A Connectionist Model of Complacency and Adaptive Recovery under Automation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 395-410

  Farrell, Simon ^a   Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; HUMAN; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; WORKLOAD;

ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROBLEM SOLVING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 0034154126     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.395     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
2. Broadbent, D. E. (1971). Decision and stress. London: Academic Press.
3. Buchner, A., Funke, J., & Berry, D. C. (1995). Negative correlations between control performance and verbalizable knowledge: Indicators for implicit learning in process control tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 166-187.
4. Byrne, E. A., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Psychophysiology and adaptive automation. Biological Psychology, 42, 249-268.
5. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
6. Davies, D. R., & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The psychology of vigilance. London: Academic Press.
7. Dennis, S., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Shifting attention in cued recall. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 131-138.
8. French, R. M. (1992). Semi-distributed representations and catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Connection Science, 4, 365-377.
9. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247.
10. Hancock, P. A., & Chignell, M. H. (Eds.). (1989). Intelligent interfaces: Theory, research, and design. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11. Hetherington, P. A. (1990). The sequential learning problem in connectionist networks. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
12. Hetherington, P. A., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Is there 'catastrophic interference' in connectionist networks? In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 26-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kessel, C. J., & Wickens, C. D. (1982). The transfer of failure-detection skills between monitoring and controlling dynamics. Human Factors, 24, 49-60.
14. Kortge, C. A. (1990). Episodic memory in connectionist networks. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 764-771). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics, 35, 1243-1270.
16. Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153-184.
17. Lewandowsky, S. (1991). Gradual unlearning and catastrophic interference: A comparison of distributed architectures. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdoch (pp. 445-476). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Lewandowsky, S. (1993). The rewards and hazards of computer simulations. Psychological Science, 4, 236-243.
19. Lewandowsky, S. (1994). On the relation between catastrophic interference and generalization in connectionist networks. Journal of Biological Systems, 2, 307-333.
20. Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M., Griffiths, T. L., & Phang, J. (1999). Categorization using context: Expedient errors and resistance to knowledge restructuring. Manuscript submitted for publication.
21. Lewandowsky, S., & Li, S.-C. (1995). Catastrophic interference in neural networks: Causes, solutions, and data. In F. N. Dempster & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 329-361). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Lewandowsky, S., Mundy, M., & Tan, G. P. A. (in press). The dynamics of trust: Comparing humans to machines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied.
23. McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 109-164). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995). A generation advantage for multiplication skill training and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne, Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 132-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311-322.
26. Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., & Korte, K. J. (1994). Cognitive and social-psychological issues in flight crew/automation interaction. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 191-197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Mouloua, M., Parasuraman, R., & Molloy, R. (1993). Monitoring automation failures: Effects of a single and multi-adaptive function allocation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1-5). Seattle, WA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
28. Murre, J. M. J. (1992). The effects of pattern presentation on interference in back-propagation networks. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 54-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., Mouloua, M., & Hilburn, B. (1996). Monitoring of automated systems. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 91-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
31. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., & Molloy, R. (1994). Monitoring automation failures in human-machine systems. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 45-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M., & Molloy, R. (1996). Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Human Factors, 38, 665-769.
33. Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
34. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
35. Pope, A. T., Bogart, E. H., & Bartolome, E. S. (1995). Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biological Psychology, 40, 187-195.
36. Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285-308.
37. Riley, V. (1996). Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 19-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Rouse, W. B. (1988). Adaptive aiding for human/computer control. Human Factors, 30, 431-438.
39. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propogation. In Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations (pp. 318-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Sarter, N., & Woods, D. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 1-28.
41. Scallen, S. F., Hancock, P. A., & Duley, J. A. (1995). Pilot performance and preference for short cycles of automation in adaptive function allocation. Applied Ergonomics, 26, 397-403.
42. Scerbo, M. W. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 37-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Shiffrin, R. M., & Murnane, K. (1991). Composition, distribution, and interference in memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 331-346). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Singh, I. L., Molloy, R., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Automation-induced "complacency": Development of the complacency-potential rating scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 111-121.
45. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
46. Thackray, R. I., & Touchstone, R. M. (1989). Detection efficiency on an air traffic control monitoring task with and without computer aiding. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 744-748.
47. Wiener, E. L., Curry, R. E., & Faustina, M. L. (1984). Vigilance and task load: In search of the inverted U. Human Factors, 26, 215-222.