Using stated preferences to forecast the market diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles;Uso delle preferenze dichiarate per prevedere la diffusione dei veicoli a motorizzazione alternativa

Scienze Regionali

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 93-122

  Massiani, Jérôme ^a  

^a CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Alternative fuel vehicle; Market diffusion; Stated preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877842244     PISSN: 17203929     EISSN: 2035603X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Achtnicht M. (2009), German Car Buyers' Willingness to Pay to Reduce CO2 Emissions. Mannheim: ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, ZEW Discussion Papers n. 09-058.
2. Achtnicht M. (2010), Response to a ESMT Request for Further Information on Results of the Research Project ECO-CARS. Unpublished communication. 22 July 2010.
3. Achtnicht M., Bühler G., Hermeling C. (2008), Impact of Service Station Networks on Purchase Decisions of Alternative-fuel Vehicles. Mannheim: ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, ZEW Discussion Paper n. 08-088.
4. Adler T., Wargelin L., Kostyniuk L. P., Kavalec C., Occhuizzo G. (2003), Incentives for Alternate Fuel Vehicles: A Large-Scale Stated Preference Experiment. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research. Held at Lucerne: Switzerland, August.
5. AECOM Australia (2009), Economic Viability of Electric Vehicles. Report prepared for Department of Environment and Climate Change. Sydney: AECOM Australia Pty Ltd.
6. Ahn J., Jeong G., Kim Y. (2008), A Forecast of Household Ownership and use of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Multiple Discrete-continuous Choice Approach. Energy Economics, 30, 5: 2091-2104.
7. Axsen J., Mountain D. C., Jaccard M. (2009), Combining Stated and Revealed Choice Research to Simulate the Neighbor Effect: The Case of Hybrid-electric Vehicles. Resource and Energy Economics, 31, 3: 221-238.
8. Bass F. M. (1969), A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15, 5: 215-227.
9. Bass F. M. (2004), Comments on "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables": The Bass Model. Management Science, 50, 12: 1833-1840.
10. Batley R., Toner J. (2003), Elimination-by-aspects and Advanced Logit Models of Stated Choices for Alternative-fuel Vehicles. Proceedings of the European Transport conference. Held at Strasbourg: France, October.
11. Batley R., Toner J., Knight M. J. (2004), A Mixed Logit Model of U.K. Household Demand for Alternative-fuel Vehicles. International Journal of Transport Economics, XXXI, 1: 55-77.
12. Beggs S. D., Cardell N. S. (1980), Choice of Smallest Car by Multi-vehicle Households and the Demand for Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research A, 14, 5-6: 389-404.
13. Beggs S. D., Cardell N. S., Hausman J. (1981), Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars. Journal of Econometrics, 17, 1: 1-19.
14. Brownstone D., Bunch D. S., Train K. E. (2000), Joint Mixed Logit Models of Stated and Revealed Preferences for Alternative-fuel Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34, 5: 315-338.
15. Brownstone D., Train K. E. (1999), Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns. Journal of Econometrics, 89, 1-2: 109-129.
16. Bunch D. S., Bradley M., Golob T. F., Kitamura R., Occhiuzzo G. P. (1993), Demand for Clean-fuel Vehicles in California: A Discrete-choice Stated Preference Pilot Project. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27, 3: 237-253.
17. Calfee J. E. (1985), Estimating the Demand for Electric Automobiles Using Fully Dis-aggregated Probabilistic Choice Analysis. Transportation Research B, 19, 4: 287-301.
18. Cao X., Mokhtarian P. L. (2004), The Future Demand for Alternative Fuel Passenger Vehicles: A Diffusion of Innovation Approach. Davis: University of California, Caltrans Air Quality Project, Conformity: Regional & Project Level Research Report, Task Order n. 31. (Available at: http://aqp.engr.ucdavis.edu).
19. Caulfield B., Farrell S., McMahon B. (2010), Examining Individuals Preferences for Hybrid Electric and Alternatively Fuelled Vehicles. Transport Policy, 17, 6: 381-387.
20. Dagsvik J. K., Liu G. (2009), A Framework for Analyzing Rank-ordered Data with Application to Automobile Demand. Transportation Research Part A, 43: 1-12.
21. Dagsvik J. K., Wennemo T., Wetterwald D. G., Aaberge R. (2002), Potential Demand for Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36, 4: 361-384.
22. Ewing G. O., Sariloglu E. (1998), Car Fuel-type Choice under Travel Demand Management and Economic Incentives. Transportation Research D, 3, 6: 429-444.
23. Golob T. F., Kitamura R., Bradley M., Bunch D. S. (1991), Predicting the Market Penetration of Electric and Clean-fuel Vehicles. Irvine: University of California Irvine, Institute of Transportation Studies, Working paper UCI-ITS-WP 91-13.
24. Gosh A., Hemmert G., Holtermann M., Massiani J., Weinmann J. (2011), MMEM, Market Model Electric Mobility: Cars and infrastructure Report, Part 2, Technical Notes. Berlin: ESMT.
25. Greene D. L. (1994), Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Choice Model. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report n. ORNL/TM-12738.
26. Greene D. L. (2001), TAFV Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Choice Model Documentation. Oak Ridge: Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Report n. ORNL/TM 2001-134.
27. Greene D. L. (2010), How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review. Report EPA-420-R-10-008. Washington: EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency. (Available at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations/420r10008.pdf).
28. Hensher D., Rose J. M., Greene W. (2005), Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hess S., Fowler M., Adler T. (2009), A Joint Model for Vehicle Type and Fuel Type. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference. Held at Leeuwenhoorst: The Netherlands, October.
30. Hidrue M. K., Parsons G. R., Kempton W., Gardner M. P. (2011), Willingness to Pay for Electric Vehicles and their Attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 3: 686-705.
31. Högberg M. (2007), Eco-driving? A Discrete Choice Experiment on Valuation of Car Attributes. Linköping: Swedish National Road, VTI, Transport Research Institute, Working Paper n. 2007-13.
32. Horsky D., Nelson P. E., Posavac S. S. (2004), Stating Preference for the Ethereal but Choosing the Concrete: How the Tangibility of Attributes Affects Attribute Weighting in Value Elicitation and Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 1-2: 132-140.
33. IMUG (2010), MarktForschrungsstudie zur Verbrauchakzeptanz von Elektrofahrzeugen- Ergebnisbericht. BDEW Initiative ELAN 2020. Berlin: BDEW Bundesverband der Energie und Wasserwirtschaft.
34. Karmasin Motivforschung, Prolytic Demand Management (2010), eAuto: Motivlandkarte zeigt Marktpotentiale. Wien: Karmasin Motivforschung.
35. Knight M. J. (2001), Stated Preferences for Alternative-fuel Vehicles (MA dissertation). Leeds: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds.
36. Knockaert J. (2005), The Choice for Alternative Cars. Leuven: Energy, Tansport and Environment, Center for Economic Studies, Katolieke Universiteit Leuven.
37. Kroes E., Sheldon R. (1988), Stated Preference Methods: An Introduction. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 22, 1: 11-25.
38. Kuwano M., Zhang J., Fujiwara A. (2005), Analysis of Ownership behavior of lowemission Passenger Cars in local Japanese Cities. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5: 1379-1393.
39. Lamberson P. (2008), The Diffusion of Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Report by: Sustainable Mobility Accessibility Research and Transformation (SMART). Ann Arbor, MI: CARSS, University of Michigan Center for Advancing Research and Solutions for Society.
40. Leiby P., Rubin J. (1996), The Transitional Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Model (TAFVM). Purpose and Overview Working Draft. Oak Ridge: Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
41. Leiby P., Rubin J. (2000), The Alternative Fuel Transition: Results from the TAFV Model of Alternative Fuel Use in Light-Duty Vehicles 1996-2010. Oak Ridge: Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
42. Mabit S. L., Fosgerau M. (2011), Demand for Alternative-fuel Vehicles when Registration Taxes are High. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 3: 225-231.
43. Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. M. (1990), New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research. The Journal of Marketing, 54, 1: 1-26.
44. Massiani J. (2005), La valeur du temps en transport de marchandises. Thèses. Créteil: Université Paris-Est, Faculté de Sciences Economiques et de Gestion.
45. Mock P., Hülsebusch D., Ungethüm J., Schmid S. A. (2009), Electric vehicles - A model Based Assessment of Future Market Prospects and Environmental Impacts. 24th EVS, Electric Vehicle Symposium Conference. Held at Stavenger: Norway, May.
46. Öko-Institut, ISOE. (2011), Optimierung der Umweltentlastungspotenziale von Elektrofahrzeugen Integrierte Betrachtung von Fahrzeugnutzung und Energiewirtschaft Report. 6 april 2011. Berlin: Öko-Institut, ISOE.
47. Potoglou D., Kanaroglou P. S. (2007), Household Demand and Willingness to Pay for Clean Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12, 4: 264-274.
48. Ramjerdi F., Rand L. (1999), Demand for Clean Fuel Car in Norway. Paper presented at the 2nd KFB, Kommunikations Forsknings Beredningen Research Conference. Held at Lund: Sweden, June.
49. Richardson B. C., McAlinden S. P., Belzowski B. M., Booms C., Ebarvia B. N., Hill K. (1999), Method for Estimating Market Acceptance of Technologies and Fuels of The Partnership for a New Generation of Vehicles. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Office for the Study of Automotive. Report 99-15.
50. Rose J. M., Bliemer M. C. J. (2009), Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experimental Designs. Transport Reviews: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, 29, 5: 587-617.
51. Santini D. J., Vyas A. D. (2005), Suggestions for a New Vehicle Choice Model Simulating Advanced Vehicles Introduction Decisions (AVID): Structure and Coefficients. Chicago: Argonne National Laboratory, The University of Chicago.
52. Struben J. (2004), Technology Transitions: Identifying Challenges for Hydrogen Vehicles. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
53. Tompkins M., Bunch D. S., Santini D. J., Bradley M., Vyas A. D., Poyer D. (1998), Determinants of Alternative Fuel Vehicle Choice in the Continental United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1641, 1: 130-138.
54. Train K. E. (1980), The Potential Demand for Non-Gasoline-Powered Automobiles. Transportation Research, 14A: 405-414.
55. Turrentine T. S., Kurani K. S. (2006), Car Buyers and Fuel Economy? Energy Policy, 35: 1213-1223.
56. Ziegler A. (2010), Individual Characteristics and Stated Preferences for Alternative Energy Sources and Propulsion Technologies in Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis. Zurich: CER-ETH, Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Economic Working Paper n. 10/125.
57. Zito P., Salerno S. (2004), Potential Demand and Cost-benefit Analysis of Electric Cars. European Transport, 27: 1-14.