Cost-Benefit Analysis of policies for the development of electric vehicles in Germany: Methods and results

Transport Policy

Volumn 38, Issue , 2015, Pages 19-26

  Massiani, JérÔme ^a  

^a CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cost Benefit Analysis; Electric vehicles; Evaluation

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; EUROPEAN UNION; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

GERMANY;

EID: 84916898809     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AECOM Australia, 2009. Economic Viability of Electric Vehicles, for the Department of Environment and Climate Change: 88 p.
2. Bass F.M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Manag. Sci. 1969, 15(5):215-227.
3. Bass F.M. Comments on 'A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables': the Bass Model. Manag. Sci. 2004, 50(12):1833-1840.
4. Becker T.A., Siduh I., Tenderich B. Electric Vehicles in the United States: A New Model with Forecasts to 2030 2009, University of California, Berkeley.
5. Carlsson F., Johansson-Stenman O. Costs and benefits of electric vehicles. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 2003, 37(1):1-28.
6. Christidis P., Hidalgo I., Soria A. Dynamics of the introduction of new passenger car technologies: the IPTS transport technologies model 2003, Joint Research Center, EUR 20762 EN.
7. Draper M., Rodriguez E., Kaminsky P., Sidhu I., Tenderich B. Economic Impact of Electric Vehicle Adoption in the United States 2008, University of California, Berkeley.
8. Funk K., Rabl A. Electric versus conventional vehicles: social costs and benefits in France. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 1999, 4:15.
9. Gosh, A., Hemmert, G., Holtermann, M., Massiani J. and Weinmann J., 2011. MMEM Report, Part 2, Technical Notes, ESMT. Also available as: EMOB, technical documentation, Research note from Università Cà Foscari, Dipartimento di Economia.
10. Greene D.L. TAFV Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Choice Model Documentation., Center for Transportation Analysis 2001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
11. IWW, TRT, ME&P and CEBR, 2000. Final Report of ASTRA (Assessment of Transport Strategies) on behalf of the European Commission DG VII. Karlsruhe.
12. Kavalec C. CALCARS: The California Conventional and Alternative Fuel Response Simulator - A Nested Multinomial Logit Vehicle Demand and Choice Model 1996, California Energy Commission.
13. Kazimi C. Evaluating the environmental impact of alternative-fuel vehicles. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1997, 33(2):23.
14. Kazimi C. Valuing alternative-fuel vehicles in Southern California. Am. Econ. Rev. 1997, 87(2):7.
15. Keefe R., Griffin J., Graham J.D. The Benefits and Costs of New Fuels and Engines for Cars and Light Trucks 2007, Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California.
16. Kley, F., Wietschel M. and Dallinger D., 2010. Evaluation of European electric vehicle support schemes. Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer ISI: 24 (No. S 7/2010).
17. Kosub J. Transitioning to a Greener Fleet: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Vehicle Fleet Program at the Texas General Land Office in Austin, Texas 2010, Texas State University, San Marcos, Public Administration Program-Applied Research Projects. URL: 〈https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/3694〉, consulted Nov. 2014.
18. Mabit S.L., Fosgerau M. Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2011, 16(3):225-231.
19. Maibach, M., Schreyer, C., Sutter, D.,van Essen, H. P., Boon, B. H., Smokers, R., Schroten, A., Doll, C., Pawlowska, B. and Bak, M., 2008. Handbook on estimation of external cost in the transportsector. Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT, Delft, CE, 2007).
20. Massiani J. Using Stated Preferences to forecast alternative fuel vehicles market diffusion. Ital. J. Reg. Sci. 2012, 11:93-122.
21. Massiani J., Weinmann J. Estimating electric car's emissions in Germany: an analysis through a pivotal marginal method and comparison with other methods. Econ. Policy Energy Environ. 2012, 2:131-155.
22. Michalek J.J., Chester M., Jaramillo P., Samaras C., Shiau C.-S.N., Lave L.B. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108(40):16554-16558.
23. MiD, 2008. MOBILITÄT IN DEUTSCHLAND 2008 (MiD 2008), Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS).
24. Mock P., Hülsebusch D., Ungethüm J., Schmid S.A. Electric vehicles - A model based assessment of future market prospects and environmental impacts 2009, Stavanger, Norway.
25. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, 2009. The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Energy Industry. Austrian Climate Research Program.
26. Prognos-EWI-GWS, 2010. Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi).
27. Prud'homme R., Koning M. Electric vehicles: a tentative economic and environmental evaluation. Transp. Policy 2012, 23(0):60-69.
28. Rabl A. Analyse coÛt-bénéfice d'une voiture propre: méthodologie et application à la voiture électrique 2002, Centre d'Energétique, Paris.
29. Santini D.J., Vyas A.D. Suggestions for a New Vehicle Choice Model Simulating Advanced Vehicles Introduction Decisions (AVID): Structure and Coefficients 2005, The University of Chicago, Argonne National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
30. Shepherd S., Bonsall P., Harrison G. Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: a model based study. Transport Policy 2012, 20:62-74.
31. Simpson, A., 2006. Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS-22). Yokohama, Japan.
32. Singh M., Vyas A., Steiner E. VISION Model: Description of Model Used to Estimate the Impact of Highway Vehicle Technologies and Fuels on Energy Use and Carbon Emissions to 2050 2003, Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, U.S.
33. TNO, 2006. Review and analysis of the reduction potential and costs of technological and other measures to reduce CO2-emissions from passenger cars. TNO Science and Industry, 303.
34. Turrentine T.S., Kurani K.S. Car buyers and fuel economy?. Energy Policy 2006, 35:1213-1223.
35. Vance, C. and Mehlin M., 2009 Tax Policy and CO2 Emissions-An Econometric Analysis of the German Automobile Market. Ruhr Economic Papers, 19.
36. Zito P., Salerno S. Potential demand and cost-benefit analysis of electric cars. Eur. Transp. 2004, 27:1-14.