormonal Contraception," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 170:1495-149a 1994.
26. M. Frank et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 8); - , 1993, op. cit. (see reference 8); and J. Diaz et al, 1996, op. cit. (see reference 5).
27. D. Kalmuss et al., "The Determinants of Norplant Use," paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, Calif., April 6-8, 1995.
28. M. Frank et al., 1995, op. cit., (see reference 8); and
29. - , 1993, op. cit. (see reference 8).
30. J. Diaz et al., 1996, op. cit. (see reference 5); and I. Sivin, 1992, op. cit. (see reference 5).
31. P. Darney et al., 1990, op. cit. (see reference 6); I. Sivin, 1992, op. cit. (see reference 5); and A. Berenson and C. Wiemann, 1993, op. cit. (see reference 7).
32. R. Hatcher et al., Contraceptive Technology, 16th revised ed., Irvington Publishers, New York, 1994.
33. A. Berenson and C. Wiemann, 1995, op. cit. (see reference 7); and M. Polaneczky et al., 1994, op. cit. (see reference?).
34. A. Davidson et ai., "Rates of Injectable Contraceptive Discontinuation and Subsequent Unintended Pregnancy Among Low-Income Women," paper submitted for publication.
35. S. Rosenthal et al., 1995, op. cit. (see reference 7);
36. and L. Dugoff et al., "Assessing the Acceptability of Norplant Contraceptive in Four Patient Populations," Contraception, 52:45-49,1995.