Real-time reactions to a 2012 presidential debate

Public Opinion Quarterly

Volumn 78, Issue S1, 2014, Pages 330-343

  Boydstun, Amber E ^a   Glazier, Rebecca A ^b   Pietryka, Matthew T ^c   Resnik, Philip ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84915772638     PISSN: 0033362X     EISSN: 15375331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfu007     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abramowitz, Alan I. 1978. "The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality." American Journal of Political Science 22(3):680-90.
2. Adams, Guy. 2012. "Romney's Wealth in Spotlight Again after Tax Probe; New Evidence of Republican Candidate's Low Payments Follows Poor TV Ratings." Independent, September 3, "World" section, 28.
3. Bartels, Larry. 2006. "Priming and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns." In Capturing Campaign Effects, edited by Henry E. Brady and Richard Johnston, 78-114. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Benoit, William L., Glenn J. Hansen, and Rebecca M. Verser. 2003. "A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates." Communication Monographs 70:335-50.
6. Blais, André, and Andrea M. L. Perrella. 2008. "Systemic Effects of Televised Candidates' Debates." International Journal of Press/Politics 13:451-64.
7. Boydstun, Amber E., Jessica T. Feezell, Rebecca A. Glazier, Timothy P. Jurka, and Matthew T. Pietryka. Forthcoming. "Colleague Crowdsourcing: A Method for Fostering National Student Engagement and Large-N Data Collection." PS: Political Science & Politics.
8. Boydstun, Amber E., Rebecca A. Glazier, and Claire Phillips. 2013. "Agenda Control in the 2008 Presidential Debates." American Politics Research 41:863-99.
9. Boydstun, Amber E., Rebecca A. Glazier, and Matthew T. Pietryka. 2013. "Playing to the Crowd: Agenda Control in Presidential Debates." Political Communication 30:254-77.
10. Brubaker, Jennifer, and Gary Hanson. 2009. "The Effect of Fox News and CN's Postdebate Commentator Analysis on Viewers' Perceptions of Presidential Candidate Performance." Southern Communication Journal 74:339-51.
11. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007. "Framing Theory." Annual Review of Political Science 10:103-26.
12. Converse, Philip. 1964. "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Politics." In Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Ernest Apter, 206-61. New York: Free Press.
13. Erbring, Lutz, Edie N. Goldenberg, and Arthur H. Miller. 1980. "Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the Media." American Journal of Political Science 24:16-49.
14. Fridkin, Kim L., Patrick J. Kenney, Sarah Allen Gershon, Karen Shafer, and Gina Serignese Woodall. 2007. "Capturing the Power of a Campaign Event: The 2004 Presidential Debate in Tempe." Journal of Politics 69:770-85.
15. Geer, John G. 1988. "The Effects of Presidential Debates on the Electorate's Preferences for Candidates." American Politics Research 16:486-501.
16. Haller, H. Brandon, and Helmut Norpoth. 1997. "Reality Bites: News Exposure and Economic Opinion." Public Opinion Quarterly 61(4):555-575.
17. Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. "The Media's Role in Forming Voter's National Economic Evaluations in 1992." American Journal of Political Science 40(2):372-395.
18. Hillygus, D. Sunshine, and Simon Jackman. 2003. "Voter Decision Making in Election 2000: Campaign Effects, Partisan Activation, and the Clinton Legacy." American Journal of Political Science 47:583-96.
19. Holbrook, Allyson L., Matthew K. Berent, Jon A. Krosnick, Penny S. Visser, and David S. Boninger. 2005. "Attitude Importance and the Accumulation of Attitude-Relevant Knowledge in Memory." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:749-69.
20. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1999. "Political Learning from Presidential Debates." Political Behavior 21:67-89.
21. Iyengar, Shanto, Kyu S. Hahn, Jon A. Krosnick, and John Walker. 2008. "Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership." Journal of Politics 70:186-200.
22. Iyengar, Shanto, and Nicholas A. Valentino. 2000. "Who Says What? Source Credibility as a Mediator for Campaign Advertising." In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, edited by Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin, 108-29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Jennings, Will, and Christopher Wlezien. 2011. "Distinguishing between most important problems and issues?" Public Opinion Quarterly 75(3):545-555.
24. Jones, Bryan D., and Frank R. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Karpf, David. 2010. "Online Political Mobilization from the Advocacy Group's Perspective: Looking Beyond Clicktivism." Policy & Internet 2(4):7-41.
26. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
27. Kirk, Rita, and Dan Schill. 2011. "A Digital Agora: Citizen Participation in the 2008 Presidential Debates." American Behavioral Scientist 55:325-47.
28. Kraus, Sidney, and Raymond G. Smith. 1977. "Issues and Images." In The Great Debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960, edited by Sidney Kraus, 289-312. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
29. Lanoue, David J. 1992. "One That Made a Difference: Cognitive Consistency, Political Knowledge, and the 1980 Presidential Debate." Public Opinion Quarterly 56:168-84.
30. Lemert, James B. 1993. "Do Televised Presidential Debates Help Inform Voters?" Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 37:83-94.
31. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1972. "The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media." Public Opinion Quarterly 36:176-87.
32. McKinney, Mitchell S., Lynda Lee Kaid, and Terry A. Robertson. 2001. "The Front-Runner, Contenders, and Also-Rans: Effects of Watching a 2000 Republican Primary Debate." American Behavioral Scientist 44:2232-51.
33. Moore, David W. 2008. "It's Entertainment; Not Polling: Former Gallup Pollster Lampoons CN's 'Audience Reaction Meters' Used in Presidential Debates. iMediaEthics." Available at http://www.imediaethics.org/News/136/Its-entertainment-not-polling-.php.
34. Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe Oxley. 1997. "Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Controvery and Its Effect on Tolerance." American Political Science Review 91:567-84.
35. Niemi, Richard G, John Bremer, and Michael Heel. 1999. "Determinants of state economic perceptions." Political Behavior 21(2):175-193.
36. Pfau, Michael. 2003. "The Changing Nature of Presidential Debate Influence in the New Age of Mass Media Communication." Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference on Presidential Rhetoric, College Station, TX, USA.
37. Prior, Markus. 2012. "Who Watches Presidential Debates? Measurement Problems in Campaign Effects Research." Public Opinion Quarterly 76:350-63.
38. Ramanathan, Suresh, Ann McGill, Joan Phillips, Daniel Schill, and Rita Kirk. 2010. "Are Political Opinions Contagious? An Investigation on the Effects of Seating Position and Prior Attitudes on Moment-to-Moment Evaluations During the Presidential Debates." Advances in Consumer Research 37:242-45.
39. Riker, William H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the American Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
41. Schroeder, Alan. 2008. Presidential Debates: Fifty Years of High-Risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.
42. Shaw, Daron R. 1999. "A Study of Presidential Campaign Event Effects from 1952 to 1992." Journal of Politics 61:387-422.
43. Shulman, Stuart W. 2009. "The Case against Mass E?Mails: Perverse Incentives and Low-Quality Public Participation in U.S. Federal Rulemaking." Policy & Internet 1:23-53.
44. Sigelman, Lee, and Carol K. Sigelman. 1984. "Judgments of the Carter-Reagan Debate: The Eyes of the Beholders." Public Opinion Quarterly 48:624-28.
45. Steeper, Frederick 1978. "Public Responses to Gerald Ford's Statement on Eastern Europe in the Second Debate." In The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral, and Policy Perspectives, edited by George F. Bishop, Robert G. Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck, 81-101. New York: Praeger.
46. Trent, Judith S., and Robert V. Friedenberg. 2008. Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
47. Tsfati, Yariv. 2003. "Debating the Debate." International Journal of Press/Politics 8(3):70-86.
48. Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. White, Micah. 2010. "Clicktivism Is Ruining Leftist Activism." Guardian, August 12. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/aug/12/clicktivism-ruining-leftist-activism.
50. Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. "On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with 'Most Important Problem'." Electoral Studies 24(4):555-579.