Priming and persuasion in presidential campaigns

Capturing Campaign Effects

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 78-112

  Bartels, Larry M ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898368197     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, and Charles H. Franklin. 1994. "Uncertainty and Political Perceptions." Journal of Politics 56:671-88.
2. Bartels, Larry M. 1986. "Issue Voting under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test." American Journal of Political Science 30:709-28.
3. Bartels, Larry M. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Bartels, Larry M. 1992. "The Impact of Electioneering in the United States." In Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change, ed. David Butler and Austin Ranney. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
5. Bartels, Larry M. 1993. "Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure." American Political Science Review 87:267-85.
6. Bartels, Larry M 1997. "Econometrics and Elections." Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 195-96.
7. Bartels, Larry M. 1998. "Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868-1996." Electoral Studies 17: 301-26.
8. Bartels, Larry M. 2002. "Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions." Political Behavior 24:117-50.
9. Beck, Nathaniel. 1994. "We Should Be Modest: Forecasting the 1992 Presidential Election." Political Methodologist 5:19-24.
10. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
12. Campbell, James E. 2001. "The Referendum That Didn't Happen: The Forecasts of the 2000 Presidential Election." PS: Political Science and Politics 34:33-38.
13. Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Stanley Feldman. 1989. "Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference Processes." American Journal of Political Science 33:912-40.
14. Finkel, Steven E. 1993. "Reexamining the 'Minimal Effects' Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns." Journal of Politics 55:1-21.
15. Finkel, Steven E., and Peter R. Schrott. 1995. "Campaign Effects on Voter Choice in the German Election of 1990." British Journal of Political Science 25:821-49.
16. Fiorina, Morris, Samuel Abrams, and Jeremy Pope. 2002. "The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election: Can Retrospective Voting Be Saved?" British Journal of Political Science 33:163-87.
17. Franklin, Charles H. 1991. "Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perceptions of U.S. Senate Incumbents." American Political Science Review 85:1193-213.
18. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1993. "Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable?" British Journal of Political Science 23:409-51.
19. Germond, Jack W., and Jules Witcover. 1985. Wake Us When It's Over: Presidential Politics of 1984. New York: Macmillan.
20. Germond, Jack W., and Jules Witcover. 1989. Whose Broad Stripes and Bright Stars? The Trivial Pursuit of the Presidency 1988. New York: Warner Books.
21. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1994. "Campaigns, National Conditions, and U.S. Presidential Elections." American Journal of Political Science 38:973-98.
22. Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Beverly Hills: Sage.
23. Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Johnston, Richard, André Blais, Henry E. Brady, and Jean Crête. 1992. Letting the People Decide: Dynamics of a Canadian Election. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
25. Just, Marion R., Ann N. Crigler, Dean E. Alger, Timothy E. Cook, Montague Kern, and Darrell M. West. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney. 1999. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Kern, Montague. 1989. 30-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. New York: Praeger.
28. Krosnick, Jon A., and Donald R. Kinder. 1990. "Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming." American Political Science Review 84:497-512.
29. Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
30. Lenz, Gabriel. 2004. "A Reanalysis of Priming Studies Finds Little Evidence of Issue Opinion Priming and Some Evidence of Issue Opinion Change." Manuscript, Department of Politics, Princeton University.
31. Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tom W. Rice. 1992. Forecasting Elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
32. Markus, Gregory B. 1982. "Political Attitudes during an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study." American Political Science Review 76:538-60.
33. Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34. Patterson, Thomas E., and Robert D. McClure. 1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: Putnam.
35. Petrocik, John R. 1996. "Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study." American Journal of Political Science 40:825-50.
36. Romer, Daniel, Kate Kenski, Paul Waldman, Christopher Adasiewicz, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2004. Capturing Campaign Dynamics: The National Annenberg Election Survey. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Rosenstiel, Tom. 1993. Strange Bedfellows: How Television and the Presidential Candidates Changed American Politics, 1992. New York: Hyperion.
38. Rosenstone, Steven J. 1983. Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
39. Sanders, Mitch S. 1996. "Beneath Stormy Waters: The Evolution of Individual Decision Making in the 1984 and 1988 Presidential Elections." PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of Rochester.
40. Shaw, Daron R. 1993. "Strong Persuasion: The Effects of Campaigns in U.S. Presidential Elections." PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
41. Vavreck, Lynn. 1997. "More Than Minimal Effects: Explaining Differences between Clarifying and Insurgent Campaigns in Strategy and Effect." PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of Rochester.
42. Zaller, John. 2002. "The Statistical Power of Election Studies to Detect Media Exposure Effects in Political Campaigns." Electoral Studies 21:297-329.