Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study

Transport Policy

Volumn 20, Issue , 2012, Pages 62-74

  Shepherd, Simon ^a   Bonsall, Peter ^a   Harrison, Gillian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alternative fuel vehicles; Electric vehicles; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; CARBON EMISSION; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; MARKETING; SUBSIDY SYSTEM;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84855770492     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AEA (2009) Market Outlook to 2022 for Battery Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Cars Report to the Committee on Climate Change AEA/ED46299/Issue 1.
2. Aftabuzzaman M., Mazloumi E. Achieving sustainable urban transport mobility in post peak oil era. Transport Policy 2011, 695-702.
3. Bass F.M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science 1969, 15(5):215-227.
4. Bass F.M., Bultez A.V. A note on optimal strategic pricing of technological innovations. Marketing Science 1982, 1(4):371-378.
5. Bass F.M., Krishnan T.V., et al. Why the bass model fits without decision variables. Marketing Science 1994, 13(3):203-223.
6. Batley R., Toner J., Knight M. A mixed logit model of UK household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. International Journal of Transport Economics 2004, 31(1):pp55-pp77.
7. Beggs S., Cardell S., Hausman J. Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics 1981, 16:1-19.
8. Bemmaor A.C., Lee J. The impact of heterogeneity and ill-conditioning on diffusion model parameter estimates. Marketing Science 2002, 21(2):209-220.
9. BERR and DfT (2008). Investigation into the Scope for the Transport Sector to Switch to Electric Vehicles and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles.
10. Boston Consulting Group (2009) The come back of the electric car? How real, how soon and what must happen next. (accessed October 2010). http://www.bcg.com/publications.
11. Brownstone D., Bunch D.S., et al. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 2000, 34(5):315-338.
12. Caulfield B., Farrell S., McMahon B. Examining individuals preferences for hybrid electric and alternatively fuelled vehicles. Transport Policy 2010, 381-387.
13. CfIT (2001) European comparison of taxes on car ownership. Commission for Integrated Transport. (accessed 29/10/2010). http://cfit.independent.gov.uk/pubs/2001/scot0122/scot0122/index.htm.
14. Dagsvik J.K., Wennemo T., et al. Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological 2002, 36(4):361-384.
15. DfT Making the Connection; The Plug-in Vehicle Infrastructure Strategy 2011, Department for Transport Guidance Document, London.
16. Dodson J.A., Muller E. Models of new product diffusion through advertising and word of mouth. Management Science 1978, 24(15):1568-1577.
17. Easingwold C.J., Mahajan V., et al. A nonuniform influence innovation diffusion model of new product acceptance. Marketing Science 1983, 2(3):273-295.
18. Energy Saving Trust (2007). Passenger Car Market Transformation Model. Final Report. Energy Saving Trust, London.
19. Flynn P. Commercializing an alternate vehicle fuel: lessons learned from natural gas for vehicle. Energy Policy 2002, 30:613-619.
20. Greene D.L., Duleep K.G., et al. Future potential of hybrid and diesel powertrains in the U.S. light-duty vehcile market 2004, O. R. N. Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy.
21. Hoyer K.G. The history of alternative fuels in transportation: the case of electric and hybrid cars. Utilities Policy 2008, 63-71.
22. Janssen A., Lienin S.F., et al. Model aided policy development for the market penetration of natural gas vehicles in Switzerland. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:316-333.
23. JATO Dynamics (2011). "Incentives Fail to Stimulate European Electric Vehicle Sales" - . http://www.jato.com/PressReleases/Incentives%20Fail%20to%20Stimulate%20European%20Electric%20Vehicle%20Sales.pdf.
24. Kohler J., Wietschel M., et al. Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2010, 77(8):1237-1248. 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.010.
25. 2 emission trends from car travel: Great Britain 2000-2030. Transport Policy 2005, 12:175-184.
26. Meyer P.E., Winebrake J.J. Modeling technology diffusion of complementary goods: the case of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure. Technovation 2009, 77-91.
27. OECD/IEA Technology Roadmap Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles 2009, International Energy Agency, 〈www.iea.org〉.
28. OECD/TF (2010). Reducing Transport GHG Emissions - Trends and Data 2010.
29. Potoglou D., Kanaroglou P.S. Household demand and willingness to pay for clean vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2007, 12(4):264-274.
30. Roche M.Y., Mourato S., et al. Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: a review of the evidence and methodological implications. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5301-5310.
31. Schmidt G.M., Druehl C.T. Changes in product attributes and costs as drivers of new product diffusion and substitution. Production and Operations Management 2005, 14(3):272-285.
32. Sterman J.D. Business Dynamics : Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World 2000, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston.
33. Struben J., Sterman J.D. Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B - Planning & Design 2008, 35(6):1070-1097.
34. Supple, D.R. (2007). Managing the transition toward self-sustaining alternative fuel vehicle markets: policy analysis using a dynamic model. The 2007 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society July 29 - August 2, 2007, Boston, MA, USA.
35. Ulli-Beer S., GAssmann F., Bosshardt M., Wokaun A. Generic structure to simulate acceptance dynamics. System Dynamics Review 2010, 26(2):89-116.
36. Van den Bulte C., Stremersch S. Social contagion and income heterogeneity in new product diffusion: a meta-analytic test. Marketing Science 2004, 23(4):530-544.
37. Walther G., Wansart J., Kieckhafer K., Schnieder E., Spengler T.S. Impact assessment in the automotive industry: mandatory market introduction of alternative powertrain technologies. System Dynamics Review 2010, 26(3):239-261.
38. Yeh S. An empirical analysis on the adoption of alternative fuel vehicles: the case of natural gas vehicles. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5865-5875.
39. Zhang T., Gensler S., Rosanna G. A study of the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles: an agent-based modeling approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2011, 28:152-168.