A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates

Communication Monographs

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 335-350

  Benoit, William L ^a   Hansen, Glenn J ^a   Verser, Rebecca M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342267605     PISSN: 03637751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0363775032000179133     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abramowitz, A. I. (1978). The impact of a presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 680-690.
2. Allen, M., & Burrell, N. (2002). The negativity effect in political advertising: A meta-analysis. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. Atkin, C., Hocking, J., & McDermott, S. (1979). Home state voter response and secondary media coverage. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 429-436). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
4. Beatty, M. J. (2002). Do we know a vector from a scalar? Why measures of association (not their squares) are appropriate indices of effect. Human Communication Research, 28, 605-611.
5. Becker, L. B., Sobowale, I. A., Cobbey, R. E., & Eyal, C. H. (1978). Debates' effects on voters' understanding of candidates and issues. In G. F. Bishop, R. G. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 126-139). New York: Praeger.
6. Benoit, W. L. (1999), Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements from 1952-1996. New York: Praeger.
7. Benoit, W. L., Blaney, J. R., & Pier, P. M. (1998a). Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. New York: Praeger.
8. Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (in press). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research.
9. Benoit, W. L. McKinney, M. S., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). Beyond learning and persona: Extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs, 68, 259-273.
10. Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002a). Effects of watching campaign 2000 presidential primary debates. Journal of Communication, 52, 316-331.
11. Benoit, W. L., Pier, P. M., Brazeal, L. M., McHale, J. P., Klyukovksi, A., & Airne, D. (2002b). The primary decision; A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries, Westport, CT: Praeger.
12. Benoit, W. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (in press). Effects of watching a presidential primary debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate.
13. Benoit, W. L., Webber, D. J., & Berman J. (1998b). Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 163-172.
14. Benoit, W. L., & Wells, W. T. (1996). Candidates in conflict; Persuasise attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
15. Ben-Zeev, S., & White, L. (1962). Effects and implications. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 331-337). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
16. Best, S.J., & Hubbard, C. (1999). Maximizing "minimal effects": The impact of early primary season debates on voter preferences. American Politics Quarterly, 27, 450-487.
17. Best, S. J., & Hubbard, C. (2000). The role of televised debates in the presidential nominating process. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House 2000; How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 255-284). New York: Chatham House.
18. Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R., & Tuchfarber, A. (1978). Debate watching and the acquisition of political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 28, 99-113.
19. Boster, F. J. (2002). On making progress in communication science. Human Communication Research, 28, 473-490.
20. Brians, C. L., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 172-193.
21. Carlin, D. P. (1994). A rationale for a focus group study. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 3-19). Westport, CT: Praeger.
22. Carter, R. (1962). Some effects of the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates; Background, perspective, effects (pp. 253-270). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
23. Chaffee, S. H. (1978). Presidential debates - Are the helpful to voters? Communication Monographs, 45, 330-346.
24. Coleman, S. (2000). Televised election debates: International perspectives. New York: St. Martin's.
25. D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2000). Media bias in presidential elections: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 50, 133-156.
26. D'Alessio, D., & Allen, M. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psychological Reports, 91, 527-532.
27. Desutschmann, P. (1962). Viewing, conversation, and voting intentions. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 232-252). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
28. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Friedenberg, R. V. (1994). Patterns and trends in national political debates: 1960-1992. In R. F. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates, 1960-1992 (2nd ed., pp. 235-259). Westport, CT: Praeger.
30. Gallup, G. (1987). The impact of presidential debates on the vote and turnout. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.), Presidential debates; 1988 and beyond (pp. 34-42). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
31. Gallup Poll. (1999, April 9). Independents rank as largest U.S. political group. Retrieved June 20, 2001, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr990409c.asp
32. Geer, J. G. (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate's preference for candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 486-501.
33. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Graber, D. A. (1978). Problems in measuring audience effects of the 1976 debates. In G. F. Bishop, R. G. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates; Media, electoral, and policy perspective (pp. 105-125). New York: Praeger.
35. Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Wen, W.-C. (2002a). The role of political ad recall, news use, political discussion, and debate viewing in campaign issue knowledge and salience. Communication Monographs, 69, 296-310.
36. Holbert, R. L, Benoit, W. L., & McKinney, M. S. (2002b). The role of debate viewing in establishing "enlightened preference" in the 2000 presidential election. Seoul, Korea: ICA.
37. Holbrook, T. M. (1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21, 67-89.
38. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Jacoby, J., Troutman, T. R., & Whittler, T. E. (1986). Viewer miscomprehension of the 1980 presidential debate: A research note. Political Psychology, 7, 297-308.
40. Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates; International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York: St. Martin's Press.
41. Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2000). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, CT: Praeger.
43. Kraus, S., & Smith, R. G. (1962). Issues and images. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 289-313). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
44. Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1962). Reaction of viewers. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 313-330). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
45. Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1978). Immediate and delayed responses to a Carter-Ford debate: Assessing public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 322-341.
46. Lanoue, D. J. (1991). The turning point. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 80-95.
47. Lau, R. R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C., & Babbitt, P. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review, 93, 851-875.
48. Louden, A. (2003). Political debates: Selected bibliography. Retrieved May 12, 2003, from http://www.wfu.edu/%7Elouden/Political%20Communication/Bibs/DEBATES.html
49. McKinney, M. S., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2001). The front-runner, contenders, and also-rans: Effects of watching a 2000 Republican primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2232-2251.
50. McLeod, J. M., Durall, J. A., Ziemke, D. A., & Bybee, C. R. (1979). Reactions of young and older voters: Expanding the context of effects. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 348-367). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
51. Mulder, R. D. (1978). The political effects of the Carter-Ford debate: An experimental analysis. Sociological Focus, 11, 33-45.
52. Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1999). The changing American voter (enlarged ed.). San Jose, CA: toExcel/Harvard University Press.
53. Payne, J. G., Golden, J. L., Marlier, J., & Ratzan, S. C. (1989). Perceptions of the 1988 presidential and vice-presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 425-435.
54. Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debates and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16, 99-112.
55. Racine Group. (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 199-218.
56. Rose, D. D. (1976). Citizen uses of the Ford-Carter debates. Journal of Politics, 41, 214-221.
57. Stock, W., Okum, M., Haring, M., Miller, W., Kinney, C., & Williams, R. M. (1982). Rigor in data synthesis: A case study of reliability in meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 11(6), 10-20.
58. Swanson, L. L., & Swanson, D. L. (1978). The agenda-setting functions of the first Ford-Carter debate. Communication Monographs, 45, 347-353.
59. Wall, V., Golden, J. L., & James, H. (1988). Perceptions of the 1984 presidential debates and a select 1988 presidential primary debate. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 18, 541-563.
60. Wolf, F. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
61. Yawn, M., & Beatty, B. (2000). Debate-induced opinion change: What matters? American Politics Quarterly, 28, 270-285.
62. Zhu, J.-H., Milavasky, J. R., & Biswas, R. (1994). Do televised debates affect image perceptions more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate. Human Communication Research, 20, 302-333.