Relational diversity promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Xu, Bo ^a   Wang, Jianwei ^a   Deng, Ruipu ^b   Li, Miao ^c  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b China Three Gorges Corporation   (China)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; FRIEND; GAME; HUMAN; INTIMACY; PRISONER DILEMMA GAME; RELATIONAL DIVERSITY; SIMULATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN RELATION; PRISONER DILEMMA; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SOCIAL MEDIA;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PRISONER DILEMMA; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84915756240     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114464     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Wasserman S (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications: Cambridge university press.
2. Perc M (2009) Evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks subject to error and attack. New Journal of Physics 11:033027.
3. Ren J, Wang W-X, Qi F (2007) Randomness enhances cooperation: a resonance-type phenomenon in evolutionary games. Physical Review E 75:045101.
4. Szabó G, Fath G (2007) Evolutionary games on graphs. Physics Reports 446:97-216.
5. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology: 1360-1380.
6. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390-1396.
7. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak MA (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441:502-505.
8. Hilbe C, Nowak MA, Sigmund K (2013) Evolution of extortion in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:6913-6918.
9. Szolnoki A, Perc M (2014) Evolution of extortion in structured populations. Physical Review E 89:022804.
10. Szolnoki A, Perc M (2014) Defection and extortion as unexpected catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations. Sci Rep 4.
11. Nowak MA, Bonhoeffer S, May RM (1994) Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91:4877-4881.
12. Nowak MA, May RM (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359:826-829.
13. Santos FC, Pacheco JM (2005) Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Physical Review Letters 95:098104.
14. Santos FC, Pacheco JM, Lenaerts T (2006) Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:3490-3494.
15. Santos FC, Santos MD, Pacheco JM (2008) Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454:213-216.
16. Cao X-B, Du W-B, Rong Z-H (2010) The evolutionary public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 389:1273-1280.
17. Du WB, Cao XB, Hu MB, Wang WX (2009) Asymmetric cost in snowdrift game on scale-free networks. Epl 87.
18. Du WB, Cao XB, Zhao L, Hu MB (2009) Evolutionary games on scale-free networks with a preferential selection mechanism. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 388:4509-4514.
19. Harrison F, Sciberras J, James R (2011) Strength of Social Tie Predicts Cooperative Investment in a Human Social Network. PLoS ONE 6:e18338.
20. Xu B, Liu L, You WJ (2011) Importance of tie strengths in the prisoner's dilemma game on social networks. Physics Letters A 375:2269-2273.
21. Feld SL (1997) Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations. Social networks 19:91-95.
22. Onnela J-P, Saramäki J, Hyvönen J, Szabó G, Lazer D, et al. (2007) Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:7332-7336.
23. Zhao J, Wu J, Xu K (2010) Weak ties: Subtle role of information diffusion in online social networks. Physical Review E 82:016105.
24. Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. science 286:509-512.
25. Erdos P, Renyi A (1961) On the strength of connectedness of a random graph. Acta Mathematica Hungarica 12:261-267.
26. Lei CA, Wu T, Jia JY, Cong R, Wang L (2010) Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 389:4708-4714.
27. Chen XJ, Perc M (2014) Optimal distribution of incentives for public cooperation in heterogeneous interaction environments. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 8.
28. Wang X, Chen X, Wang L (2014) Random allocation of pies promotes the evolution of fairness in the Ultimatum Game. Sci Rep 4.
29. Cao XB, Hong C, Du WB, Zhang J (2013) Improving the network robustness against cascading failures by adding links. Chaos Solitons & Fractals 57:35-40.
30. Du WB, Wu ZX, Cai KQ (2013) Effective usage of shortest paths promotes transportation efficiency on scale-free networks. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 392:3505-3512.
31. Liu C, Du WB, Wang WX (2014) Particle Swarm Optimization with Scale-Free Interactions. Plos One 9.
32. Li C, Zhang B, Cressman R, Tao Y (2013) Evolution of Cooperation in a Heterogeneous Graph: Fixation Probabilities under Weak Selection. PloS one 8:e66560.
33. Xu B, Huang Y, Kwak H, Contractor N (2013) Structures of broken ties: exploring unfollow behavior on twitter. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM. pp. 871-876.
34. Golder SA, Yardi S. Structural Predictors of Tie Formation in Twitter: Transitivity and Mutuality; 2010 20-22 Aug. 2010. pp. 88-95.
35. Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management science 50:1477-1490.
36. Marsden PV, Campbell KE (1984) Measuring tie strength. Social forces 63:482-501.
37. White DR, Houseman M (2002) The navigability of strong ties: Small worlds, tie strength, and network topology. Complexity 8:72-81.
38. Wirtz J, Chew P (2002) The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on wordofmouth behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management 13:141-162.
39. Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, et al. (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review: 73-78.
40. Thaler RH (2000) From homo economicus to homo sapiens. The Journal of Economic Perspectives: 133-141.
41. Perc M, Szolnoki A (2008) Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. Physical Review E 77.
42. Shi DM, Zhuang Y, Wang BH (2010) Group diversity promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game. Epl 90.
43. Xia CY, Ma ZQ, Wang YL, Wang JS, Chen ZQ (2011) Enhancement of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma game on weighted lattices. Physica a-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 390:4602-4609.