Recasting payments for ecosystem services (PES) in water resource management: A novel institutional approach

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 10, Issue , 2014, Pages 144-154

  Kolinjivadi, Vijay ^a   Adamowski, Jan ^a   Kosoy, Nicolás ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Capabilities approach; Integrated water resource management; Nested institutions; PES

Indexed keywords

EID: 84916878559     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agrawal A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev. 2001, 29:1649-1672.
2. Aligica P.D., Tarko V. Polycentricity: from Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond. Governance 2012, 25(2):237-262.
3. Alkire, S., Santos, M.E., 2010. Acute Multidimensional Poverty: A New Index for Developing Countries. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative Working Paper No. 38. Oxford.
4. Berkes F.L., Folke C., Colding J. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Biswas A. Integrated water resources management: a reassessment: a water forum contribution. Water Int. 2004, 29(2):248-256.
6. Bowles S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "the moral sentiments": evidence from economic experiments. Science 2008, 320:1605-1609.
7. Brondizio E.S., Ostrom E., Young O.R. Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2009, 34:253-278.
8. Brown T.C., Bergstrom J.C., Loomis J.B. Defining, valuing, and providing ecosystem goods and services. Nat. Resour. J. 2007, 47(2):329-376.
9. Cardenas J.C., Stranlund J.K., Willis C.E. Local environmental control and institutional crowding-out. World Dev. 2000, 28:1719-1733.
10. Castree N. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and regulation. Environ. Plann. A 2008, 40(1):131-152.
11. Corbera E., Brown K., Adger W.N. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Dev. Change 2007, 38(4):587-613.
12. Daly H.E., Farley J. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications 2004, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
13. de Klemm C., Shine C. Biological Diversity Conservation and the Law 1993, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland.
14. Duraiappah A. Ecosystem services and human well-being: do global findings make any sense?. BioScience 2011, 61(1):7-8.
15. Duraiappah A.K., Asah S.T., Brondizio E.S., Kosoy N., O'Farrell P.J., Prieur-Richard A.H., Subramanian S.M., Takeuchi K. Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2014, 7:94-100.
16. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):663-764.
17. Escobar M.M., Hollaender R., Weffer C.P. Institutional durability of payments for watershed services: lessons from two case studies from Colombia and Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 6:46-53.
18. Farley J. Conservation through the Economics Lens. Environ. Manage. 2010, 45:26-38.
19. Farley J., Costanza R. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(11):2060-2068.
20. Fehr E., Falk A. Psychological foundations of incentives. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2002, 46:687-724.
21. The new Generation of Watershed Management Programmes and Projects 2008, FAO, (Forestry Paper 150), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
22. Fisher J. Chapter 2: Justice implications of conditionality in payments for ecosystem services: a case study from Uganda. The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services 2013, Routledge, London. T. Sikor (Ed.).
23. Fisher B., Kulindwa K., Mwanyoka I., Turner R.K., Burgess N.D. Common pool resource management and PES: lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1253-1261.
24. Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30:441-473.
25. Functowicz S.O., Ravetz J. Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1994, 13:1881-1885.
26. Galaz V., Biermann F., Folke C., Nilsson M., Olsson P. Global environmental governance and planetary boundaries: an introduction. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 81:1-3.
27. Gauvin C., Uchida E., Rozelle S., Xu J., Zhan J. Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services with dual goals of environment and poverty alleviation. Environ. Manage. 2010, 45:488-501.
28. Gowdy J., O'Hara S. Weak sustainability and viable technologies. Ecol. Econ. 1997, 22:239-247.
29. Grieg-Gran M., Porras I.T., Wunder S. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev. 2005, 33:1511-1527.
30. Hope R.A., Porras I.T., Miranda M. Can Payments for Environmental Services Contribute to Poverty Reduction? A Livelihoods Analysis From Arenal, Costa Rica 2005, Centre for Land Use and Water Resources Research (CLUWRR), Newcastle, (accessed 10 July 2012).
31. Huitema D., Mostert E., Egas W., Moellenkamp S., Pahl-Wostl C., Yalcin R. Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive co-management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14(1):26.
32. ICIMOD 2010. Case Study: Dhulikhel Drinking Water Supply Scheme (DDWSS) Unpublished Report. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development.
33. Jack B.K., Leimona B., Ferraro P.J. A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 23(2):359-367.
34. Kemkes R.J., Farley J., Koliba C.J. Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2069-2074.
35. Kerr J., Vardhan M., Jindal R. Prosocial behavior and incentives: evidence from field experiments in rural Mexico and Tanzania. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 73:220-227.
36. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1228-1236.
37. Kosoy N., Martínez-Tuna M., Muradian R., Martínez-Alier R. Payments for environmental services in watersheds: insights from a comparative study of three cases in Central America. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61:446-455.
38. Lebel L., Daniel R. The governance of ecosystem services from tropical upland watersheds. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability 2009, 1:61-68.
39. Martínez-Alier J., Munda G., O'Neill J. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 26:277-286.
40. McAfee K. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Dev. Change 2012, 43(1):105-131.
41. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Scenarios 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), Island Press, Washington, D.C.
42. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., May P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1202-1208.
43. Norgaard R. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1219-1227.
44. Nussbaum M. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Econ. 2003, 9(2-3):33-59.
45. O'Neill J. Property, care, and environment. Environ. Plann. C 2001, 19:695-711.
46. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
47. Ostrom E. Understanding Institutional Diversity 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
48. Pahl-Wostl C., Sendzimir J., Jeffrey P., Aerts J., Berkamp G., Cross K. Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(2):30.
49. Pascual U., Muradian R., Rodriguez L.C., Duraiappah A. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1237-1244.
50. Polishchuk Y., Rauschmayer F. Beyond "benefits"? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 81:103-111.
51. Postel S.L., Thompson B.H. Watershed protection: capturing the benefits of nature's water supply services. Nat. Resour. Forum 2005, 29:98-108.
52. Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 2003, 302:1912-1914.
53. Reddy V.R., Reddy M.G., Galab S., Soussan J., Springate-Baginski O. Participatory watershed development in India: can it sustain rural livelihoods?. Dev. Change 2004, 35(2):297-326.
54. Robeyns I. The capability approach in practice. J. Polit. Philos. 2006, 14(3):351-376.
55. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson A., Chapin F.S., Lambin E., et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14(2):32.
56. Sen A. 'Equality of what?'. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 1980, 353-360. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. S.M. McMurrin (Ed.).
57. Sen A. The Idea of Justice 2010, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
58. Soussan J., Lincklaen-Arriens W. 'Poverty and Water Security': Understanding How Water Affects the Poor 2004, Asian Development Bank, Manila, (accessed: 15 March 2013).
59. Tacconi L. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 73:29-36.
60. Uchida E., Xu J., Xu Z., Rozelle S. Are the poor benefitting from China's land conservation program?. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2007, 12(4):593-620.
61. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1245-1252.
62. Vignola R., McDaniels T.L., Scholz R.W. Negotiation analysis for mechanisms to deliver ecosystem services: the case of soil conservation in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 75:22-31.
63. Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:48-58.
64. Yashiro M., Duraiappah A., Kosoy N. Chapter 10: A nested institutional approach for managing bundled ecosystem services: experience from managing Satoyama landscapes in Japan. Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services 2013, 191-206. Springer, London. L. Rival, R. Muradian (Eds.).